Open Access

Pattern changes of EEG oscillations and BOLD signals associated with temporal lobe epilepsy as revealed by a working memory task

  • Helka FB Ozelo1, 3,
  • Andréa Alessio1, 2,
  • Maurício S Sercheli1,
  • Elizabeth Bilevicius2,
  • Tatiane Pedro2,
  • Fabrício RS Pereira4,
  • Jane M Rondina5,
  • Benito P Damasceno2,
  • Fernando Cendes2 and
  • Roberto JM Covolan1, 6Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Neuroscience201415:52

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-52

Received: 4 December 2013

Accepted: 14 April 2014

Published: 25 April 2014

Abstract

Background

It is known that the abnormal neural activity in epilepsy may be associated to the reorganization of neural circuits and brain plasticity in various ways. On that basis, we hypothesized that changes in neuronal circuitry due to epilepsy could lead to measurable variations in patterns of both EEG and BOLD signals in patients performing some cognitive task as compared to what would be obtained in normal condition. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the cerebral areas involved in EEG oscillations versus fMRI signal patterns during a working memory (WM) task in normal controls and patients with refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) associated with hippocampal sclerosis (HS). The study included six patients with left MTLE-HS (left-HS group) and seven normal controls (control group) matched to the patients by age and educational level, both groups undergoing a blocked design paradigm based on Sternberg test during separated EEG and fMRI sessions. This test consisted of encoding and maintenance of a variable number of consonant letters on WM.

Results

EEG analysis for the encoding period revealed the presence of theta and alpha oscillations in the frontal and parietal areas, respectively. Likewise, fMRI showed the co-occurrence of positive and negative BOLD signals in both brain regions. As for the maintenance period, whereas EEG analysis revealed disappearance of theta oscillation, fMRI showed decrease of positive BOLD in frontal area and increase of negative BOLD in the posterior part of the brain.

Conclusions

Generally speaking, these patterns of electrophysiological and hemodynamic signals were observed for both control and left-HS groups. However, the data also revealed remarkable differences between these groups that are consistent with the hypothesis of reorganization of brain circuitry associated with epilepsy.

Keywords

EEG fMRI Alpha and theta rhythms Working memory Temporal lobe epilepsy

Background

The electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used since 1930’s decade to monitor, measure and record electrical activity in patients with neurological disorders, especially epileptic discharges in patients with epilepsy and seizure disorders [1, 2]. Since then, its applications have been also extended to the study of cognitive functions, which are tested by means of evoked potentials generated in response to external stimulation [3]. One of the most important attributes of this technique is its high temporal resolution (<1 ms) [4], in opposition to its three main limitations: (1) low spatial resolution compromising the precise location of the electrical oscillations origin in the brain, (2) low sensitivity due to its restriction to the more superficial layers of the cerebral cortex, and (3) the requirement of a large cortical area to be simultaneously activated in order to generate enough potential that can be registered by the scalp electrodes [5].

On the other hand, the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been explored since the early 1990s to identify hemodynamic response related to neural activity in the brain, not only of normal controls but also of neurological patients, during resting-state or motor, visual and cognitive tasks [610]. One of the most relevant advantages of this neuroimaging technique is its high spatial resolution (~1 mm), which allows the detection of activated regions even in deep cerebral structures (e.g. medial temporal lobe structures) [11]. In contrast, the most relevant disadvantages are (1) its indirect results that are based on the increase of hemodynamic response in certain cerebral areas during determined period or task, which is interpreted as an indirect measurement of neural activity, and (2) its low temporal resolution, which implicates in a delay between the stimulus presentation and the increase of oxygen consumption and, consequently, cerebral blood flow in the cerebral regions involved in a specific period or task [10, 12].

More recently, EEG and fMRI have been used in simultaneous or separated acquisitions [1318], in order to optimize both temporal and spatial resolutions, and to establish possible correlations between electrophysiological and hemodynamic signals. However, it is important to highlight that the simultaneous acquisition requires hardware compatibility and specific software for artifact removal [1921].

Only a few studies have aimed to investigate similarities, as well as differences, between EEG and fMRI data obtained during a working memory (WM) task in normal controls [15, 17, 22, 23]. When it comes to long-term memory (LTM), however, it is well-established in the literature the relationship between LTM deficits, hippocampal sclerosis (HS), and refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), while the consequences of MTLE and HS on working memory (WM) remain unclear. MTLE has been considered to compromise LTM but not WM [24]. However, recent evidence suggests WM is also impaired [2527], with WM being secondarily disrupted by propagation of epileptic activity from the epileptogenic zone to eloquent cortex responsible for WM function [28], or primarily affected by dysfunction of medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures, mainly the hippocampus, critically involved in WM processes [29, 30]. Former evidence, even for a material-specific role of MTL on WM had been shown by studies of verbal WM in patients with left TLE using transcranial magnetic stimulation over the temporal areas [31], and studies of spatial WM in patients with right hippocampal damage [32]. Therefore, our main motivation for studying WM in MTLE patients with HS is to further investigate the role of MTL in WM processes by comparing the cerebral areas involved in EEG oscillations versus fMRI signals patterns, during a WM task in controls and patients with MTLE associated with HS.

