Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of percent-correct scores in SAM white noise for conditions without temporal envelope cues from two adjacent frequency regions for the two groups

From: Differential weighting of temporal envelope cues from the low-frequency region for Mandarin sentence recognition in noise

Conditions

Group 5

Group 6

t-test (p value)

Hole 1 + 2

22.3 ± 3.1 (%)

23.8 ± 5.3 (%)

0.436

Hole 2 + 3

18.3 ± 4.6 (%)

18.4 ± 5.8 (%)

0.967

Hole 3 + 4

68.2 ± 7.6 (%)

69.5 ± 6.8 (%)

0.692

Hole 4 + 5

84.1 ± 4.3 (%)

84.7 ± 4.2 (%)

0.735