An extremely rich repertoire of bursting patterns during the development of cortical cultures
© Wagenaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 01 September 2005
Accepted: 07 February 2006
Published: 07 February 2006
We have collected a comprehensive set of multi-unit data on dissociated cortical cultures. Previous studies of the development of the electrical activity of dissociated cultures of cortical neurons each focused on limited aspects of its dynamics, and were often based on small numbers of observed cultures. We followed 58 cultures of different densities – 3000 to 50,000 neurons on areas of 30 to 75 mm2 – growing on multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) during the first five weeks of their development.
Plating density had a profound effect on development. While the aggregate spike detection rate scaled linearly with density, as expected from the number of cells in proximity to electrodes, dense cultures started to exhibit bursting behavior earlier in development than sparser cultures. Analysis of responses to electrical stimulation suggests that axonal outgrowth likewise occurred faster in dense cultures. After two weeks, the network activity was dominated by population bursts in most cultures. In contrast to previous reports, development continued with changing burst patterns throughout the observation period. Burst patterns were extremely varied, with inter-burst intervals between 1 and 300 s, different amounts of temporal clustering of bursts, and different firing rate profiles during bursts. During certain stages of development bursts were organized into tight clusters with highly conserved internal structure.
Dissociated cultures of cortical cells exhibited a much richer repertoire of activity patterns than previously reported. Except for the very sparsest cultures, all cultures exhibited globally synchronized bursts, but bursting patterns changed over the course of development, and varied considerably between preparations. This emphasizes the importance of using multiple preparations – not just multiple cultures from one preparation – in any study involving neuronal cultures.
These results are based on 963 half-hour-long recordings. To encourage further investigation of the rich range of behaviors exhibited by cortical cells in vitro, we are making the data available to other researchers, together with Matlab code to facilitate access.
Dissociated cultures of cortical cells grown on multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) have been used in many studies of network physiology because of their superior accessibility compared to in vivo models, in terms of electrical recording and stimulation, pharmacological manipulation and imaging. These studies described fundamental properties of network activity patterns [1–5], plasticity [6, 7], learning in vitro [8–12], applications of cell cultures in pharmacological testing , and models of epilepsy .
Cortical cells in culture retain many of the properties found in their in vivo context, but important differences assuredly exist [3, 8]. Therefore, the development of neuronal cultures in vitro deserves to be documented, as a baseline against which the results of experimental manipulations can be compared. This baseline could also be used in a future comparison with in vivo activity patterns. Previous investigations of development in vitro all agreed that population bursts are a major component of cultures' activity patterns, and have each focused on different aspects of the activity patterns exhibited by such cultures. While single-cell bursts commonly occur in dissociated cultures, the MEA literature does not focus on them, since intracellular recording techniques would be more suitable. Segev et al. [3, 15] found that the statistical properties of the distribution of inter-burst intervals (IBIs) and burst sizes resembled those of avalanches. Opitz et al.  found that spike bursts are associated with a synchronous increase in [Ca2+]i throughout the neuronal population. Mukai et al.  focused on development changes in IBI values and spatial extent of bursts, and found that the complexity of burst patterns increased after about two weeks in vitro. Van Pelt et al. [5, 18] focused on the temporal structure of the firing-rate envelope of bursts during development, finding that bursts gradually grew longer during the first weeks in vitro, but suddenly became very short and sharply defined after about a month. It is worth noting that population bursts have also been observed in cultures from many neural tissues, including spinal cord , and retina , as well as during mammalian development in vivo, in cortex , hippocampus , and thalamus , but here we will focus on cortical cultures.