Methods

Both control and left-HS groups were submitted to a working memory task with verbal content during two separated EEG and fMRI sessions. The EEG session was performed in the morning, while the fMRI session was carried out in the afternoon of the current day.

Ascertainment of subjects

Seven normal controls (1 man and 6 women; mean age 37.1 ± 9.0 years) and six patients (1 man and 5 women; mean age 35.7 ± 8.1 years) with refractory MTLE were included in this study. For this purpose, all of them signed an Informed Consent approved by the ethics committee of UNICAMP Medical School.

The normal controls had no history of neurological and/or psychiatric disorders, and were matched to the patients by age and educational level. The patients, who were followed at our epilepsy clinic, were previously diagnosed with simple and complex partial seizures of MTL origin on clinical history, left interictal epileptiform discharges exclusively over left mid-inferomesial temporal region on serial EEG recordings, left HA and other signs of unilateral left HS in the absence of any other cerebral lesion elsewhere on MRI, and verbal LTM deficits on neuropsychological evaluation [33]. Whereas the HA was defined by a MRI volumetric analysis protocol [34], other signs of HS on MRI were evaluated clinically by one of the authors with experience in neuroimaging investigation in epilepsies (F.C.).

Working memory task

The working memory task was based on the Sternberg test [35]. Each trial began with the presentation of a white screen (4 s), which was followed by the presentation of an array of eight consonant letters (8 s). The individuals were instructed to try to memorize the letters colored black (ranging from three to seven), while ignoring the letters colored green (ranging from five to one, respectively). Soon afterwards, this stimulus array was replaced by an array of three dots (14 s), in which they were requested to try to keep the black letters in their minds. Then, a single probe letter (colored red) was presented (3 s) and they were instructed to press a button only if the letter was among those memorized. Finally, a feedback screen with a “yes” or “no” response (1 s) was presented (Figure 1). Each run consisted of 20 trials (30 s per trial) and was separated from the next one by a two minutes interval, when a black screen was presented. The individuals completed four runs in 46 minutes.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2202-15-52/MediaObjects/12868_2013_Article_3500_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Working memory paradigm. Below each frame is the duration of each test block in seconds.

EEG recordings and analysis

EEG data were recorded separately from fMRI data in order to avoid gradient artifacts, by a 32-channel system (Brain Products, Munich, Germany) referenced to the right mastoid (TP10), at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz with a bandwidth of 0.5 to 70 Hz. Electrodes were positioned using the standard 10-20 system, and their impedances were kept around 5 kΩ. The acquired data were then exported to EEGLAB software (http://www.sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab/) for preprocessing and frequency analysis. The preprocessing consisted of applying a high-pass filter of 1 Hz to remove eye blink artifacts, and a low-pass filter of 30 Hz to remove muscle artifacts (typically set at 20-50 Hz) and electrical noise (60 Hz). The frequency distribution analyses were separately carried out for the four runs of each subject, and for the two main periods (encoding versus retention) of the experiment. For the encoding analysis, one epoch was extracted beginning one second before and ending four seconds after the start of the encoding period. For the retention analysis, three consecutive epochs of four seconds were extracted, leaving aside one second before the first epoch and one second after the last one.

Soon afterwards, all epochs were submitted to extended infomax ICA using runica from the EEGLAB toolbox. ICA components with abnormal amplitudes were identified as artifacts and, for this reason, removed [36]. All epochs were then submitted to frequency analysis by FFT decomposition, and the main components were identified and related to expected rhythms.

fMRI acquisitions and analysis

fMRI images were acquired in a bottom/up interleaved mode, by using a 2 T Elscint Prestige MR scanner with a gradient echo-planar imaging (EPI) protocol (TR = 2000 ms, TE = 45 ms, FOV = 378 × 226 mm2, matrix = 128 × 72, in-plane voxel size = 3.0 × 3.0 mm2[37], 20 slices no gap, slice thickness = 6 mm, flip angle = 90°). Three hundred and twenty cerebral volumes with 20 slices each were obtained in each run, adding up to four EPI series per subject. The functional images acquired were then (1) reconstructed and temporally reorganized, (2) transformed from DICOM-2D into ANALYZE-3D format, by using the MRIcro software (http://www.sph.sc.edu/comd/rorden/mricro.html), and finally (3) slice timed, realigned, normalized (MNI standard template), smoothed (6 mm/FWHM) and analyzed, by using the SPM software package (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/). Through a Matlab script, it was calculated a mean smoothed image of the four EPI series of each subject and, finally, a mean smoothed image representing each group (control and left-HS groups).

