Skip to main content

Table 1 Difference between verum and sham stimulation in amplitude, latency and a combined z-Score

From: Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials

  Change in amplitude (nV) Change in latency (ms) Change in Z-score
Verum Sham p-value Verum Sham p-value Verum Sham p-value
Full field − 2.54 + 4.63 0.155  + 0.01  + 0.60 0.538 − 0.079  + 0.063 0.528
Central − 2.92  + 8.47 0.094  + 1.49 − 1.84 0.010 − 0.282  + 0.496 0.006
Peripheral 1 − 2.49  + 7.01 0.158  + 0.50 − 0.47 0.298 − 0.140  + 0.275 0.121
Peripheral 2 − 3.63  + 4.24 0.181 − 0.24  + 1.40 0.410 − 0.079 − 0.053 0.941
Peripheral 3 − 2.00  + 3.20 0.208  + 0.15  + 2.83 0.148 − 0.081 − 0.269 0.527
Peripheral 4 − 1.80  + 1.51 0.379 − 1.33  + 0.26 0.443  + 0.118  + 0.013 0.744