Skip to main content

Table 2 The results of four repeated measures ANOVAs comparing either the accuracy or the duration of performance on either the last vs. the first mCST trial or after vs. before the session break on all experimental days.

From: Practice effects on the modified Concept Shifting Task (mCST): A convenient assessment for treatment effects on prefrontal cognitive function

Effects df; df error F p two-tailed η 2 part power
last vs. first mCST TRIAL      
ACCURACY      
TRIAL 1; 49 1.97 .167 .04 .28
STUDY 4; 49 .71 .587 .06 .21
TRIAL×STUDY 4; 49 .42 .791 .03 .14
DURATION      
TRIAL 1; 49 12.45 .001* .20 .93
STUDY 4; 49 1.91 .124 .14 .54
TRIAL×STUDY 4; 49 .65 .628 .05 .20
after vs. before BREAK (all days)      
ACCURACY      
BREAK 1; 49 .31 .581 .01 .09
STUDY 4; 49 1.14 .350 .09 .33
BREAK×STUDY 4; 49 .38 .826 .03 .13
DURATION      
BREAK 1; 49 6.82 .012* .12 .73
STUDY 4; 49 1.35 .266 .10 .39
BREAK×STUDY 4; 49 .63 .646 .05 .19
  1. Note. df- degrees of freedom, η2 part - partial eta squared (measure of effect size).
  2. *p < .05
Back to article page

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us