For data analysis, the gamma function was adopted with window length of 32 and order 1 [3840], as well as the threshold of p = 0.0001 (uncorrected for multiple comparisons) and cluster size of 125 contiguous voxels [41]. For contrast design, we created three conditions [encoding, retention, probe] and assigned the values [1, 0, 0] and [0, 1, 0] to analyze the encoding and retention periods, respectively. The probe condition was not analyzed, but it was designed with null value to not act as baseline condition.

Results

The two groups were similar as for age (control: M: 37.1/SD: 9.0 years; left-HS: M: 35.7/SD: 8.1 years), educational level (more than 10 years), and correct answers percentage in the WM recognition test (control: M: 91.1/SD: 6.9; left-HS: M: 89.5/SD: 7.2).

EEG results

Since it was not possible to perform a quantitative group analysis because the EEGLAB software requires time and channels consistency for all individual within the same group, we performed a quantitative individual analysis by using ICA decomposition. These ICA decompositions gave rise to the frequencies values found for each subject of each group. Finally, the frequencies oscillations detected were separated for the two groups. Since the EEG data from two individuals in the control group were too much noisy, they were left out of the final analysis (Additional file 1).

During the encoding period, there was the presence of frontal (mainly in Fz) oscillations ranging from 5 to 7 Hz for both groups, characterizing the theta rhythm. However, it was not possible to discriminate whether these oscillations were originated from frontal or prefrontal structures, due to the limited spatial resolution provided by the 32-channel EEG system used. In addition, there were parietal (mainly in Pz) oscillations ranging from 9 to 10.5 Hz, characterizing the alpha rhythm. These oscillations were more left-sided (P3) in the control group, whereas bilateral without predominance in the patient group. There were also frontal, central and parietal (Fz, F4, Cz, Pz, P3 and P4) frequencies around 17-20 Hz in three patients, characterizing the beta rhythm.

During the retention period, there were alpha oscillations in posterior regions for both control (Pz and P3) and left-HS (Pz, P3 and P4) groups, with absence of theta oscillations in either group.

Finally, these EEG channel locations were related to Brodmann areas [42] (see Additional file 1).

fMRI results

Additional file 2 shows the cerebral areas of positive and negative BOLD signals in both control and left-HS groups for WM encoding and maintenance periods.

In the control group, data analysis of the WM encoding period revealed positive BOLD in: (1) cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral > left posterior portion of superior frontal gyrus and medial frontal gyrus; (3) left inferior frontal gyrus; (4) bilateral > left precentral, supramarginal and angular gyrus; (5) left superior parietal lobe, fusiforme gyrus, medial portion of inferior temporal gyrus and insular cortex; (6) bilateral putamen; (7) bilateral lingual gyrus; and (8) bilateral cerebellar cortex. For the WM maintenance, positive BOLD was found in: (1) left superior and medial frontal gyrus; (2) bilateral > left inferior frontal gyrus; (3) left precentral and angular gyrus; (4) left superior parietal lobe; and (5) bilateral cerebellar cortex (Figure 2a).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2202-15-52/MediaObjects/12868_2013_Article_3500_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

fMRI results to the control group. BOLD activation (red) and deactivation (blue) to (a) encoding period and (b) retention period.

Moreover, in the control group, data analysis of the WM encoding period showed negative BOLD in: (1) bilateral anterior and posterior portions of cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral superior frontal gyrus; (3) bilateral > right medial frontal gyrus; (4) right inferior frontal gyrus; (5) bilateral > left supramarginal gyrus; (6) bilateral angular gyrus; (7) bilateral precuneus; (8) bilateral > left superior temporal gyrus; (9) right fusiforme and inferior temporal gyrus; and (10) left insular cortex. For the WM maintenance, negative BOLD was detected in: (1) bilateral anterior and posterior portions of cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral superior frontal gyrus; (3) right medial frontal gyrus; (4) bilateral supramarginal gyrus; (5) bilateral > right angular gyrus; (6) bilateral superior parietal lobe; (7) bilateral cuneus and precuneus; (8) right inferior temporal gyrus; (9) bilateral lingual gyrus; and (10) bilateral cerebellar cortex (Figure 2b).

In the left-HS group, the data analysis of the WM encoding period revealed the presence of positive BOLD in: (1) cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral > left superior frontal gyrus; (3) bilateral > right medial frontal gyrus; (4) bilateral inferior frontal gyrus; (5) bilateral > left precentral gyrus; (6) bilateral supramarginal and angular gyrus; (7) bilateral superior parietal lobe; (8) bilateral lingual gyrus; and (9) bilateral cerebellar cortex. For the WM maintenance, positive BOLD was found in: (1) left superior frontal gyrus; (2) bilateral inferior frontal gyrus; (3) left angular gyrus; (4) left superior parietal lobe; and (5) bilateral cerebellar cortex (Figure 3a).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2202-15-52/MediaObjects/12868_2013_Article_3500_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

fMRI results to the left-HS group. BOLD activation (red) and deactivation (blue) to (a) encoding period and (b) retention period.

