Volume 9 Supplement 1
Learning Bayesian network structure based on the classification and regression tree
© Sun and Tang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Published: 11 July 2008
Most methods in neuroimaging studies are based on Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) that uses a mass univariate approach to find regional morphological changes and to obviate the need for specification of ROIs. Bayesian network methods can capture multivariate and nonlinear probabilistic dependency relationships between the variables in biological experiments [1, 2]. We applied such procedures to describe the dependency relationship among the behavioral, clinical and brain structural variables in a project for diagnosing the early stages of Alzheimer Disease [3, 4]. First, we worked with the clinical psychologists to perform MMSE (mini-mental state examination), CDR (Clinical Dementia Rating scale), ANT (Attendant Networks Test) and STM (Short-term Memory test) for outpatients at XinHuan Hospital of Dalian University. Second, physicians interviewed each outpatient subject to get full clinical information, and then selected twenty-five potential MCI (Mild Cognitive Impairment) patients based on their clinical experiences. Then we collected MR imaging data to get the structural data for 8 regions (left/right hippocampus, left/right thalamus, left/right entorhinal and left/right amygdala) based on the previous literature. We segmented and registered data to the MNI template for imaging data. Lastly, we integrated all the behavioral, clinical and brain structural data into our proposed learning method for further diagnosis.
In order to overcome limitations of the ordinary algorithm that imposes a previous ordering on the domain attributes that restricts the number of Bayesian structures to be learned, in this paper, we present a novel structure learning method to construct the Bayesian network from these data, and the method need not prescribe a previous sequence. Using the proposed method, we first constructed a classification and regression tree to define conditional probability distributions. Then, we used the K2 algorithm to learn a Bayesian network structure from the data. Our results indicated that the MCI was mainly dependent on the hippocampus, thalamus and STM score. Although the proposed method slightly sacrificed performance efficiency, it still gave significant improvements in accuracy. In addition, not only can the method do feature selection, but it also can handle discrete and continuous inputs. In the future, we will extend the algorithm to handle missing data and hidden variables .
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 30670699, Ministry of Education Grant NCET-06-0277 and 021010.
- Chen R, Herskovits EH: Network analysis of mild cognitive impairment. NeuroImage. 2006, 29: 1252-1259. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herskovits EH, Gerring JP: Application of a data-mining method based on Bayesian networks to lesion-deficit analysis. NeuroImage. 2003, 19: 1664-1673. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00231-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antonucci A, Zaffalon M: Fast algorithms for robust classification with Bayesian nets. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 2007, 44: 200-223. 10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cruz-Ramirez N, Acosta-Mesa HG, Carrillo-Calvet H, Alonso Nava-Fernandez L, Barrientos-Martinez RE: Diagnosis of breast cancer using Bayesian networks: A case study. Comput Biol Med. 2007, 37: 1553-1564. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eaton D, Murphy K: Bayesian structure learning using dynamic programming and MCMC. The 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2007, [http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Papers/eaton-uai07.pdf]Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.