Each of the previous papers uses different terminology to describe bursts and burst patterns, resulting in a patchwork of descriptions that is difficult to integrate. This situation is exacerbated by the wide variety of neuronal activity that neuroscientists call 'bursts'. MEA electrophysiologists mostly discuss population bursts, i.e., brief periods during which the spike rate of many cells or electrodes exceeds the baseline rate severalfold. Moreover, most of the previous studies were based on observations of small numbers of cultures from unspecified numbers of plating batches. Therefore they may have underestimated the variety of activity patterns that different cultures can exhibit. Here, we present an in-depth study of the development of burst patterns in cortical cultures over the course of the first five weeks in vitro, based on a dataset encompassing a total of 963 half-hour-long recordings and 36 overnight recordings from 58 cultures of five different sizes and densities. The cultures exhibited a surprisingly wide spectrum of spontaneous activity patterns, characterized by population bursts of qualitatively different shapes, sizes and interval distributions.
'Small & sparse'
Plating volume (μL)
Density of suspension (cells/μL)
Number of cells plated (nominal)
Culture diameter (mm) a
4.9 ± 0.4
3.1 ± 0.3
4.9 ± 0.4
3.1 ± 0.3
4.9 ± 0.4
Drop thickness (mm)a,b
1.69 ± 0.24
1.06 ± 0.23
1.69 ± 0.24
1.06 ± 0.23
1.69 ± 0.24
Density at 1 div (×103 cells/mm2) c
2.5 ± 1.5
1.6 ± 0.6
0.60 ± 0.24
0.30 ± 0.16
0.11 ± 0.06
Number of cultures followed
Number of batches
Classification of population bursts
The quantitative details of the development of different cultures varied widely. Indeed, cultures from different platings could show qualitatively different patterns during development. For instance, superbursts were observed in only about half of all cultures. Therefore, we made analogues of Figure 1 for each of the cultures studied available online (see below, under Additional files). To allow easier comparison between the burst patterns exhibited by cultures of different densities and different stages of development, we devised a classification of burst patterns based on the following criteria. (For full details, see Methods.)
Burstiness Any burst spanning fewer than 5 electrodes was termed tiny. The first stage of classification was whether a recording (half an hour of activity) contained no bursts at all (example in Figure 3B1), only tiny bursts (Figure 3B2), or also larger bursts. Recordings with larger bursts were further classified, as follows.
Size distribution In some recordings, bursts had very similar sizes (Figure 3B3), in others a wide range of burst sizes occurred (Figure 3B4). Sometimes, this range was a continuum, sometimes large and smaller bursts were quite distinct, with very few bursts of intermediate size occurring. Accordingly, recordings were given the labels fixed size, variable size, and bimodal size distribution.
Long-tailed bursts Bursts usually had a fast onset, followed by a somewhat slower decay. Sometimes, the main part of the decay was followed by an extended period of several seconds during which several channels continued bursting, resulting in a 'tail' of elevated firing rates (Figure 3B5). If most large bursts in a recording had such tails, the label long-tailed was applied to it. (See Methods for details.)
Burst rates Burst patterns were further classified by the rate of occurrance of bursts. Usually, burst rates were relatively constant over time, either with regular spacing (Figure 3B3), or with more chaotic spacing (Figure 3B4). Sometimes, the burst rate varied by more than an order of magnitude over the course of a recording (Figure 3B8). In that case, the burst rate was considered highly variable.
Superbursts Many cultures went through a developmental period during which a second level of organization appeared in the temporal distribution of bursts. Bursts occurred in periodic trains of about 4–12, with several minutes of tonic firing between trains (Figure 3B6). If most large bursts occurred in such 'superbursts', the recording was labeled accordingly. Recordings with superbursts were further subclassified based on whether the number of bursts per superburst was highly conserved (regular superbursts), variable but typically less than ten (short), or variable with a higher average (long). Usually, the number of spikes decayed in successive bursts inside superbursts. If not, the shape was considered inverted (Figure 3B7). Mixtures of 'normal' and 'inverted' superbursts were never observed.
Based on this classification, a more concise overview of observed burst patterns was constructed (Figure 3A).