In addition, in the left-HS group, the data analysis of the WM encoding period showed negative BOLD in: (1) bilateral anterior and posterior portions of cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral superior frontal gyrus; (3) bilateral > right medial frontal gyrus; (4) left supramarginal gyrus; (5) bilateral angular gyrus; (6) bilateral precuneus; (7) left superior temporal gyrus; and (8) bilateral cerebellar cortex. For the WM maintenance, negative BOLD was detected in: (1) bilateral anterior and posterior portions of cingulate gyrus; (2) bilateral superior frontal gyrus; (3) right medial and inferior frontal gyrus; (4) bilateral supramarginal and angular gyrus; (5) bilateral superior parietal lobe; (6) bilateral cuneus and precuneus; (7) right amygdala; (8) bilateral caudate and internal capsule; (9) bilateral lingual gyrus; and (10) bilateral cerebellar cortex (Figure 3b).

Discussion

As already presented, there was no significant difference between control and left-HS group with regard to the results of WM recognition test. This finding is in agreement with Tudesco et al. (2010) [43], who did not detect WM deficits in patients with MTLE associated with HS by means of classic neuropsychological evaluation.

Separated EEG and fMRI data collected in the control group

The EEG results for the control group during the WM encoding period revealed theta oscillations (5-6 Hz) in the frontal area, with peak amplitude in the Fz electrode. This result agrees with some studies in the literature, which have assigned the so-called frontal midline theta rhythm (fmθ) to possible dipolar sources located in the dorsal portion of the anterior cingulated cortex and in the medial prefrontal cortex [15, 4446], and related it to the performance on cognitive tasks that requires a high level of attention, such as WM tests [44, 45, 47]. Other studies have also associated this increase in theta oscillations in frontal region with the increase in working memory load [15, 17, 44], emphasizing the preponderant role of frontal lobe structures to the WM encoding and maintenance processes. However, it is important to highlight that we just analyzed the presence or absence of oscillatory rhythms during encoding and maintenance stages, but not the amplitude variations of these rhythms in relation to the amount of items loaded in the WM. On the contrary, WM maintenance did not show theta oscillations, being in disagreement with some other findings in the literature. Some authors detected theta oscillations [48], while other also correlated it to the number of items to be sustained in WM by normal controls [15, 17, 44].

On the other hand, the EEG results for both WM encoding and maintenance periods demonstrated the presence of alpha oscillations (9-10.5 Hz) in the parietal area, with peak amplitude in the Pz and P3 electrodes, slightly dislocated to the left cerebral hemisphere. According to Gevins et al. (1997) [44], the alpha rhythm is detected not only in the encoding but also in the maintenance stages of WM. However, in opposition to what happens with the theta rhythm, its amplitude tends to decrease with the increase of WM demand.

Although the majority of the studies have focused on the theta and alpha oscillations, some authors have also found delta [49, 50] and gamma [51, 52] oscillations in normal controls during working memory tasks.

With respect to the fMRI results for the control group during the WM encoding period, a positive BOLD signal was found in the bilateral > left frontal midline area, corresponding to the same region of theta rhythm peak location on the EEG recording. During WM maintenance, a positive BOLD was also detected in the same frontal midline area, although presenting decreased intensity and extension, corresponding to the disappearance of the fmθ on the EEG.

Likewise, a positive BOLD signal was identified in the bilateral > left and left parieto-occipital areas in the WM encoding and maintenance periods, respectively, coinciding with the alpha rhythm location on the EEG. Only in the encoding period, other positive BOLD signal sources were found in the left temporal region, as well as in more medial and deep cerebral structures, but without any corresponding rhythmic activity on the EEG. This lack of oscillatory rhythms in certain cerebral areas is probably due to the EEG low sensitivity to detect electrophysiological signals arising from medial/deep structures, such as putamen, insular cortex, and fusiform and lingual gyrus.

In both periods, there was co-occurrence of positive and negative BOLD signals, which were distributed in adjacent but not coincident cerebral regions. During the WM encoding, the distribution of these positive versus negative signals was more counterbalanced in terms of number and extension. Conversely, during the WM maintenance, there was a clear negative signal predominance that remained basically at the same locations, although with larger extension. Nonetheless, there is still a lot of controversy in the literature concerning the relationship between the WM stage (encoding or maintenance) and its associated BOLD signal (positive or negative). Some authors [53, 54] have related the maintenance period to the positive signal (“task positive network”), while others [15, 17, 22, 55] have associated it with the negative signal (“default mode network”). Maybe the positive BOLD signals detected during the encoding period are related to the memorizing effort (“task positive network”) of the selected items, whereas the more concentrated and restricted positive BOLD identified during the maintenance period is associated with the sustaining effort (“default mode network”). This sustaining effort may also involve more inhibitory mechanisms, which are expressed by more negative BOLD signals in the fMRI images.

