Immunocytochemical evidence for co-expression of Type III IP3receptor with signaling components of bitter taste transduction
© Clapp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001
Received: 23 March 2001
Accepted: 23 April 2001
Published: 23 April 2001
Taste receptor cells are responsible for transducing chemical stimuli into electrical signals that lead to the sense of taste. An important second messenger in taste transduction is IP3, which is involved in both bitter and sweet transduction pathways. Several components of the bitter transduction pathway have been identified, including the T2R/TRB taste receptors, phospholipase C β2, and the G protein subunits α-gustducin, β3, and γ13. However, the identity of the IP3 receptor subtype in this pathway is not known. In the present study we used immunocytochemistry on rodent taste tissue to identify the IP3 receptors expressed in taste cells and to examine taste bud expression patterns for IP3R3.
Antibodies against Type I, II, and III IP3 receptors were tested on sections of rat and mouse circumvallate papillae. Robust cytoplasmic labeling for the Type III IP3 receptor (IP3R3) was found in a large subset of taste cells in both species. In contrast, little or no immunoreactivity was seen with antibodies against the Type I or Type II IP3 receptors. To investigate the potential role of IP3R3 in bitter taste transduction, we used double-label immunocytochemistry to determine whether IP3R3 is expressed in the same subset of cells expressing other bitter signaling components. IP3R3 immunoreactive taste cells were also immunoreactive for PLCβ2 and γ13. Alpha-gustducin immunoreactivity was present in a subset of IP3R3, PLCβ2, and γ13 positive cells.
IP3R3 is the dominant form of the IP3 receptor expressed in taste cells and our data suggest it plays an important role in bitter taste transduction.
Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) is an important second messenger in both bitter and sweet taste transduction. In both pathways, activation of taste receptors stimulates a G protein-coupled cascade resulting in activation of phospholipase C (PLC), which cleaves phosphoinositol bisphosphate (PIP2) to produce the second messengers IP3 and diacylglycerol (DAG). The soluble messenger IP3 binds to receptors located on calcium store membranes, causing release of calcium into the cytosol, while DAG remains in the membrane, where it can activate downstream effectors. While little is known about the role of IP3 in sweet taste transduction, considerable data indicate that IP3 plays an important role in bitter transduction. The first evidence for the involvement of IP3 in bitter transduction was obtained by Akabas et al. , who used Ca2+ imaging to show that the bitter stimulus denatonium causes release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. More recently, biochemical measurements have shown that several bitter compounds elevate IP3 in taste tissue [5–8].
Other studies, however, suggested that a decrease in cAMP, rather than an increase in IP3, mediated bitter transduction. In 1992, a chemosensory specific G protein, α-gustducin, was identified in a subset of taste cells . Alpha-gustducin, which is closely related to the rod and cone transducins, activates PDE to reduce intracellular levels of cAMP . Evidence for gustducin's role in bitter taste came from knockout studies, in which a targeted deletion of α-gustducin resulted in mice with a reduced sensitivity for bitter compounds . More recently, a variety of bitter compounds have been shown to activate gustducin in biochemical assays [11, 12], causing a decrease in intracellular cAMP levels via activation of PDE . It is now known that individual bitter receptors modulate both the IP3 and cAMP pathways (Fig. 1B). Bitter compounds bind to a family of G protein-coupled receptors called the T2R [14, 15] or TRB  receptors, which activate a heterotrimeric G protein consisting of α-gustducin and a βγ complex containing β3  and γ13 . Alpha-gustducin activates PDE to decrease intracellular levels of cAMP , while its βγ partners stimulate PLCβ2 to produce IP3 and DAG .
Although it is clear that IP3 binds to receptors located on intracellular Ca2+ stores, the specific identity of IP3 receptors in taste cells is not known. There are at least 3 known isotypes of IP3 receptors encoded by different genes . Each protein product is about 300 Kda. Four subunits assemble to form a functional channel. Both homomultimeres and heteromultimeres have been reported . The N terminus of each subunit houses the IP3 binding domain while the C terminus anchors the protein to the membrane, is involved in the formation of the tetrameric protein, and forms the Ca2+ pore region. The general structure of each isoform is similar, however they differ in primary sequence, distribution, regulation, and IP3 affinity .