Array-wide synchronized bursting usually began after 5–7 div in dense cultures, and later in sparser cultures. Small bursts involving 1–5 electrodes were often observed several days before global synchronization. Burst patterns changed with culture age, and these changes were still on-going after 30 div. Thus it does not appear that cultures were truly mature at this age, in contrast to a previous report . Figure 3A reveals that cultures from the same plating batch developed along strikingly parallel lines. In contrast, even between batches of the same density large differences existed both in terms of development speed and in terms of the type of burst patterns exhibited. This was most likely not due to the details of the medium replacement schedule, since the 'feeding' times (indicated in the figure by vertical thin black bars) did not coincide with marked developmental changes. Finally, the sparsest cultures we studied had very low burstiness, consistent with observations in low-density cultures used by other researchers for patch-clamp experiments in studies of synaptic plasticity.
Development of firing rates
Development of burst duration, propagation speed, and size
Responses to electrical stimulation
Sensitivity to movement
Sources of variability
We observed that different cultures had some degree of maintained personality. That is, differences between cultures exceeded the day-to-day differences in the behavior of individual cultures. Moreover, even batches seem to have distinguishing features. To substantiate these observations, we quantified the sources of variability between firing rate patterns using a difference index (DI) defined as follows:
Here, f1 and f2 are the mean ASDRs in the two recordings. This DI is normalized to lie between 0 (if the ASDRs are the same) and 1 (if one is much larger than the other). Analogously, we computed a DI of the burstiness index from each pair of recordings. We used DIs for a number of comparisons:
Day to day DIs computed between all possible pairs of recordings made from the same culture on consecutive days. The mean DI at a given age is a quantitative measure of day-to-day variability at that age.
Sister cultures DIs computed between all possible pairs of recordings made on the same day from cultures from the same plating batch.
Non-sister cultures DIs computed between all possible pairs of recordings made at the same developmental age from cultures from different plating batches.
The nature of bursts in culture
Importance of sampling from multiple platings
Despite our best efforts to keep conditions stable, we found substantial differences between the development of cultures from different platings. These differences may have been due to characteristics preserved from the animals from which the cultures derived, or they may have originated later during development. The fact that cross-plating variability increased with age in vitro (Figure 12) supports the second possibility. Whatever the root cause, the observation that cross-plating variability was larger than variability between sister cultures implies that it is crucial to use cultures from several different platings to obtain unbiased results. Therefore it is critical to report not only the number of cultures used, but also the number of platings from which these cultures stem, whenever dissociated cultures are used in network physiology experiments.
Importance of ensuring a stable recording environment
Even though all our recordings took place inside the incubator in which the cultures were maintained, the physical act of connecting an MEA to the recording device had a substantial synchronizing effect on cultures' activity patterns (see Figure 10 and Figure 11). These effects were generally short-lived (lasting only a few minutes), but for experiments where the effect of a manipulation is compared to baseline conditions, such non-stationarity can pose serious problems. Therefore, it is important to connect MEAs to the recording device well ahead of starting experiments. Great care must be taken that the effect of pharmacological manipulations is not confounded by the effect of physical perturbations.
The present results generate a variety of new questions. For instance: Why does stimulation of older cultures yield fewer bursts than in younger cultures? Why does the number of spikes in a burst scale exponentially with the number of participating electrodes, rather than linearly, which one would naïvely expect? Why do sister cultures develop along more similar lines than non-sisters? Is this due to preservation of properties from the tissue from which they were obtained, or due to the inevitable slight inter-batch differences in culture maintenance? Why does mechanical perturbation transiently increase synchronization? And why does that only happen at a certain developmental stage? We have only begun to investigate these questions.
By following the development of a larger number of cultures than any previous report based on MEA recordings, we have found that the range of spiking dynamics exhibited by networks of cortical cells in vitro is much more complex than previous publications suggest. While the activity of all dense cultures became dominated by array-wide bursts as the cultures matured, the sizes, shapes, and temporal patterns of these bursts varied widely. Indeed, the range of behaviors of these cultures is so rich that this paper can only begin to describe the diverse activity patterns present in these recordings. Therefore, we invite others to join us in the study of activity patterns of networks of cortical cells in vitro. To this end, we have made the entire dataset used for this paper available on the web (see Additional files, below). (Send access requests to: Steve Potter email@example.com.) Researchers may download our recordings of spike waveforms (a total of 45 GB, compressed), or reduced files containing only time stamps and electrode IDs (a total of 4 GB). Example Matlab code to efficiently access the files, and documentation are available as well.