Separated EEG and fMRI data collected in letf-HS group

In similarity with the control group, left-HS group EEG results revealed the presence of theta oscillations (5-7 Hz) in the frontal area during the WM encoding, but not in the WM maintenance period. Nevertheless, while these theta oscillations were more concentrated in Fz for the controls, they were more distributed between Fz and Cz for the patients during the WM encoding. In addition, similarly to the controls, the EEG results for the left-HS group demonstrated the presence of alpha oscillations (9-10 Hz) in the parietal region (mainly in Pz), during both WM encoding and maintenance periods. However, these alpha oscillations were more extensive and bilateral (P3 and P4) for the patients, whereas they were more left-sided (P3) for the controls. Taken together, these findings indicate a more widespread central theta and bilateral alpha oscillations for the left-HS group, probably to compensate for their left mesial temporal dysfunction.

In the left-HS group, in contrast to the control group, other frequencies oscillations around 17 Hz, 18 Hz and 20 Hz, consistent with the beta rhythm, were also observed in the frontal, central and parietal (Fz, F4, Cz, Pz, P3 and P4) areas in three patients during the WM encoding, and in two of them during the WM maintenance. In other studies using similar WM paradigms (Sternberg task), significant positive correlations between beta/gamma and the BOLD signal have been found more focally than the correlations in lower frequency bands (theta and alpha), which are localized in larger cortical networks, e. g. in the default mode network (DMN) [22]. These local field potential oscillations in the beta/gamma range, highly correlated to the BOLD response, probably represent neuronal assembly dynamics cognitive processing [56]. On the other hand, our finding of other oscillatory rhythms in the left-HS group may indicate a reorganization of the patients´ neuronal network involved in the WM task, as an attempt to overcome the left hippocampal system dysfunction.

As regards fMRI results for the left-HS group during the WM encoding period, a positive BOLD signal was found in the frontal midline area, matching with the frontal midline theta rhythm location on the EEG recording. During the WM maintenance, a decrease of this signal was observed, which was in accordance with the disappearance of the theta oscillations. Other frontal regions also presented positive signals, such as the lateral middle and inferior frontal and precentral gyrus. However, whereas these activations were bilateral > left for the controls, they were bilateral for the patients. Likewise, a positive BOLD was identified in the bilateral and left parieto-occipital areas in the WM encoding and maintenance periods, respectively, coinciding with the alpha rhythm location on the EEG. Nonetheless, in opposition to the controls who exhibited bilateral > left positive signals, the patients showed bilateral positive signals during the encoding period. Conjointly, these findings suggest a more bilateral engagement of frontal and parietal regions, without right or left predominance, or a greater involvement of right frontal and parietal structures for the encoding stage in the left-HS group. Finally, in contrast to controls, no positive BOLD signal was found in the temporal area during WM encoding or maintenance periods in left-HS patients, probably due to their hippocampal lesion.

Similarly to controls, there were: (1) coexistence of positive and negative BOLD signals, which were distributed in adjacent cerebral regions in both WM encoding and maintenance; and (2) the encoding period was characterized by a more counterbalanced distribution of positive versus negative signals, while the maintenance period was marked by a clear negative signal predominance. On the other hand, the most important difference between the two groups was that, while controls had exhibited positive and negative BOLD signals in temporal area for both WM encoding and maintenance, the patients had no positive and less negative signals in this cerebral region for encoding and maintenance periods, respectively. In general, these results are in line with other studies [5760] indicating, from different experimental contexts, network reconfiguration induced by neuronal damage associated with MTLE.

Limitations

The reduced patient sample may be seen as one of the drawbacks of the present study. Its main purpose, however, is to present evidence of changes in patterns of EEG and fMRI signals that may be associated with brain plasticity due to epilepsy. Certainly, a more extensive study, including right-HS patients, would be needed to further explore this finding. Another limitation comes from the coarse resolution of the EPI images acquired in this study. While some authors [6163] have found bilateral symmetrical hippocampal activation in normal controls and bilateral-asymmetrical hippocampal activation in MTLE patients, we did not find clear hippocampal activations. This is most likely due to partial volume effects, since in low resolution images nonactivating white matter is averaged with the signal from hippocampal gray matter leading to loss of BOLD signal [62]. Additionally, it should be added a restriction we had on the analysis of the EEG data. The EEGLAB software used in this study did not allow perform a quantitative group analysis, since it requires time and channels consistency for all individuals within the same group, which was not achieved. Thus, a quantitative analysis was performed individually using ICA decomposition, which resulted in values of frequencies found for each subject in each group. Despite this limitation, it was possible to find consistency in the results of individuals in each group.

