Skip to main content

Table 3 Candidate housekeeping gene comparisons

From: Evaluation of reference genes for gene expression studies in mouse and N2a cell ischemic stroke models using quantitative real-time PCR

Sample

Mean ΔCp

SD

Mean SD

Mean ΔCp

SD

Mean SD

  

Tissues

  

Cells

 

18S versus HPRT

9.190

0.555

0.568

9.515

1.056

0.877

18S versus β-actin

6.340

0.518

 

4.329

0.767

 

18S versus Sdha

10.180

0.519

 

11.342

1.143

 

18S versus GAPDH

19.700

0.665

 

19.096

0.723

 

18S versus cyclophilin

6.060

0.584

 

4.657

0.699

 

HPRT versus β-actin

2.853

0.613

0.572

5.185

0.543

0.840

HPRT versus Sdha

0.990

0.623

 

1.827

0.839

 

HPRT versus GAPDH

10.510

0.681

 

9.581

0.960

 

HPRT versus 18S

9.192

0.555

 

9.515

1.056

 

HPRT versus cyclophilin

3.130

0.389

 

4.858

0.802

 

Sdha versus HPRT

0.990

0.623

0.607

1.827

0.839

0.921

Sdha versus β-actin

3.843

0.642

 

7.013

0.688

 

Sdha versus GAPDH

9.521

0.569

 

7.754

1.010

 

Sdha versus 18S

10.182

0.519

 

11.342

1.143

 

Sdha versus cyclophilin

4.120

0.681

 

6.685

0.926

 

β-actin versus HPRT

2.853

0.613

0.623

5.185

0.543

0.671

β-actin versus Sdha

3.843

0.642

 

7.013

0.688

 

β-actin versus GAPDH

13.363

0.634

 

14.767

0.736

 

β-actin versus 18S

6.339

0.518

 

4.329

0.767

 

β-actin versus cyclophilin

0.277

0.711

 

0.327

0.618

 

Cyclophilin versus HPRT

3.130

0.389

0.626

4.858

0.802

0.734

Cyclophilin versus β-actin

0.277

0.711

 

0.327

0.618

 

Cyclophilin versus Sdha

4.120

0.681

 

6.685

0.926

 

Cyclophilin versus GAPDH

13.640

0.763

 

14.439

0.624

 

Cyclophilin versus 18S

6.062

0.584

 

4.657

0.699

 

GAPDH versus HPRT

10.510

0.681

0.662

9.581

0.960

0.811

GAPDH versus β-actin

13.363

0.634

 

14.767

0.736

 

GAPDH versus Sdha

9.521

0.569

 

7.754

1.010

 

GAPDH versus 18S

19.702

0.665

 

19.096

0.723

 

GAPDH versus cyclophilin

13.640

0.763

 

14.439

0.624