Table 1 The methodological details of the five studies reported in the current article.
|
Study no.Country Year |
N
Males % male |
Participants Age M ± SD | Task administration mode | Randomisation of trials | Task instruction | Data scoring method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 Australia 2005 |
8 6M 75% |
Students/ Staff 39 ± 15 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal | Real time- stop watch/video-recording |
|
2 Germany 2009 |
15 9M 60% |
Students 21 ± 1 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal/written | Real time- stop watch |
|
3 Germany 2009 |
9 3M 33% |
Students 21 ± 3 | Paper | Pseudo-random | verbal/written | Real time- stop watch |
|
4 Germany 2010 |
16 5M 31% |
Students 20 ± 1 | Electronic | Fully-random | written | Computerised |
|
5 Germany 2010 |
6 1M 17% |
Students 20 ± 1 | Electronic | Fully-random | written | Computerised |