Volume 12 Supplement 1

Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open Access

Modeling the LFP footprint of unitary thalamic inputs to sensory cortex

  • Espen Hagen1Email author,
  • Janne C Fossum1,
  • Klas H Pettersen1,
  • Jose-Manuel Alonso2,
  • Harvey A Swadlow3 and
  • Gaute T Einevoll1
BMC Neuroscience201112(Suppl 1):P86

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P86

Published: 18 July 2011

The depth-resolved synaptic local-field potential (LFP) footprint in sensory cortex following firing in individual thalamic projection neurons can be accurately measured by averaging cortical multielectrode (ME) LFP signals over thousands of spontaneous thalamic firing events [1, 2]. This spike-triggered LFP method offers a unique window into the thalamocortical connection. However, the interpretation of the detailed spatiotemporal profile of this LFP footprint is not trivial as the LFP signal reflects a weighted sum over contributions from all dendritic transmembrane currents located in the vicinity of the recording electrode [3]. We here present results from a biophysically detailed computational study of this LFP footprint, focusing on the thalamocortical LFP response in layer 4 of rodent barrel cortex [1]. As illustrated in Fig. 1, the model considers large populations of synaptically activated RS (regular spiking cells) and/or FS (fast-spiking cells) (Fig. 1AB). The computational model, implemented in Python with NEURON, is constrained to predict plausible intracellular EPSCs [4] (Fig. 1C) and EPSPs (Fig. 1D). The model not only predicts the LFP (Fig. 1E), but also the ground-truth CSD (current source-density) (Fig. 1F) that can be used to test CSD estimation methods [5]. Candidate models mimicking experimental findings [1, 2] will be presented.
Figure 1

Model overview. A. Schematic of recording of unitary thalamic projection pattern to layer 4 with thalamic single-unit electrode (el.e), cortical clamp electrodes (el.i) and cortical multielectrode (ME) [1, 2, 4]. B. Example model population of reconstructed RS cells with ME penetrating population. C. EPSCs of model population, black line: average EPSC. D. EPSPs of model population, black line: average EPSP. E. ME LFP response F. ‘Ground truth’ CSD.



Supported by the Research Council of Norway (NevroNor, eNEURO, Notur).

Authors’ Affiliations

Dept. of Mathematical Sciences & Technology, Norwegian Univ. Life Sciences
Dept. of Biological Sciences, SUNY College of Optometry
Dept. of Psychology, University of Connecticut


  1. Swadlow HA, Gusev AG, Bezdudnaya T: Activation of a cortical column by a thalamocortical impulse. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 7766-7773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jin J, Wang Y, Swadlow HA, Alonso JM: Population receptive fields of ON and OFF thalamic inputs to an orientation column in visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2011, 14: 232-238. 10.1038/nn.2729.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pettersen KH, Hagen E, Einevoll GT: Estimation of population firing rates and current source densities from laminar electrode recordings. J Comp Neurosci. 2008, 24: 291-313. 10.1007/s10827-007-0056-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hull C, Isaacson JS, Scanziani M: Postsynaptic mechanisms govern the differential excitation of cortical neurons by thalamic inputs. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 9127-9136. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5971-08.2009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Pettersen KH, Devor A, Ulbert I, Dale AM, Einevoll GT: Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: Effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conductivity discontinuities. J Neurosci Methods. 2006, 154: 116-133. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Hagen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.