Volume 8 Supplement 2

Sixteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2007

Open Access

Stability of splay states for pulse-coupled neuronal networks: finite size versus finite pulse-width effects

  • Alessandro Torcini1, 3Email author,
  • Ruediger Zillmer1, 3,
  • Roberto Livi2, 3 and
  • Antonio Politi1
BMC Neuroscience20078(Suppl 2):P18

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-S2-P18

Published: 6 July 2007

The dynamics of collective states observed in globally coupled neuronal networks is still an open problem. In particular, although it is claimed that the periodic firing state ("splay state") is stable only for excitatory coupling [1], counterexamples have been found for inhibitory coupling as well [2]. Moreover, the stability of the splay states has been analyzed only in the mean field limit [1, 3, 4]. Our aim is to investigate simultaneously, for a pulse-coupled network of leaky integrate-and fire neurons, the effect of the number N of neurons as well as of the pulse-width of the post-synaptic potentials. Finite-N networks can be studied by suitably modifying the map-like formalism [5, 6] usually adopted to implement numerically the model. As a result, we find that the stability of the splay state depends crucially on a parameter that is proportional to the width of the delivered pulses rescaled to the average interspike interval. More precisely, we show that the Floquet spectrum of eigenvalues is made of two components, one of which coincides with that one predicted by the mean-field analysis [1]. Depending on the value of the relevant parameter, the second component may be responsible for the occurrence of instabilities which in turn suggest the failure of the continuum limit approximation. Finally, for sufficiently small pulse-width we observe that the splay state can be stable even for inhibitory coupling.

Authors’ Affiliations

Istituto dei Sistemi Complessi – CNR
Department of Physics
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare


  1. Abbott LF, van Vreeswijk C: Asynchronous states in networks of pulse-coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E. 1993, 48: 1483-1490. 10.1103/PhysRevE.48.1483.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Zillmer R, Livi R, Politi A, Torcini A: Desynchronization in diluted neural networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006, 74: 036203-10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. van Vreeswijk C: Partial synchronization in population of pulse-coupled oscillators. Phys Rev E. 1996, 54: 5522-5537. 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.5522.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mohanty PK, Politi A: A new approach to partial synchronization in globally coupled rotators. J Phys A: Math Gen. 2006, 39: L415-L418. 10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/L01.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Jin Z: Fast convergence of spike sequences to periodic patterns in recurrent networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2002, 89: 208102-10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208102.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bressloff PC, Coombes S: A dynamical theory of spike train transitions in networks of integrate-and-fire oscillators. SIAM J Appl Math. 2000, 60: 820-841. 10.1137/S0036139998339643.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Torcini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.