By allowing comparison with activity patterns occurring during healthy development and disease in vivo, an understanding of the development of complex dynamics in the firing behavior of cortical networks in vitro will increase the relevance of culture models to in vivo neuroscience.
We used MEAs with 59 electrodes with a diameter of 30 μm, purchased from Multichannel Systems (Reutlingen, Germany). The electrodes were organized in a square grid with the corners missing, spaced 200 μm center-to-center. One electrode on the edge of the array was also absent; its place was taken by a large ground electrode. MEAs were pre-treated with poly-ethylene-imine (PEI) and laminin, as previously described . Laminin (0.02 mg/mL in Neurobasal medium) was applied directly to the center of the array, in drops of either 5 or 20 μL. To prevent premature evaporation, drops of 15 μL medium were spread around the inside edge of the culture dish, and the dishes were sealed with Teflon membranes impermeable to water . Laminin drops were removed by vacuum aspiration just prior to plating cells.
Cells (neurons as well as glia) were obtained from the cortices of (E18) rat embryos using procedures described before . Briefly, timed-pregnant Wistar rats were sacrificed using CO-32 inhalation, according to NIH approved protocols, at day 18 of gestation. Embryos were removed and decapitated, and the anterior part of the cortices (including somatosensory, motor, and association areas) were dissected out. At the rostral edge, the boundary with the olfactory bulb was used as a landmark; at the caudal edge, the third ventricle and the boundary with the lateral horn of the hippocampus were used as landmarks. Striatum and hippocampus were not included. Cortices from several embryos from the same litter were combined, cut into 1mm3 chunks, and dissociated using papain followed by trituration. Cells were spun down onto 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to remove debris, then resuspended in Neurobasal medium with 10% horse serum, and passed through a 40 μm strainer. Cell density was determined using a haemocytometer. The cell suspension was stirred by pipetting with a wide-bore 1 mL tip (Hamilton, Reno, NV) before taking either 5 or 20 μL and plating it on the still-wet laminin-coated area. (The cell suspension always spread out to exactly cover the wet area left by the laminin solution after it had been aspirated out.) Several plating densities were used, as summarized in Table 1. Recordings were obtained from 58 cultures from eight dissections, performed over the course of nine months.
Cultures were maintained in Teflon-sealed dishes, in an incubator with 5% CO2, 9% O2, 35°C and 65% relative humidity . After 24–36 h, the plating medium was replaced by a serum-containing DMEM-based medium adapted from Jimbo et al. : DMEM (Irvine Scientific) has osmolarity 330 mOsm, from 154.6mM K+, 1.8 mM Ca2+, 0.8 mM Mg2+; 10% Horse serum (Hyclone), 0.5 mM GlutaMax (used in preference to glutamine to avoid the toxicity associated with glutamine breakdown), 1 mM Sodium pyruvate, 0.06 IU/mL Insulin, pH: 7.3. Half of the medium was replaced approximately every five days in most experiments, as indicated by black bars in Figure 3A. To test whether feeding schedule affected activity, all medium was replaced every seven days in some experiments (N = 3). This did not result in significantly different activity patterns compared with sister cultures. Feeding always took place after the day's recording session, to allow at least 12 hours for transient effects to disappear before the next recording.
To improve consistency between batches, all dissociations and handling of cultures was done by a single experimenter (DAW), while dissections were performed by one lab technician (Sheri McKinney).
