Skip to main content
  • Poster presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Assessing performance of directed functional connectivity measures in the presence of common source

The mixing problem of electroencephalography (EEG) in the presence of common source could affect directed functional connectivity measures, resulting in an incorrect directionality of information flow between two signals. Here we introduce directed Weighted Phase Lag Index (dWPLI), a signed version of Weighted Phase Lag Index (WPLI) and compare this measure to Granger Causality (GC), Symbolic Transfer Entropy (STE), Phase Slope Index (PSI), and directed Phase Lag Index (dPLI) under common source effects. Robustness of the measures was tested in both analytic and simulating ways.

For the simulated time series, signals were generated from unidirectionally coupled autoregressive model and linearly mixed to achieve volume conduction and common noise effects.

As expected from the analytic calculation, dPLI and dWPLI were unaffected by the volume conduction while PSI, GC and STE were largely affected. (Figure 1A). The mean percentages of false identification were 14.00±7.66, 22.35±4.78, 27.38±7.04, 1.99±1.36, and 1.63±1.28, for the GC, STE, PSI, dPLI, and dWPLI, respectively.

Figure 1
figure 1

A. Directionalities of five directed connectivity measures under the volume conduction effect. Positive Directionality Index (DI) implies correct directionality of information flow. As M (mixing ratio) increases, the DIs of GC, STE and PSI decrease. However, as expected in analytic calculation, the dPLI and dWPLI are not affected. (DI is defined as a normalized information flow.) B. Directionalities of five directed connectivity measures under the common noise effect. As M (noise-to-signal ratio) increases, the DIs' signs of GC, STE and PSI change while those of dPLI and dWPLI do not.

For the common noise case, only dPLI and dWPLI had their signs preserved. (Figure 1B). The mean percentages of false identification were 30.14 ± 16.86, 49.74 ± 16.63, 34.72 ±10.23, 2.68 ± 1.90, and 2.34 ± 1.55.

Furthermore, the dWPLI outperformed dPLI for the common noise case (p <0.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) which was also predicted from analytic calculation.

Present study shows the common source effects might lead to biased results with incorrect directionality of information flow. Among the five directed functional connectivity measures, dWPLI is much less affected by common source effects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heonsoo Lee.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Lee, H. & Kim, S. Assessing performance of directed functional connectivity measures in the presence of common source. BMC Neurosci 16 (Suppl 1), P124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P124

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-16-S1-P124

Keywords