Skip to main content

Table 3 Linear mixed effects model post-hoc analysis for ERP peaks

From: Face-induced gamma oscillations and event-related potentials in patients with epilepsy: an intracranial EEG study

 

Group O

Group M

β

95% CI

p-value

95% CI

95% CI

p-value

AM

      

 1

      

  N110 faces vs mosaics

0

[− 6.52, 6.53]

ns

− 0.13

[− 7.32, 7.06]

ns

  N240 faces vs mosaics

10.04

[3.51, 16.56]

 < 0.001

14.28

[7.09, 21.46]

 < 0.001

  N360 faces vs mosaics

8.49

[1.97, 15.02]

0.003

5.86

[− 1.33, 13.05]

ns

 2

      

  N110 dark- skinned vs masks

3.02

[− 6.51, 12.55]

ns

11.14

[0.67, 21.61]

0.024

  N110 veiled vs masks

− 0.90

[− 10.24, 8.44]

ns

13.99

[3.16, 24.81]

0.001

  N360 famous vs masks

9.66

[0.25, 19.08]

0.038

8.33

[− 1.98, 18.63]

ns

  N360 famous vs veiled

15.15

[5.43, 24.88]

 < 0.001

9.39

[− 1.13, 19.92]

ns

  N360 famous vs Caucasian

4.33

[− 4.61, 13.26]

ns

14.25

[3.04, 25.46]

 < 0.001

  N360 dark- skinned vs Caucasian

− 2.18

[− 11.24, 6.88]

ns

15.48

[4.13, 26.83]

 < 0.001

HI

      

 1

      

  N110 faces vs mosaics

− 3.87

[− 12.04, 4.30]

ns

− 0.87

[− 9.48, 7.74]

ns

  N240 faces vs mosaics

2.64

[− 5.53, 10.81]

ns

− 0.92

[− 9.53, 7.69]

ns

  N360 faces vs mosaics

3.68

[− 4.49, 11.85]

ns

1.82

[− 6.79, 10.43]

ns

 2

      

  N360 dark- skinned vs masks

2.11

[− 10.80, 15.03]

ns

15.85

[3.17, 28.52]

0.002

FU

      

 1

      

  N110 faces vs mosaics

1.65

[− 5.55, 8.85]

ns

2.69

[− 1.92, 7.29]

ns

  N240 faces vs mosaics

22.25

[15.05, 29.45]

 < 0.001

8.93

[4.32, 13.53]

 < 0.001

  N360 faces vs mosaics

19.41

[12.21, 26.61]

 < 0.001

7.13

[2.53, 11.74]

 < 0.001

 2

      

  N240 famous vs masks

27.47

[16.89, 38.05]

 < 0.001

11.57

[4.70, 18.45]

 < 0.001

  N240 dark- skinned vs masks

18.69

[7.88, 29.50]

 < 0.001

8.94

[2.03, 15.85]

0.001

  N240 veiled vs masks

14.94

[4.35, 25.53]

 < 0.001

7.25

[0.18, 14.31]

0.038

  N240 Caucasian vs masks

25.64

[15.78, 35.51]

 < 0.001

10.47

[3.01, 17.94]

 < 0.001

  N360 famous vs masks

16.64

[6.06, 27.22]

 < 0.001

10.73

[− 1.63, 23.10]

ns

  N360 dark- skinned vs masks

13.98

[3.17, 24.79]

0.001

12.19

[− 1.34, 25.72]

ns

  N360 veiled vs masks

17.42

[6.83, 28.02]

 < 0.001

7.81

[− 4.84, 20.46]

ns

  N360 Caucasian vs masks

19.34

[9.47, 29.20]

 < 0.001

4.35

[− 2.55, 11.25]

ns

PH

      

 1

      

  N110 faces vs mosaics

− 3.38

[− 9.13, 2.37]

ns

6.34

[0.92, 11.77]

0.011

  N240 faces vs mosaics

3.4

[− 2.35, 9.15]

ns

2.68

[− 2.75, 8.10]

ns

  N360 faces vs mosaics

6.57

[0.82, 12.32]

0.014

12.47

[7.04, 17.90]

 < .0001

 2

      

  N240 famous vs dark- skinned

8.98

[0.84, 17.12]

 < 0.001

0.45

[− 7.66, 8.55]

ns

  N240 famous vs masks

15.74

[7.56, 23.91]

 < 0.001

7.62

[− 0.46, 15.71]

ns

  N360 famous vs dark- skinned

8.17

[0.03, 16.31]

0.048

2.87

[− 5.24, 10.97]

ns

  N360 famous vs masks

15.59

[7.42, 23.76]

 < 0.001

13.31

[5.23, 21.40]

 < 0.001

  N360 famous vs veiled

9.55

[1.20, 17.89]

0.009

9.51

[1.26, 17.76]

 < 0.001

  N360 famous vs Caucasian

10.12

[2.29, 17.95]

0.001

9.70

[1.16, 18.24]

 < 0.001

  1. AM Amygdala, FU Fusiform gyrus, HI Hippocampus, PH Parahippocampal gyrus, ns Not significant (p ≥ 0.05)
  2. In Model 2, post-hoc analyses with non-significant p-values in both Group O and Group M were omitted from the table for viewing purposes
Back to article page

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us