Recording and stimulation
Recording took place in the same incubator used for maintaining cultures, using a pre-amplifier from Multichannel Systems (Reutlingen, Germany). Excess heat from the pre-amplifier electronics was removed using a custom Peltier-cooled platform, keeping the culture at 35°C. Recording started immediately after transferring each culture into the recording device. MEABench  was used for data acquisition and online spike detection. Most recording sessions lasted 30 minutes, but in some cases (N = 36), a recording was allowed to continue overnight, to collect a library of longer recordings, and to be able to test whether activity patterns observed shortly after moving a culture around were substantially different from activity patterns produced by the culture at other times.
After most recordings from plating batches 1–7, cultures were probed using biphasic voltage pulses of ± 0.8 V, 400 μs per phase , applied at 0.3 s intervals sequentially to all electrodes using our custom stimulator . Stimulation artifacts were removed in software using the SALPA algorithm . A total of 50 pulses were delivered to each electrode per session. Whether or not cultures were exposed to electrical stimuli did not result in significantly different activity patterns compared to sister cultures (N = 3; data not shown).
Spikes were detected online using a threshold based detector as upward or downward excursions beyond 4.5× estimated RMS noise . Spike waveforms were stored, and used to remove duplicate detections of multiphasic spikes. A variety of spike waveform shapes was observed on many electrodes, but distinct clusters in waveform space were not usually seen, presumably because many cells contributed to the spike train at each electrode, especially during bursts. Also during bursts, overlapping waveforms were a common occurrence, making spike sorting problematic. Thus, sorting was not attempted, and all results in this paper are based on multiunit data. Readers with promising spike sorting algorithms are especially welcome to test them on our dataset, which is available online in its entirety.
Bursts were detected using the SIMMUX algorithm . Briefly, each electrode trace was searched for burstlets: sequences of at least four spikes with all inter-spike intervals less than a threshold (set to 1/4 of that electrode's inverse average spike detection rate, or to 100 ms if the electrode's average spike detection rate was less than 10 Hz). Any group of burstlets across several electrodes that overlapped in time was considered a burst.
Classification of population bursts
After detection, bursts and burst patterns were classified based on the following criteria:
One or several days before culture-wide bursts first appeared, bursts on one, or sometimes two or three, electrodes were often observed. These bursts had a shorter duration and smaller spike count than culture-wide bursts, and were thus considered a separate class, termed tiny bursts. Tiny bursts were not further analysed. Recordings with more than just tiny bursts were further classified, as follows.
Let N* be the number of spikes in the 3rd largest burst (in a given half-hour long recording from a particular culture). Bursts with at least N* spikes were termed large. Bursts with at least N* spikes, but less than N*, were termed medium. Non-tiny bursts with fewer than N* spikes were termed small. If there were more medium bursts than large bursts, the burst size was considered variable (Figure 3B4). Otherwise, if there were more small bursts than large bursts, the burst size distribution was considered bimodal. If there were more large bursts than medium or small bursts, the burst size was considered fixed (Figure 3B3).
Non-tiny bursts with a 'tail' of at least 3 seconds during which the ASDR remained elevated by at least 50% above baseline levels were considered long-tailed. If at least half of all large and medium bursts in a recording were long-tailed, it was deemed dominated by long-tailed bursts (Figure 3B5).
If the highest burst rate (determined from the shortest time span containing 10 inter-burst intervals) differed from the lowest burst rate (determined from the longest time span containing only 3 inter-burst intervals) by a factor 10 or more, the burst rate was considered highly variable (Figure 3B8).
If at least 50% of all large and medium bursts occurred inside tight clusters (inter-cluster intervals at least 10× longer than intra-cluster intervals), the recording was deemed to be dominated by superbursts. If the variance of the number of bursts per superburst was small (less than half of its average), the superbursts were considered regular (Figure 3B6). If not, they were considered short if the average number of bursts per superburst was less than 10, or long otherwise. If the number of spikes decayed in successive bursts inside superbursts, the superburst shape was considered normal. If it grew, the shape was considered inverted (Figure 3B7).
These criteria were hand-picked to highlight important features of bursts, thus making the classification more intuitive than computer-selected criteria would. Note that the classification itself was performed automatically.
