Volume 12 Supplement 1
Switching of cortical Up and Down states: reproduction of the Shu-Hasenstaub-McCormick experiment from a conductance-based model
© Weigenand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 18 July 2011
Cortical Up- and Down states are a salient feature of mammalian slow wave sleep and contribute predominantely to the low frequency (1Hz and below) delta power of the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG).The role of slow wave oscillations recently raised considerable attention from the observation that slow waves can be electrically stimulated [1, 2], and that after such a stimulation, a significant increase in memory consolidation can be observed . Cortical slow-waves are comprised of collective depolarzation (Up) and polarization (Down) phases whereby Up phases show an increased firing rate reminescent of wakefulness  and Down states are characterized by comparatively silent levels of neural activity.
A recent experimental demonstration of Up- and Down state switching under electrical stimulation was presented by Shu, Hasenstaub and McCormick . Their experiment showed that in ferret brain slices an Up state could be triggered electrically, as well as that by stimulation during the Up state by an impulse of same polarity, the Up state could be terminated, and the dependence of the Up state duration depending on the impulse amplitude and the
time difference between the two impulses was studied quantitatively.
In a previous study, we have proposed a minimal model mimicking the interplay between recurrent excitation and inhibition controlled by slow adaptive currents . By this quite generic model the experimental time-dependence already can be explained. While the model needs only few parameters, it does not explicitely model neural spiking and it is desired to computationally confirm the approach also from a conductance-based model.
To study stimulation at this level of description, we follow the established conductance-based cortex model by Compte et al.  which incorporates a two-compartment (soma and dendrite) membrane potential within a Hodgkin-Huxley type formalism. We use a one-dimensional distance-dependent randomly connected betwork of 256 regular spiking (RS) and 64 fast-spiking (FS) interneurons, an increase of the size did not significantly affect the qualitative behavior.
We observe self-generated Up-Down states in the absence of stimulation in accordance with the detailed study of . If we apply low stimulus intensities, the Up state duration is trivially affected marginally, as in the experiment, and or high stimulus intensities a termination of Up states is enforced, giving two delimiting lines as in . For intermediate stimulus intensites the termination of the Up state depends on the stimulus intensity such that the experiment is confirmed within the measurement precision in .
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through SFB-654-A8 and GS-CMLS.
- Marshall L, Helgadottir H, Mölle M, Born J: Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature. 2006, 444: 610-613. 10.1038/nature05278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massimini M, Ferrarelli F, Esser SK, Riedner BA, Huber R, Murphy M, Peterson MJ, Tononi G: Triggering sleep slow waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation. PNAS. 2007, 104: 8496-8501. 10.1073/pnas.0702495104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Destexhe A, Hughes SW, Rudolph M, Crunelli V: Are corticothalamic ´up´ states fragments of wakefulness?. Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30: 334-342. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.04.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shu Y, Hasenstaub A, McCormick DA: Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity. Nature. 2003, 423: 288-293. 10.1038/nature01616.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ngo HV, Köhler J, Mayer J, Claussen JC, Schuster HG: Triggering Up states un all-to-all coupled neurons. EPL (Europhysics Letters). 2010, 89: 68002-10.1209/0295-5075/89/68002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Compte A, Sanchez-Vives MV, McCormick DA, Wang X: Celluar and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (<1Hz) and wave propagation in a cortical network model. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 89: 2707-2725. 10.1152/jn.00845.2002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.