In this study we used immunocytochemical methods to determine which IP3R isoform is expressed in taste cells and to examine the expression patterns of IP3 receptors relative to other proteins known to be important for taste transduction. We report that the Type III IP3 receptor is the dominant isotype expressed in rodent taste cells and that it is primarily found in the same subset of taste cells as other known signaling components of bitter transduction. A preliminary account of this work was published in abstract form .
Co-expression of IP3R3 with known bitter signaling components
IP3R3 is heavily expressed in a large subset of vallate taste cells of both mouse and rat, suggesting that IP3R3 plays a similar role in both species. IP3R3 appears to be located throughout the cytoplasm of taste cells, consistent with its expected location on the smooth endoplasmic membrane . In other cells, IP3 receptors have also been found on the plasma membrane , but because of heavy cytoplasmic labeling, we were unable to resolve whether it was also located on the plasma membrane. One caveat is that antigen retrieval was necessary to observe IP3R3 labeling. However, using this method with α-gustducin, PLCβ2, and γ13 antibodies did not alter their immunoreactivities; similar results were obtained with and without antigen retrieval. Thus, we do not believe that antigen retrieval compromised our interpretation of the results.
Taste cells expressing IP3R3 have an elongate, bipolar morphology, suggestive of Type II taste cells . Indeed, a subset of the IP3R3 immunoreactive taste cells is also immunoreactive for α-gustducin, which has been identified exclusively in Type II cells . However, whether IP3R3 is expressed exclusively in Type II cells awaits further investigation. It is noteworthy that a subset of taste cells does not express IP3 receptors. This raises the question as to whether these cells have intracellular Ca2+ release mechanisms. Ryanodine receptors also mediate release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores, however a previous study showed no effect of ryanodine on bitter taste responses in Necturus taste cells .
IP3R3 immunoreactivity was expressed in the same subset of taste cells as PLCβ2 and γ13, and by inference from other data, β3 . Antibodies against these proteins have been shown to inhibit IP3 formation to bitter compounds in taste cells [8, 17, 18], suggesting that they are important components of the bitter-stimulated IP3 pathway. It is of interest that only a subset of IP3R3 IR cells express α-gustducin, a G protein known to be involved with bitter transduction. These data suggest that alpha subunit(s) in addition to α-gustducin must be involved with the IP3 signaling pathway in α-gustducin negative cells. Several G protein alpha subunits have been identified in taste cells, and are potential candidates for this role. These include α-transducin , Gαi-2, Gαi-3, Gαs , and Gα15 and Gαq . Further experiments will be required to identify the additional alpha subunits that couple to this pathway, and the receptors that activate these G proteins.
In addition to its role in bitter transduction, IP3 is involved in the transduction of artificial sweeteners . Interestingly, mice lacking α-gustducin are compromised in the detection of sweet compounds as well as bitter compounds, suggesting that sweet receptors may also couple to α-gustducin . Approximately two-thirds of the α-gustducin positive vallate taste cells express T2R/TRB receptors . It is possible that the remaining α-gustducin positive vallate taste cells express receptors for synthetic sweeteners, and that they couple to the IP3 signaling pathway. Thus, IP3R3 may be involved with sweet as well as bitter taste transduction.
IP3R3 is widely expressed in cells in a variety of tissues including adult pancreatic islets, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, salivary glands, and brain [29, 30]. Many of these cell types, including taste cells, are polarized, where Ca2+ signals are initiated on the apical membrane and must propagate long intracellular distances. IP3R3 is particularly well suited for this function, since it is the only IP3 receptor isotype that is not inhibited at high Ca2+ concentrations . In fact, under certain conditions, Ca2+ can stimulate IP3R3, making it a likely candidate for participation in the propagation of Ca2+ oscillations. In taste cells Ca2+ oscillations have been observed in response to bitter stimuli (T. Ogura and S.C. Kinnamon, unpub. observations), and it's likely that IP3R3 participates in these Ca2+ oscillations.
Another interesting feature of IP3R3 is that cAMP-dependent phosphorylation can inhibit its activity in pancreatic acinar cells [32, 33]. In these cells, cAMP-dependent phosphorylation decreases Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and slows the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations. These data suggest a possible role for α-gustducin in bitter taste transduction. Specifically, activation of α-gustducin, which decreases intracellular cAMP by activation of PDE , may lead to a decrease in the cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of IP3R3. This would disrupt the negative control of the receptor and potentiate the Ca2+ response. Interestingly, Gαi-2, another alpha subunit heavily expressed in taste cells , also functions to decrease intracellular levels of cAMP and may lead to regulation of IP3R3. Further experiments will be necessary to clarify the role of these alpha subunits in regulation of the IP3 pathway in taste cells.