Quantification of burstiness
Burst detection is a prerequisite for quantifying burst shapes and burst patterns, but for merely describing the level of burstiness of a recording, it suffices to quantify the temporal clustering of spikes. This was done as described previously : We counted the array-wide number of spikes in non-overlapping 1 s windows, and determined what fraction of the total number of spikes was contained in the 15% most active windows. Since bursts always occupied fewer than 10% of 1 s windows, this number, f15, is close to one if most spikes occur in bursts. Conversely, if spikes are evenly spaced in time, f15 is close to 0.15. We then defined our burstiness index as BI = (f15 – 0.15)/0.85. Thus, BI is normalized between 0 (no bursts) and 1 (all spikes in bursts).
Measuring functional projections
We previously reported that a monopolar biphasic stimulus pulse on one electrode typically evokes very precisely timed responses on a number of other electrodes that are insensitive to synapse blockers . We concluded that stimulation most likely evokes action potentials in axons, which then cause recordable action potentials elsewhere along the axon, or in the cell body by antidromic transmission. By detecting these 'direct responses' and measuring their distances from the stimulation site, one can investigate the distances reached by functional projections in the culture in which the responses were recorded, up to the point where the projections reach beyond the extent of the electrode array. We determined the distribution of distances between all identified precisely timed stimulus-response pairs in a recording, and normalized it by the number of (stimulation site, recording site)-pairs existing in the array for each distance. The median distance of direct responses to stimuli applied to all electrodes of a given culture provides a measure of the typical length of projections in that culture. While biased towards short distances, because projections that extend beyond the edge of the array cannot be adequately accounted for, the 90th percentile of the distribution is a robust lower bound for the maximal length of projections in a culture.
We thank our lab technician, Sheri McKinney. This work was partially supported by NINDS grants NS38628 (to SMP) and NS44134 (to JP), by NIBIB grant EB00786 (to SMP), by the NSF Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, and by the Whitaker Foundation.
- Maeda E, Robinson HPC, Kawana A: The mechanisms of generation and propagation of synchronized bursting in developing networks of cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 1995, 15 (10): 6834-6845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gross GW, Kowalski JM: Origins of activity patterns in self-organizing neuronal networks in vitro. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 1999, 10 (7): 558-564.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Segev R, Shapira Y, Benveniste M, Ben-Jacob E: Observations and modeling of synchronized bursting in two-dimensional neural networks. Phys Rev E. 2001, 6401: [Art. no.-011920].Google Scholar
- Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (35): 11167-11177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Pelt J, Wolters PS, Corner MA, Rutten WLC, Ramakers GJA: Long-term characterization of firing dynamics of spontaneous bursts in cultured neural networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004, 51 (11): 2051-2062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maeda E, Kuroda Y, Robinson HPC, Kawana A: Modification of parallel activity elicited by propagating bursts in developing networks of rat cortical neurones. Eur J Neurosci. 1998, 10: 488-496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jimbo Y, Tateno T, Robinson HPC: Simultaneous induction of pathway-specific potentiation and depression in networks of cortical neurons. Biophys J. 1999, 76 (2): 670-678.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Potter SM, DeMarse TB: A new approach to neural cell culture for long-term studies. J Neurosci Methods. 2001, 110 (1–2): 17-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeMarse TB, Wagenaar DA, Blau AW, Potter SM: The neurally controlled animat: Biological brains acting with simulated bodies. Auton Robot. 2001, 11: 305-310.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shahaf G, Marom S: Learning in networks of cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2001, 21 (22): 8782-8788.