Skip to main content


  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access
  • Probabilistic models and inference algorithms for neuronal decoding of UP and DOWN states

    • 1, 2Email author,
    • 2, 3,
    • 1,
    • 2 and
    • 1, 2, 4
    BMC Neuroscience20089 (Suppl 1) :P32

    • Published:


    • Hide Markov Model
    • Spike Train
    • Hide State
    • Inference Algorithm
    • Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo


    In the neuroscience literature, periods during which populations of neurons are either simultaneously depolarized or hyperpolarized are often classified as "UP" and "DOWN" states, respectively [1]. No particular attention has been devoted to accurately characterize the transition between these two states within a statistical framework [2]. We propose two (semi-) Markov probabilistic models, in both discrete- and continuous-time domains, aiming to infer a discrete two-state (UP vs. DOWN) latent process based on multi-unit spike train observations. The simultaneously recorded spike trains, treated as stochastic point processes, are modulated by the discrete hidden state and the firing history of ensemble neurons. To jointly estimate the hidden state and the unknown parameters of the probabilistic models, we develop statistical inference algorithms within the maximum likelihood estimation framework.


    Simultaneous recordings of electroencephalograph (EEG) and multi-unit spike trains are collected from the primary somatosensory cortex and hippocampus of behaving rats during (RUN) behavior and sleep. For the purpose of the UP/DOWN state analysis, only data from slow wave sleep (SWS) sessions are analyzed.


    The UP/DOWN states are treated as a latent two-state Markov or semi-Markov process. The multi-unit spike trains are modeled as state-dependent Markov-modulated Cox processes. Given the observed spike trains, the missing data estimation problem can be tackled efficiently by maximum likelihood estimation. We develop a discrete-time two-state hidden Markov model (HMM) and the associated expectation maximization (EM) algorithm [3] for estimating the UP and DOWN states. Using estimates obtained from this analysis, we further develop a continuous-time semi-Markov model for inferring the sojourn time probability distributions that characterize the transition between the two states. This inference is tackled by a Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm, including implementation of a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) sampling procedure [4].


    The discrete-time HMM provides a fast and reasonable estimate of the hidden states; however, it is prone to converge to a local solution that is far away from the optimum estimate. The continuous-time semi-Markov model uses the RJMCMC to incrementally estimate where and how many state transitions occur during the inference procedure, which yields more reliable estimation results (as confirmed by analysis of synthetic data). Using different methods, we compared the EEG-triggered average based on the estimated UP-state start and end time. Results suggested that the EEG-triggered (K-complex) average from the continuous-time model produced a more accurate onset of the UP state.



    The research was supported by NIH/NHLBI grant R01-HL084502 for Z. Chen and R. Barbieri, NIH/NIDA grant R01-DA015644 to E. N. Brown and M. A. Wilson. S. Vijayan was supported by NIH/NRSA grant T32 HL07901.

    Authors’ Affiliations

    Neuroscience Statistics Research Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
    Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA


    1. Sirota A, Csicsvari J, Buhl D, Buzsaki G: Communication between neocortex and hippocampus during sleep in rodents. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 2065-2069. 10.1073/pnas.0437938100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    2. Ji D, Wilson MA: Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nature Neurosci. 2007, 10 (1): 100-107. 10.1038/nn1825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
    3. Smith AC, Brown EN: Estimating a state-space model from point process observations. Neural Computat. 2003, 15: 965-991. 10.1162/089976603765202622.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
    4. Ball F, Cai Y, Kadane JB, O'Hagan A: Bayesian inference for ion-channel gating mechanisms directly from single-channel recordings, using Markov chain Monte Carlo. Proc. Royal. Soc. Lond. A. 1999, 455: 2879-2932.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


    © Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

    This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.