Skip to main content

Table 1 Statistical comparison between the clk-mov curves of the hand and foot.

From: Synchrony of hand-foot coupled movements: is it attained by mutual feedback entrainment or by independent linkage of each limb to a common rhythm generator?

 

segment

coupled with

coupling main effect

frequency main effect

interaction

isodirectional association

hand unloaded

alone

   
  

foot unloaded

F(2,18) = 0.32

F(8,72) = 1.25

F(16,144) = 1.20

  

foot loaded

p = 0.732

p = 0.284

p = 0.274

 

foot unloaded

alone

   
  

hand unloaded

F(2,18) = 1.80

F(8,72) = 1.98

F(16,144) = 1.19

  

hand loaded

p = 0.194

p = 0.060

p = 0.278

 

hand loaded

alone

F(1,9) = 1.61

F(8,72) = 3.02

F(8,72) = 1.02

  

foot unloaded

p = 0.236

p < 0.0055*

p = 0.426

 

foot loaded

alone

F(1,9) = 2.66

F(8,72) = 7.13

F(8,72) = 0.49

  

hand unloaded

p = 0.137

p < 0.000001*

p = 0.856

antidirectional association

hand unloaded

alone

   
  

foot unloaded

F(2,18) = 0.16

F(5,45) = 1.94

F(10,90) = 0.68

  

foot loaded

p = 0.854

p = 0.105

p = 0.739

 

foot unloaded

alone

   
  

hand unloaded

F(2,18) = 2.17

F(5,45) = 1.04

F(10,90) = 0.96

  

hand loaded

p = 0.143

p = 0.406

p = 0.481

 

hand loaded

alone

F(1,9) = 1.71

F(5,45) = 11.03

F(5,45) = 1.06

  

foot unloaded

p = 0.224

p = 0.000001*

p = 0.394

 

foot loaded

alone

F(1,9) = 1.93

F(5,45) = 8.06

F(5,45) = 1.33

  

hand unloaded

p = 0.198

p = 0.00002*

p = 0.270

  1. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA, 2 or 3 coupling modalities × 9 frequencies. Direction of movement association is indicated in col.1, moving segment in col.2 and coupling modality in col.3. Significant effects marked by asterisk. In all the configurations examined, the ANOVA test failed to reveal any significant effect of coupling on the clk-mov curves. The p values were very high in two configurations and much lower (0.137 <p < 0.236) in the others. It is worth noting, however, that in all the latter cases, the effect of coupling, even if not significant, was opposite to that expected, i.e. the lagging segment was phase-delayed or the leading segment was phase-advanced.