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eytan D, Brenner N, Marom S: Selective adaptation in networks of cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (28): 9349-9356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruaro ME, Bonifazi P, Torre V: Toward the neurocomputer: Image processing and pattern recognition with neuronal cultures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2005, 52 (3): 371-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morefield SI, Keefer EW, Chapman KD, Gross GW: Drug evaluations using neuronal networks cultured on microelectrode arrays. Biosens Bioelectron. 2000, 15 (7–8): 383-396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagenaar DA, Madhavan R, Pine J, Potter SM: Controlling bursting in cortical cultures with closed-loop multi-electrode stimulation. J Neurosci. 2005, 25 (3): 680-688.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Segev R, Benveniste M, Hulata E, Cohen N, Palevski A, Kapon E, Shapira Y, Ben-Jacob E: Long-term behavior of lithographically prepared in vitro neuronal networks [Art. no.-118102]. Phys Rev Lett. 2002, 88 (11).Google Scholar
- Opitz T, De Lima AD, Voigt T: Spontaneous development of synchronous oscillatory activity during maturation of cortical networks in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 2002, 88 (5): 2196-2206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mukai Y, Shiina T, Jimbo Y: Continuous monitoring of developmental activity changes in cultured cortical networks. Electr Eng Jpn. 2003, 145 (4): 28-37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Pelt J, Corner MA, Wolters PS, Rutten WLC, Ramakers GJA: Long-term stability and developmental changes in spontaneous network burst firing patterns in dissociated rat cerebral cortex cell cultures on multielectrode arrays. Neurosci Lett. 2004, 361 (1–3): 86-89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhoades BK, Gross GW: Potassium and calcium-channel dependence of bursting in cultured neuronal networks. Brain Res. 1994, 643 (1–2): 310-318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris RE, Coulombe MG, Feller MB: Dissociated retinal neurons form periodically active synaptic circuits. J Neurophysiol. 2002, 88: 188-195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiu CY, Weliky M: Spontaneous activity in developing ferret visual cortex in vivo. J Neurosci. 2001, 21 (22): 8906-8914.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leinekugel X, Khazipov R, Cannon R, Hirase H, Ben-Ari Y, Buzsaki G: Correlated bursts of activity in the neonatal hippocampus in vivo. Science. 2002, 296 (5575): 2049-2052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weliky M, Katz LC: Correlational structure of spontaneous neuronal activity in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus in vivo. Science. 1999, 285 (5427): 599-604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamioka H, Maeda E, Jimbo Y, Robinson HPC, Kawana A: Spontaneous periodic synchronized bursting during formation of mature patterns of connections in cortical cultures. Neurosci Lett. 1996, 206 (2–3): 109-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Habets AMMC, Van Dongen AMJ, Van Huizen F, Corner MA: Spontaneous neuronal firing patterns in fetal rat cortical networks during development in vitro: a quantitative analysis. Exp Brain Res. 1987, 69: 43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bakkum DJ, Shkolnik AC, Ben-Ary G, Gamblen P, DeMarse TB, Potter SM: Removing some 'A' from AI: Embodied cultured networks. Embodied Artificial Intelligence. Edited by: Iida F, Steels L, Pfeifer R. 2004, Springer-Verlag, 130-145.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Corner MA, Van Pelt J, Wolters PS, Baker RE, Nuytinck RH: Physiological effects of sustained blockade of excitatory synaptic transmission on spontaneously active developing neuronal networks – an inquiry into the reciprocal linkage between intrinsic biorhythms and neuroplasticity in early ontogeny. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002, 26 (2): 127-185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagenaar DA, DeMarse TB, Potter SM: MEABench: A toolset for multi-electrode data acquisition and on-line analysis. Proc 2nd Intl IEEE EMBS Conf on Neural Eng. 2005, 518-521.Google Scholar
- Wagenaar DA, Pine J, Potter SM: Effective parameters for stimulation of dissociated cultures using multi-electrode arrays. J Neurosci Methods. 2004, 138 (1–2): 27-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagenaar DA, Potter SM: A versatile all-channel stimulator for electrode arrays, with real-time control. J Neural Eng. 2004, 1: 39-44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagenaar DA, Potter SM: Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting. J Neurosci Methods. 2002, 120 (2): 113-120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bi GQ, Poo MM: Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001, 24: 139-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.