Materials and Methods
Adult male Sprague Dawley Rats and adult C57/B1 male or female mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Animals were cared for in compliance with the Colorado State University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Rats or mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injections of Sodium Pentobarbitol, 40 mg/Kg (Veterinary Laboratories, Inc., Lenexa, KS). Following anesthetization animals were injected intracardially with heparin (Elkins-Sinn, Inc., Cherry Hill, NJ) and 1% sodium nitrate. Rats were perfused with 80 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde and mice with 30 ml. Following perfusion tongues were removed and immediately placed into fresh 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Ft. Washington, PA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for approximately twenty minutes. Tongues were then put into a 20% sucrose solution in 0.1 M phosphate buffer overnight for cryoprotection. Forty micron sections were cut on a Leitz 1729 digital Kryostat and collected in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH7.2). Following sectioning, the slices were washed in PBS three times for ten minutes each at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was performed by placing sections into a 10 mM sodium citrate solution at 80°C for 30 minutes. This was done to help disrupt protein cross-bridges formed by formalin fixation and expose antigen binding sites. In some experiments the incubation time in sodium citrate was reduced to 5 minutes, and labeling was still apparent. All sections were incubated in blocking solution for 1-2 hours at room temperature. Blocking solution contained 0.3% Triton X-100, 1% normal goat serum, and 1% bovine serum albumin in 0.1 M PBS. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Corporation (St. Louis, MO) unless otherwise noted.
Polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbit against the sequence N1829KKKDDEVDRDAPSRKKAKE1848 near the COOH-terminal domain of human IP3R1 were purchased from Affinity Bioreagents, Inc. (Golden, CO, cat #PA1-901). Polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbit against a synthetic peptide with a sequence derived from the cytoplasmic, NH2-terminal domain of the rat IP3R2 protein (E317LNPDYRDAQNEGKTVRD334), were also purchased from Affinity Bioreagents, Inc. (Golden, CO, cat #PA1-904). Monoclonal mouse anti-IP3 R3 was purchased from Transduction laboratories (Lexington, KY, cat #131220). Monoclonal mouse anti-IP3R3 recognizes the peptide sequence 22-230. Rabbit anti-α-gustducin (cat #SC-395) directed against a peptide fragment containing amino acids 93-113 of α-gustducin; and rabbit anti-PLCβ2 (cat #SC206) were obtained from Santa Cruz laboratories (Santa Cruz, CA). Rabbit anti-γ13 was prepared as described previously . All secondary antibodies were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). These included: Rhodamine Red X anti-rabbit (# 111-295-045), Rhodamine Red X anti-mouse (# 115-295-146), Cy-5 anti-mouse (# 115-175-146), Flourescein (FITC) anti-rabbit (# 711-095-152). Cy-5 anti mouse antibodies were tested on mouse tissue prior to these experiments to insure no background labeling.
Single label Immunocytochemistry
Sections from rat circumvallate papillae were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Controls in which the primary antibodies were excluded were included in each experiment. The primary antibodies rabbit anti-IP3R1 and rabbit anti-IP3R2 were diluted to 1:100 in blocking solution. Mouse anti-IP3R3 was used at 1:50 in blocking solution. Following overnight incubation in primary antibodies, sections were washed three times for ten minutes each in PBS at room temperature. Rabbit anti-IP3R1, rabbit anti-IP3R2, and no primary antibody control sections were then incubated with the secondary antibody Rhodamine Red X anti-rabbit (1:100 in blocking solution) at room temperature for two hours. Mouse anti-IP 3R3 labeled sections, were incubated in Rhodamine anti-mouse. Following incubation with secondary antibodies, sections were washed three times for ten minutes in PBS and mounted on RITE-ON micro slides (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Portsmouth, NH) using Flouromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc., Birmingham, AL, cat# 0100-01) and coverslipped (VWR Scientific, Media, PA). Slides were stored at 4°C.
