Volume 14 Supplement 1

Abstracts from the Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013

Open Access

How pattern formation in ring networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons depends on the input current regime

  • Birgit Kriener1Email author,
  • Moritz Helias2,
  • Stefan Rotter4, 5,
  • Markus Diesmann2, 3 and
  • Gaute T Einevoll1
BMC Neuroscience201314(Suppl 1):P123

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P123

Published: 8 July 2013

Pattern formation, i.e., the generation of an inhomogeneous spatial activity distribution in a dynamical system with translation invariant structure, is a well-studied phenomenon in neuronal network dynamics, specifically in neural field models. These are population models to describe the spatiotemporal dynamics of large groups of neurons in terms of macroscopic variables such as population firing rates. Though neural field models are often deduced from and equipped with biophysically meaningful properties, a direct mapping to simulations of individual spiking neuron populations is rarely considered. Here, we consider networks with regular topologies, such as rings and lattices, where neuron positions are distributed on regular grids.

Neurons have a distinct identity defined by their action on their postsynaptic targets, i.e., they act either excitatorily or inhibitorily. When the distribution of neuron identities is assumed to be periodic, pattern formation can be observed, given the coupling strength is supercritical, i.e., larger than a critical weight.

Intriguingly, this critical weight is strongly dependent on the characteristics of the neuronal input, i.e., it depends on whether neurons are mean-driven or fluctuation-driven, and very different linearizations of the full non-linear system are relevant in order to assess stability.

We present and analyze these two linearizations, one that is derived directly from the leaky integrate-and-fire dynamics [1], the other from linear response theory in the diffusive coupling limit [2, 3]. In the subcritical weak-coupling regime both approaches describe the firing rates of individual neurons with equally good precision, and by analysis of the respective linear stability we can predict under what conditions the system becomes unstable to spatial perturbations, and which spatial firing pattern will be assumed.

We moreover analyze the effect of structural randomness by rewiring individual synapses or redistributing weights.



We gratefully acknowledge funding by the eScience program of the Research Council of Norway under grant 178892/V30 (eNeuro), the Helmholtz Association: HASB and portfolio theme SMHB, the Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, EU Grant 269921 (BrainScaleS), and by the BMBF grant 01GQ0420 (BCCN Freiburg). All network simulations were carried out with NEST (http://www.nest-initiative.org).

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Science
Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Inst. for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), Jülich Research Centre and JARA
Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen
Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg
Bernstein Center Freiburg


  1. Amit DJ, Tsodyks MV: Quantitative study of attractor neural network retrieving at low spike rates I: Substrate - spikes, rates and neuronal gain. Network. 1991, 2: 259-273. 10.1088/0954-898X/2/3/003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. De la Rocha J, Doiron B, Shea-Brown E, Josic K, Reyes A: Correlation between neural spike trains increases with rate. Nature. 2007, 448 (16): 802-807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tetzlaff T, Helias M, Einevoll GT, Diesmann M: Decorrelation of neural network activity by inhibitory feedback. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012, 8 (8): e1002596-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Kriener et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.