Table 1 The methodological details of the five studies reported in the current article.
Study no.Country Year | N Males % male | Participants Age M ± SD | Task administration mode | Randomisation of trials | Task instruction | Data scoring method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 Australia 2005 | 8 6M 75% | Students/ Staff 39 ± 15 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal | Real time- stop watch/video-recording |
2 Germany 2009 | 15 9M 60% | Students 21 ± 1 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal/written | Real time- stop watch |
3 Germany 2009 | 9 3M 33% | Students 21 ± 3 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal/written | Real time- stop watch |
4 Germany 2010 | 16 5M 31% | Students 20 ± 1 | Electronic | Fully-random | written | Computerised |
5 Germany 2010 | 6 1M 17% | Students 20 ± 1 | Electronic | Fully-random | written | Computerised |