Double Label Immunocytochemistry
Double-labeled experiments involved incubations with two primary antibodies and subsequent incubation with appropriate secondary antibodies. Rabbit anti-α-gustducin was used at 1:500 in blocking solution. Both rabbit anti-PLCβ2 and rabbit anti-γ13 were used at 1:1000 in blocking solution. Following incubation with primary antibodies, sections were washed in PBS three times for ten minutes each. Both rabbit anti-IP3R1 and rabbit anti-IP3R2 labeled sections were then treated with Rhodamine Red X anti rabbit antibodies (1:100). For IP 3R3 double-labeled sections, Cy-5 anti-mouse secondary antibodies were applied. Rabbit anti-α-gustducin was visualized using FITC anti-rabbit (1:100) secondary antibodies. Both rabbit anti-PLCβ2 and rabbit anti-γ13 were labeled with FITC anti rabbit (1:100). Incubations with secondary antibodies were done at room temperature for two hours. Sections were then washed in PBS three times for ten minutes each, mounted using flouromount-6, and coverslipped.
Lingual sections were viewed with an Olympus Fluoview laser scanning confocal microscope. Sequential scanning techniques were used for some double-label experiments and showed no differences from simultaneous scans. There is no overlap between the excitation and emission spectra for the FITC and Cy5 secondary antibodies used in the double label experiments. Images were captured with an Olympus FVX-IHRT Fluoview Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope. Lasers included Argon 488 nm, HeNe 543 nm, and HeNe 622. Fluoview software was used for data acquisition. Images were processed and printed using Photoshop 6.0 software.
We thank Dr. Vince Dionne for the initial motivation for this study, and Ms. Barbel Böttger for the suggestion of using antigen retrieval. We also thank Dr. Kathryn Medler for technical advice and Dr. Tom Finger for comments on the manuscript. RFM is an Associate Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical institute. This study was supported by NIH grants DC00244 and DC00766 to SCK and DC03155 to RFM.
Note added in proof: Similar results were obtained by Miyoshi et al. and appear in the current issue of Chemical Senses (Chem Senses 26:259-265, 2001).
- Lindemann B: Taste reception. Physiol Rev. 1996, 76: 718-766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilbertson TA, Damak S, Margolskee RF: The molecular physiology of taste transduction. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000, 10: 519-527. 10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00118-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glendinning JI, Chaudhari N, Kinnamon SC: Taste transduction and molecular biology. In: The Neurobiology of Taste and Smell (Edited by Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D,) 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Liss;. 2000, 315-351.
- Akabas MH, Dodd J, Al-Awqati Q: A bitter substance induces a rise in intracellular calcium in a subpopulation of rat taste cells. Science. 1988, 242: 1047-1050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang PM, Verma A, Bredt DS, Snyder SH: Localization of phosphatidylinositol signaling components in rat taste cells: role in bitter taste transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 7395-7399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spielman AI, Huque T, Nagai H, Whitney G, Brand JG: Generation of inositol phosphates in bitter taste transduction. Physiol Behav. 1994, 56: 1149-1155. 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90359-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spielman AI, Nagai H, Sunavala G, Dasso M, Breer H, Boekhoff I, Huque T, Whitney G, Brand JG: Rapid kinetics of second messenger production in bitter taste. Am J Physiol. 1996, 270: C926-931.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang L, Shanker YG, Dubauskaite J, Zheng JZ, Yan W, Rosenzweig S, Spielman AI, Max M, Margolskee RF: Ggamma13 colocalizes with gustducin in taste receptor cells and mediates IP3 responses to bitter denatonium. Nat Neurosci. 1999, 2: 1055-1062. 10.1038/15981.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McLaughlin SK, McKinnon PJ, Margolskee RF: Gustducin is a taste-cell-specific G protein closely related to the transducins. Nature. 1992, 357: 563-569. 10.1038/357563a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong GT, Gannon KS, Margolskee RF: Transduction of bitter and sweet taste by gustducin. Nature. 1996, 381: 796-800. 10.1038/381796a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz-Avila L, McLaughlin SK, Wildman D, McKmnon PJ, Robichon A, Spickofsky N, Margolskee RF: Coupling of bitter receptor to phosphodiesterase through transducin in taste receptor cells. Nature. 1995, 376: 80-85. 10.1038/376080a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ming D, Ruiz-Avila L, Margolskee RF: Characterization and solubilization of bitter-responsive receptors that couple to gustducin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 8933-8938. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8933.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yan W, Sunavala G, Rosenzweig S, Dasso M, Brand JG, Spielman AI: Bitter taste transduced by PLC-beta(2)-dependent rise in IP(3) and alpha-gustducin-dependent fall in cyclic nucleotides. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001, 280: C742-751.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Hoon MA, Adler E, Feng L, Guo W, Zuker CS, Ryba NJ: T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell. 2000, 100: 703-711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adler E, Hoon MA, Mueller KL, Chandrashekar J, Ryba NJ, Zuker CS: A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. Cell. 2000, 100: 693-702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsunami H, Montmayeur JP, Buck LB: A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse. Nature. 2000, 404: 601-604. 10.1038/35007072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossler P, Boekhoff I, Tareilus E, Beck S, Breer H, Freitag J: G protein betagamma complexes in circumvallate taste cells involved in bitter transduction. Chem Senses. 2000, 25: 413-421. 10.1093/chemse/25.4.413.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rossler P, Kroner C, Freitag J, Noe J, Breer H: Identification of a phospholipase C beta subtype in rat taste cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 1998, 77: 253-261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel S, Joseph SK, Thomas AP: Molecular properties of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. Cell Calcium. 1999, 25: 247-264. 10.1054/ceca.1999.0021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clapp TR, Stone LM, Kinnamon SC: Type III IP3 receptors are in rat taste cells. Chem Senses. 2000, 25: 624-625.Google Scholar
- Otsu H, Yamamoto A, Maeda N, Mikoshiba K, Tashiro Y: Immunogold localization of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) receptor in mouse cerebellar Purkinje cells using three monoclonal antibodies. Cell Struct Funct. 1990, 15: 163-173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pumplin DW, Yu C, Smith DV: Light and dark cells of rat vallate taste buds are morphologically distinct cell types. J Comp Neurol. 1997, 378: 389-410. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970217)378:3<389::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang R, Tabata S, Crowley HH, Margolskee RF, Kinnamon JC: Ultrastructural localization of gustducin immunoreactivity in microvilli of type II taste cells in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 2000, 425: 139-151. 10.1002/1096-9861(20000911)425:1<139::AID-CNE12>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogura T, Mackay-Sim A, Kinnamon SC: Bitter taste transduction of denatonium in the mudpuppy Necturus maculosus. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 3580-3587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McLaughlin SK, McKinnon PJ, Robichon A, Spickofsky N, Margolskee RF: Gustducin and transducin: a tale of two G proteins. Ciba Found Symp. 1993, 179: 186-196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusakabe Y, Yasuoka A, Asano-Miyoshi M, Iwabuchi K, Matsumoto I, Arai S, Emori Y, Abe K: Comprehensive study on G protein alpha-subunits in taste bud cells, with special reference to the occurrence of Galphai2 as a major Galpha species. Chem Senses. 2000, 25: 525-531. 10.1093/chemse/25.5.525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusakabe Y, Yamaguchi E, Tanemura K, Kameyama K, Chiba N, Arai S, Emori Y, Abe K: Identification of two alpha-subunit species of GTP-binding proteins, Galpha15 and Galphaq, expressed in rat taste buds. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1403: 265-272. 10.1016/S0167-4889(98)00062-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernhardt SJ, Naim M, Zehavi U, Lindernann B: Changes in IP3 and cytosolic Ca2+ in response to sugars and non-sugar sweeteners in transduction of sweet taste in the rat. J Physiol. 1996, 490: 325-336.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blondel O, Takeda J, Janssen H, Seino S, Bell GI: Sequence and functional characterization of a third inositol trisphosphate receptor subtype, IP3R-3, expressed in pancreatic islets, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, and other tissues. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 11356-11363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Smedt H, Missiaen L, Parys JB, Henning RH, Sienaert I, Vanlingen S, Gijsens A, Himpens B, Casteels R: Isoform diversity of the inositol trisphosphate receptor in cell types of mouse origin. Biochem J. 1997, 322: 575-583.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hagar RE, Burgstahler AD, Nathanson MH, Ehrlich BE: Type III InsP3 receptor channel stays open in the presence of increased calcium. Nature. 1998, 396: 81-84. 10.1038/23954.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giovannucci DR, Sneyd J, Groblewski GE, Yule DI: Modulation of InsP3 receptor properties by phosphorylation: targeting of PKA to InsP3 receptors shapes oscillatory calcium signals in pancreatic acinar cells. J Korean Med Sci. 2000, 15 Suppl: S55-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giovannucci DR, Groblewski GE, Sneyd J, Yule DI: Targeted phosphorylation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors selectively inhibits localized Ca2+ release and shapes oscillatory Ca2+ signals. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 33704-33711. 10.1074/jbc.M004278200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.