Conclusions

EEG and fMRI are brain mapping techniques that rely on different aspects of the neurophysiological processes underlying brain dynamics and whose respective characteristics are interrelated by mechanisms that are still not well understood. For instance, the correlation between EEG rhythms and BOLD-fMRI signal in working memory studies remains a quite controversial subject. The objective of this work was to compare the cerebral areas involved in EEG oscillations versus fMRI signal patterns during a WM task in normal controls and patients with refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis.

For the control group, there was strong correspondence between the theta (Fz) and alpha (Pz and P3) rhythms locations on EEG recordings and the positive and negative BOLD signals on the fMRI. We found: (1) involvement of bilateral > left cerebral areas in both WM periods, and (2) while the encoding period was characterized by the counterbalanced distribution of positive and negative BOLD signals, the maintenance period was marked by the clear negative signal predominance (DMN).

On the other hand, for the left-HS group, there was also a correspondence between the locations of theta (Fz e Cz) and alpha (Pz, P3 e P4) rhythms and the positive and negative BOLD signals. Compared to controls, we observed in the patients group: (1) the same patterns of distribution of BOLD signals for WM encoding and maintenance periods, (2) absence and decreased number of temporal structures with positive and negative signals, respectively, during the encoding period, possible due to the presence of the hippocampal pathology, and (3) engagement of bilateral cerebral regions, without side predominance, emphasizing the role of both left and right cerebral hemispheres for WM processing, probably to compensate for its medial temporal dysfunction.

As a whole, these results reveal that there are characteristic patterns of EEG and fMRI signals generated under working memory task which present peculiar features for healthy subjects and epilepsy patients. These features are specific to each group and possibly indicate differentiation in the neuronal circuitry organization involved in WM function resulting from the pathological condition.

Notes

Abbreviations

WM: 

Working memory

MTLE: 

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

HS: 

Hippocampal sclerosis

EEG: 

Electroencephalogram

fMRI: 

Functional magnetic resonance imaging

BOLD: 

Blood oxygenation level dependent

HA: 

Hippocampal atrophy

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

ICA: 

Independent component analysis

FFT: 

Fast Fourier transform

EPI: 

Echo-planar imaging

MNI: 

Montreal Neurological Institute

SPM: 

Statistical parametric mapping.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Study supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP (Grant numbers: 2005/54908-7, 2011/50043-2 and 2012/10037-6; 2013/07559-3).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neurophysics Group, Gleb Wataghin Physics Institute, University of Campinas
(2)
Neuroimaging Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas
(3)
Department of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Education, Federal University of São Carlos
(4)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire
(5)
Sobbel Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, University College London
(6)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Física "Gleb Wataghin". Rua Sérgio Buarque de Holanda, 777 - Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz

References

  1. Gibbs FA, Gibbs EL, Lennox WG: Epilepsy, a paroxysmal cerebral dysrhythmia. Brain. 1937, 60: 377-388. 10.1093/brain/60.4.377.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gibbs FA, Gibbs EL, Lennox WG: Electroencephalographic classification of epileptic patients and control subjects. Arch Neurol (Chicago). 1943, 50: 111-128. 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1943.02290200011001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva FH: Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999, 110: 1842-1857. 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Babiloni C, Pizzella V, Gratta CD, Ferretti A, Romani GL: Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009, 86: 67-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Smith SJM: EEG in the diagnosis, classification, and management of patients with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005, 76: ii2-ii7.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blamire A, Ogawa S, Ugurbil K, Rothman D, McCarthy G, Ellermann JM, Hyder F, Rattner Z, Shulman RG: Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992, 89: 11060-11073.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinke RM, Hu X, Stillman AE, Kim SG, Merkle K, Salmi R, Ugurbil K: Magnetic resonance functional imaging of Broca's area during internal speech. Neuroreport. 1993, 4: 675-678. 10.1097/00001756-199306000-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim SG, Ashe J, Georgopoulos AP, Merkle K, Ellermann JM, Menon RS, Ogawa S, Ugurbil K: Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. J Neurophysiol. 1993, 69: 297-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim SG, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle K, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: Hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. Science. 1993, 261: 615-617. 10.1126/science.8342027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim SG, Ugurbil K: Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain. J Neurosci Methods. 1997, 74: 229-243. 10.1016/S0165-0270(97)02252-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim SG, Ogawa S: Insights into new techniques for high resolution functional MRI. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002, 12: 607-615. 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00355-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A: Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001, 412: 150-157. 10.1038/35084005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamandi K, Salek-Haddadi A, Fish DR, Lemieux L: EEG/functional MR in epilepsy: the Queen Square experience. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004, 21: 241-248. 10.1097/00004691-200407000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaufmann C, Wehrle R, Wetter TC, Holsboer F, Auer DP, Pollmächer T, Czisch M: Brain activation and hypothalamic functional connectivity during human non-rapid eye movement sleep: an EEG/fMRI study – its limitations and an alternative approach. Brain. 2006, 129: 655-667. 10.1093/brain/awh686.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Meltzer JA, Negishi M, Mayes LC, Constable RT: Individual differences in EEG theta and alpha dynamics during working memory correlate with fMRI responses across subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007, 118: 2419-2436. 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gotman J: Epileptic networks studied with EEG-fMRI. Epilepsia. 2008, 49: 42-51.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Scheeringa R, Petersson KM, Oostenveld R, Norris DG, Hagoort P, Bastiaansen MC: Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance. Neuroimage. 2009, 44: 1224-1238. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Laufs H: A personalized history of EEG-fMRI integration. Neuroimage. 2012, 62: 1056-1067. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.039.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandelkow H, Brandeis D, Boesiger P: Good practices in EEG-MRI: the utility of retrospective synchronization and PCA for the removal of MRI gradients artifacts. Neuroimage. 2010, 49: 2287-2303. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Noth U, Laufs H, Stoermer R, Deichmann R: Simultaneous electroencephalografy-functional MRI at 3 T: an analysis of safety risks imposed by performing anatomical references scans with the EEG equipment in place. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012, 35: 561-571. 10.1002/jmri.22843.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullinger KJ, Castellone P, Bowtell R: Best current practice for obtaining high quality EEG data during simultaneous fMRI. J Vis Exp. 2013, 76: e50283-doi:10.3791/50283Google Scholar
  22. Michels L, Bucher K, Lüchinger R, Klaver P, Martin E, Jeanmonod D, Brandeis D: Simultaneous EEG-fMRI during a working memory task: modulations in low and high frequency bands. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (4): e10298-10.1371/journal.pone.0010298. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010298PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Michels L, Lüchinger R, Koenig T, Martin E, Brandeis D: Developmental changes of BOLD signal correlations with global human EEG power and synchronization during working memory. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (7): e39447-10.1371/journal.pone.0039447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039447PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cave CB, Squire LR: Intact verbal and nonverbal short-term memory following damage of the human hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1992, 2: 151-163. 10.1002/hipo.450020207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stretton J, Thompson PJ: Frontal lobe function in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2012, 98 (1): 1-13. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.10.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Winston GP, Stretton J, Sidhu MK, Symms MR, Thompson PJ, Duncan JS: Structural correlates of impaired working memory in hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2013, 54 (7): 1143-1153. 10.1111/epi.12193.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kleen JK, Scott RC, Holmes GL, Roberts DW, Rundle MM, Testorf M, Lenck-Santini PP, Jobst BC: Hippocampal interictal epileptiform activity disrupts cognition in humans. Neurology. 2013, 81: 18-24. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318297ee50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hermann BP, Wyler AR, Richey ET: Wisconsin card sorting test performance in patients with complex partial seizures of temporal-lobe origin. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1988, 10: 467-476. 10.1080/01688638808408253.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Corcoran R, Upton D: A role for the hippocampus in card sorting?. Cortex. 1993, 29: 293-304. 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80182-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Stretton J, Winston GP, Sidhu M, Bonelli S, Centeno M, Vollmar C, Cleary RA, Williams E, Symms MR, Koepp MJ, Thompson PJ, Duncan JS: Disrupted segregation of working memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin. 2013, 2: 273-281.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Duzel E, Hufnagel A, Helmstaedter C, Elger C: Verbal working memory components can be selectively influenced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia. 1996, 34: 775-783. 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00160-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Abrahams S, Morris RG, Polkey CE, Jarosz JM, Cox TC, Graves M, Pickering A: Hippocampal involvement in spatial and working memory, a structural MRI analysis of patients with unilateral mesial temporal lobe sclerosis. Brain Cogn. 1999, 41: 39-65. 10.1006/brcg.1999.1095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Alessio A, Pereira FRS, Sercheli MS, Rondina JM, Ozelo HB, Bilevicius E, Pedro T, Covolan RJM, Damasceno BP, Cendes F: Brain plasticity for verbal and visual memories in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013, 34: 186-199. 10.1002/hbm.21432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bonilha L, Kobayashi E, Cendes F, Li LM: Protocol for volumetric segmentation of medial temporal structures using high resolution 3D MRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004, 22: 145-154. 10.1002/hbm.20023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sternberg S: High-speed scanning in human memory. Science. 1966, 153: 652-654. 10.1126/science.153.3736.652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Delorme A, Makeig S: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004, 134: 9-21. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pereira FR, Alessio A, Sercheli MS, Pedro T, Bilevicius E, Rondina JM, Ozelo HF, Castellano G, Covolan RJ, Damasceno BP, Cendes F: Asymmetrical hippocampal connectivity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: evidence from resting state fMRI. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11: 66-10.1186/1471-2202-11-66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Boynton GM, Engel SA, Glover GH, Heeger DJ: Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. J Neurosci Offic J Soc Neurosci. 1996, 16: 4207-4221.Google Scholar
  39. Rajapakse JC, Kruggel F, Maisog JM, von Cramon DY: Modeling hemodynamic response for analysis of functional MRI time-series. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998, 6: 283-300. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<283::AID-HBM7>3.0.CO;2-#.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Press WH, Teukolski SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP: Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing. 1994, Engand: Cambridge Univeristy PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA: Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009, 4: 423-428. 10.1093/scan/nsp052.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Koessler L, Maillard L, Benhadid A, Vignal JP, Felblinger J, Vespignani H, Braun M: Autometed cortical projection of EEG sensors: Anatomical correlation via the international 10-20 system. Neuroimage. 2009, 46: 64-72. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Tudesco ISS, Vaz LJ, Mantoan MAS, Beizunces E, Noffs MH, Caboclo LOSF, Yacubian EMT, Sakamoto AC, Bueno OFA: Assessment of working memory in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsy Behav. 2010, 18: 223-228. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Gevins A, Smith ME, McEvoy L, Yu D: High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb Cortex. 1997, 7: 374-385. 10.1093/cercor/7.4.374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Onton J, Delorme A, Makeig S: Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory. Neuroimage. 2005, 27: 341-356. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hsieh LT, Ranganath C: Frontal midline theta oscillations during working memory maintenance and episodic encoding and retrieval. Neuroimage. 2013, in pressGoogle Scholar
  47. Ishihara T, Yoshi N: Multivariate analytic study of EEG and mental activity in juvenile delinquents. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972, 33: 71-80. 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90026-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Roberts BM, Hsieh LT, Ranganath C: Oscillatory activity during maintenance of spatial and temporal information in working memory. Neuropsychologia. 2013, 51: 349-357. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Harmony T, Fernández T, Gersenowies J, Galán L, Fernández-Bouzas A, Aubert E, Díaz-Comas L: Specific EEG frequencies signal general common cognitive processes as well as specific task processes in man. Int J Psychophysiol. 2004, 53: 207-216. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.04.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Harmony T: The functional significance of delta oscillations in cognitive processing. Front Integr Neurosci. 2013, 7: 83-eCollection 2013PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Freunberger R, Werkle-Bergner M, Griesmayr B, Lindenberger U, Klimesch W: Brain oscillatory correlates of working memory constraints. Brain Res. 2011, 1375: 93-102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ: Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014, 18 (1): 16-25. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME: The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 9673-9678. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Fransson P: Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005, 26: 15-29. 10.1002/hbm.20113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL: A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 676-682. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Kopell N, Whittington MA, Kramer MA: Neuronal assembly dynamics in the beta1 frequency range permits short-term memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 9: 3779-3784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Powell HW, Richardson MP, Symms MR, Boulby PA, Thompson PJ, Duncan JS, Koepp MJ: Reorganization of verbal and nonverbal memory in temporal lobe epilepsy due to unilateral hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2007, 48: 1512-1525. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01053.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Guedj E, Bettus G, Barbeau EJ, Liegeois-Chauvel C, Confort-Gouny S, Bartolomei F, Chauvel P, Cozzone PJ, Ranjeva JP, Guye M: Hyperactivation of parahippocampal region and fusiform gyrus associated with successful encoding in medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2011, 52: 1100-1109. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03052.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Bonilha L, Nesland T, Martz GU, Joseph JE, Spampinato MV, Edwards JC, Tabesh A: Medial temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with neuronal fibre loss and paradoxical increase in structural connectivity of limbic structures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012, 83: 903-909. 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302476.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Campo P, Garrido MI, Moran RJ, García-Morales I, Poch C, Toledano R, Gil-Nagel A, Dolan RJ, Friston KJ: Network reconfiguration and working memory impairment in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroimage. 2013, 72: 48-54.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Detre JA, Maccotta L, King D, Alsop DC, Glosser G, D’Esposito M, Zarahn E, Aguirre GK, French JA: Functional MRI lateralization of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology. 1998, 50: 926-932. 10.1212/WNL.50.4.926.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Szaflarski JP, Holland SK, Schmithorst VJ, Dunn RS, Privitera MD: High-resolution functional MRI at 3 T in health and epilepsy subjects: Hippocampal activation with picture encoding task. Epilepsy Behav. 2004, 5: 244-252. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.01.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Stretton J, Winston G, Sidhu M, Centeno M, Vollmar C, Bonelli S, Symms M, Koepp M, Duncan JS, Thompson PJ: Neural correlates of working memory in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy - an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2012, 60: 1696-1703. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.126.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ozelo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement