Table 2 Data of visually evoked event-related potentials (oddball paradigm) recording presented separately for both subjects group
From: Musical ability is associated with enhanced auditory and visual cognitive processing
Musicians (n = 10) | Non-musicians (n = 10) | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
Frequent stimulus | |||
P1 latency (ms) | 122 ± 11 | 81 ± 0 | ns (p = 0.500) |
N1 latency (ms) | 165 ± 23 | 169 ± 24 | ns (p = 0.604) |
P2 latency (ms) | 252 ± 14 | 251 ± 16 | ns (p = 0.837) |
N2 latency (ms) | 305 ± 19 | 301 ± 18 | ns (p = 0.755) |
P3 latency (ms) | 394 ± 23 | 383 ± 52 | ns (p = 0.902) |
Infrequent stimulus | |||
P1 latency (ms) | 94 ± 27 | 116 ± 0 | ns (p = 0.667) |
N1 latency (ms) | 156 ± 23 | 168 ± 20 | ns (p = 0.243) |
P2 latency (ms) | 228 ± 9 | 239 ± 15 | ns (p = 0.105) |
N2 latency (ms) | 272 ± 16 | 277 ± 15 | ns (p = 0.631) |
P3 latency (ms) | 390 ± 33 | 411 ± 22 | p = 0.043 |
P3 amplitude (µV) | 14 ± 6 | 12 ± 4 | ns (p = 0.253) |
P3 habituation (ms) | 0.6 ± 7.8 | 7.3 ± 11.0 | p = 0.018 |
Mean choice reaction time (ms) | 381 ± 45 | 405 ± 58 | ns (p = 0.436) |