Volume 12 Supplement 1

Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open Access

The metabolic efficiency of myelinated vs unmyelinated axons

BMC Neuroscience201112(Suppl 1):P100

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P100

Published: 18 July 2011

Understanding the metabolic efficiency of axons is of critical importance in neuroscience: such as interpreting fMRI and other imaging data, understanding the impact of metabolic conditions and anoxia/hypoxia on the CNS, and finally because current data suggests that metabolic cost places severe limits on neuronal activity[1]. Surprisingly, the metabolic cost of action potential (AP) in myelinated nerve fibers has not been directly estimated, unlike the cost of unmyelinated axons[1, 2]. We calculated the metabolic cost of saltatory APs using detailed stochastic, biophysical models of a human myelinated peripheral axon and compared it to APs in unmyelinated axons of equal diameter. We modelled both axon types using the Modigliani stochastic simulator[3, 4]. For the human myelinated axon, we modelled a heterogeneous multi-compartment cable of 3 cm length. Each Node of Ranvier is surrounded by paranodal regions and separated by a myelinated internode. Ion channel kinetics and axonal geometry were taken from published physiological and anatomical data[5]. Parameters for the unmyelinated axon were taken from[6]. We measured the metabolic cost of APs as the amount of ATP needed for Na-K-pumps to restore ion concentrations after an AP [1, 2, 8].

This allowed us to systematically investigate how metabolic cost depends on factors such as axonal geometry and ion channel densities. E.g comparing myelinated and unmyelinated axons with the same axon diameter of 1µm (fibre diameter including myelin sheath was 3.7 µm) we find the following: single APs at a myelinated axon’s Node of Ranvier have a metabolic cost of 3.5 pmol/cm² ATP per unit membrane area. This is approximately 7 times the amount per AP in hippocampal mossy fibre (0.53 pmol/cm2;[2]) but less than leaky squid axons (5 pmol/cm2). However, Node of Ranvier cover only 0.33% in our myelinated axon. The internodal regions contain hardly any Na+ channels, but a low density of K+ channels (3 µm-2) along internodes, and higher densities at the paranode (80 µm-2). We estimate overall energy consumption based on Na currents at the Node and K along a segment comprising half the internodal fibre on both sides of a node. This yields an AP cost per myelinated axon segment of 0.05 pmol/cm2 ATP per unit membrane area. Thus, per unit length the myelinated axon is 70 times metabolically cheaper than mossy fibers. The added bulk of the myelin allows 13 unmyelinated axons of same diameter to fit in the volume of one myelinated fibre, suggesting that the ratio of energy demand over wiring density is 5 times higher for myelinated fibers vs unmyelinated axons.

Our findings are novel, as the costs of saltatory APs were not calculated from the bottom-up before. They are important, as it was generally assumed that myelinated axons evolved mainly for speed of propagation[7] at the cost of achievable wiring density[6, 8], but energy may be as important: in cortical grey matter unmyelinated axons operate close to the noise limits to wiring miniaturisation[6], yet still contains myelinated axons[9]. We can explain this with a four-way trade-off between time delay, metabolic cost, volume constraints and noise limits to axonal anatomy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by ESPRC.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London
(2)
Department of Computing, Imperial College London

References

  1. Attwell D, Laughlin SB: An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001, 21: 1133-1145. 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alle H, Roth A, Geiger JRP: Energy-Efficient Action Potentials in Hippocampal Mossy Fibers. Science. 2009, 325: 1405-1408. 10.1126/science.1174331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Faisal AA, Laughlin SB, White JA: How reliable is the connectivity in cortical neural networks?. IEEE IJCNN. 2002, 2: 1661-1667.Google Scholar
  4. Faisal AA, Laughlin SB: Stochastic Simulations on the Reliability of Action Potential Propagation in Thin Axons. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007, 3: e79-10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030079.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wesselink WA, Holsheimer J, Boom HBK: A model of the electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibres based on human data. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1999, 37: 228-235. 10.1007/BF02513291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Faisal A, White J, Laughlin S: Ion-Channel Noise Places Limits on the Miniaturization of the Brain’s Wiring. Current Biology. 2005, 15: 1143-1149. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.056.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rushton WAH: A theory of the effects of fibre size in medullated nerve. J Physiol. 1951, 115: 101-122.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen BL, Hall DH, Chklovskii DB: Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. PNAS. 2006, 103: 4723-4728. 10.1073/pnas.0506806103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Waxman SG, Bennett MVL: Relative Conduction Velocities of Small Myelinated and Non-myelinated Fibres in the Central Nervous System. Nature. 1972, 238: 217-219. 10.1038/238217a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Neishabouri and Faisal; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement