Volume 14 Supplement 1

Abstracts from the Twenty Second Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2013

Open Access

Recurrence and external sources differentially shape network correlations

BMC Neuroscience201314(Suppl 1):P113

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-S1-P113

Published: 8 July 2013

The presence of correlated neuronal activity as such is not surprising, but rather a natural consequence of network connectivity and dynamics, in particular direct synaptic connections and shared local and non-local presynaptic sources [1]. The intriguing feature, however, is the modulation of correlations in relation to behavior [2]. These task-dependent changes may indicate that correlated spike timing is used for the storage, transmission, and processing of information. Moreover, correlated synaptic activation strongly influences the power and the spatial reach of the local field potential [3], a commonly recorded signal in experimental neuroscience.

A theoretical understanding of correlations requires the representation of (1) the recurrent connectivity and (2) external and internal sources of temporally varying or fluctuating signals. Such a theory is currently lacking. In particular it is still unclear how the recently found mechanism of active decorrelation [4], explained by negative feedback on the population level [5], affects the network response to externally applied stimuli. We here extend the theory of correlations in binary networks [6] to external correlated input. We show that (1) for homogeneous external input, the structure of correlations [7] is mainly determined by the local recurrent connectivity, (2) common external inputs provide an additive, homogeneous contribution to the correlation, (3) inhibitory feedback effectively decorrelates neuronal activity, even if neurons receive identical external inputs, and (4) connectivity with approximately identical synapses to excitatory and inhibitory cells increases internally generated fluctuations and pairwise correlations. We further present a new method which self-consistently includes correlations into the established mean-field description to increase the accuracy of the theoretical predictions. As a byproduct of our derivation we show that the cancellation of correlations between the summed inputs to pairs of neurons, in contrast to previous reports [4], does not uniquely determine the structure of correlations, but rather provides only a constraint, which is equivalent to the suppression of fluctuations on the population level [5]. We hope that our work provides a first stepping stone in the endeavor to understand the transformation of impinging correlated external activity into correlated activity between the neurons of the local network.



Partially supported by the Helmholtz Association: HASB and portfolio theme SMHB, the Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, EU Grant 269921 (BrainScaleS), and by the BMBF grant 01GQ0420 (BCCN Freiburg). All network simulations were carried out with NEST (http://www.nest-initiative.org).

Authors’ Affiliations

Inst. of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) and Inst. for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), Jülich Research Centre and JARA
Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen


  1. Gerstein GL, Perkel DH: Science. 1969, 881 (164): 828-830.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kilavik EB, Roux S, Ponce-Alvarez A, Confais J, Gruen S, Riehle A: Journal of Neuroscience. 2009, 29: 12653-12663. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1554-09.2009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lindén H, Tetzlaff T, Potjans TC, Pettersen KH, Grün S, Diesmann M, Einevoll GT: Neuron. 2011, 72 (5): 859-72. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Renart A, de la Rocha J, Bartho P, Hollender L, Parga N, Reyes A, Harris KD: Science. 2010, 327: 587-590. 10.1126/science.1179850.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tetzlaff T, Helias M, Einevoll G, Diesmann M: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012, 8 (8): e1002596-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002596.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ginzburg I, Sompolinsky H: Phys Rev E. 1994, 50 (4): 3171-3191. 10.1103/PhysRevE.50.3171.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gentet L, Avermann M, Matyas F, Staiger JF, Petersen CCH: Neuron. 2010, 65: 422-435. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Helias et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.