Skip to main content

Table 5 Relative effects of different interventions on the WST

From: Comparison of efficacy of non-pharmacological intervention for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

 

A

B

C

D

E

F

A

0

     

B

−1.03 (−4.52, 2.48)

0

    

C

−0.33 (−1.78, 1.16)

0.70 (−2.92, 4.29)

0

   

D

−1.12 (−2.79, 0.60)

−0.08 (−3.55, 3.39)

−0.78 (−2.42, 0.85)

0

  

E

0.31 (−1.81, 2.47)

1.35 (−1.40, 4.12)

0.64 (−1.71, 3.05)

1.43 (−0.67, 3.57)

0

 

F

0.55 (−0.95, 2.09)

1.57 (−2.05, 5.20)

0.88 (0.30, 1.46)

1.67 (−0.02, 3.32)

0.24 (−-2.19, 2.63)

0

G

0.59 (−1.09, 2.26)

1.62 (−2.10, 5.34)

0.91 (−0.29, 2.10)

1.70 (−0.21, 3.62)

0.27 (−2.27, 2.80)

0.03 (−1.19, 1.28)

H

0.48 (−1.41, 2.37)

1.50 (−2.31, 5.30)

0.81 (−0.58, 2.17)

1.58 (−0.48, 3.66)

0.16 (−2.51, 2.81)

−0.07 (−1.46, 1.31)

I

1.00 (−1.82, 3.74)

2.05 (−2.46, 6.44)

1.32 (−1.82, 4.48)

2.10 (−1.14, 5.34)

0.67 (−2.89, 4.16)

0.44 (−2.73, 3.60)

K

0.33 (−2.82, 3.45)

1.36 (−3.28, 5.90)

0.65 (−2.09, 3.41)

1.43 (−1.77, 4.69)

0.01 (−3.65, 3.68)

−0.23 (−3.03, 2.62)

L

3.02 (0.88, 5.28)

4.05 (0.11, 8.01)

3.35 (1.75, 5.02)

4.13 (1.87, 6.47)

2.71 (−0.12, 5.60)

2.47 (0.76, 4.25)

G

H

I

K

L

0

    

−0.11 (−1.37, 1.13)

0

   

0.40 (−2.85, 3.67)

0.52 (−2.88, 3.90)

0

  

−0.25 (−3.25, 2.72)

−0.13 (−3.23, 2.95)

−0.65 (−4.81, 3.51)

0

 

2.44 (0.43, 4.51)

2.54 (0.45, 4.75)

2.03 (−1.49, 5.63)

2.69 (−0.52, 5.98)

0

  1. Bold emphasis means that the results are statistically significant