Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis 1 (L1 and L2 combined): model comparison

From: Capturing multiple interaction effects in L1 and L2 object-naming reaction times in healthy bilinguals: a mixed-effects multiple regression analysis

Models

Information criteria (log likelihood)

Deviance (− 2* log likelihood)

Number of parameters

Chi-square obtained

df

p value

Fixed EffectI only

25,324.67

− 50,625.74

2

   

Plus subjI

25,544.43

− 51,088.86

3

439.51

1

p < 0.0001

Plus subjI. ItemI

25,707.13

− 51,414.26

4

325.41

1

p < 2.2e−16

Plus runNum

25,386.19

− 51,672.38

5

258.11

1

p < 2.2e−16

Plus trialNum

25,879.00

− 51,758.00

6

85.62

1

p < 2.2e−16

Plus firstPhonemeDiff

25,903.81

− 51,807.62

7

49.62

1

p = 1.865e−12

Plus langStatus

25,917.20

− 51,834.40

8

26.78

1

p = 1.827e−06

Plus log10WF

25,928.58

− 51,857.16

9

22.77

1

p = 0.0001816

Plus runNum*log10WF

25,935.73

− 51,871.46

10

14.29

1

p = 0.0001564

Plus langStatus*log10WF

25,942.74

− 51,885.48

11

14.01

1

p = 0.0001816

Plus runNum*trialNum

25,947.10

− 51,894.20

12

8.73

1

p = 0.003138

  1. This table provides a comparison of different statistical models used for the reaction time (RT) comparisons between the first language (L1) and second language (L2)