Volume 12 Supplement 1

Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open Access

How local is the local field potential?

  • Henrik Lindén1Email author,
  • Tom Tetzlaff1,
  • Tobias C Potjans2, 3,
  • Klas H Pettersen1,
  • Sonja Grün2, 4,
  • Markus Diesmann2, 3, 4 and
  • Gaute T Einevoll1
BMC Neuroscience201112(Suppl 1):O8

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-O8

Published: 18 July 2011

The local field potential (LFP), usually referring to the low-frequency part of an extracellularly recorded potential (< 500 Hz), is nowadays routinely measured together with the spiking activity. The LFP is commonly believed to mainly reflect synaptic activity in a local population surrounding the electrode [1] but how large this population is, i.e. how many neurons contribute to the signal, is still debated. In this modeling study we investigate which factors influence the spatial summation of contributions that generate the LFP signal. A better understanding of this is crucial for a correct interpretation of the LFP, especially when analyzing multiple LFP signals recorded simultaneously at different cortical sites.

We use a simplified two-dimensional model of a cortical population of neurons where the LFP is constructed as a weighted sum of signal contributions from all cells within a certain radial distance to the recording electrode. First we consider a general formulation of the model: if the single-cell LFP contributions can be viewed as current dipole sources [2], the single-cell amplitude will decay as 1/r2 with distance r to the electrode. On the other hand, for the two-dimensional geometry considered here, the number of neurons at a given distance increases linearly with r. In addition to these two opposed scaling factors the amplitude of the summed LFP signal also depends on how correlated the single-cell LFP sources are. We calculate the LFP amplitude as a function of the population radius and relate it to the above factors. We show that if the single-cell contributions decay as dipole sources or more steeply with distance, and if the sources are uncorrelated, the LFP is originating from a small local population. Cells outside of this population do not contribute to the LFP. If, however, the different LFP sources are uniformly correlated, cells at any distance contribute substantially to the LFP amplitude. In this case the LFP reach is only limited by the size of the region of correlated sources. This result highlights that the spatial region of the LFP is not fixed; rather it changes with the dynamics of the underlying synaptic activity.

We further validate these results through LFP simulations of morphologically reconstructed cortical cells [24] where we study the effects of neuronal morphology on the size of the region contributing to the LFP. Finally, we show the laminar dependence of the reach measure used here and discuss potential implications of the interpretation of experimentally recorded LFPs.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Research Council of Norway (eVita [eNEURO], NOTUR), EU Grant 15879 (FACETS), EU Grant 269921 (BrainScaleS), BMBF Grant 01GQ0420 to BCCN Freiburg, Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, Japan, and the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dept. of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences
(2)
Computational and Systems Neuroscience (INM-6), Research Center Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine
(3)
Brain and Neural Systems Team, RIKEN Computational Science Research Program
(4)
RIKEN Brain Science Institute

References

  1. Mitzdorf U: Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena. Physiol Rev. 1985, 65: 37-100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lindén H, Pettersen KH, Einevoll GT: Intrinsic dendritic filtering gives low-pass power spectra of local field potentials. J Comput Neurosci. 2010, 29: 423-444. 10.1007/s10827-010-0245-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Holt GR, Koch C: Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies. J Comput Neurosci. 1999, 6: 169-84. 10.1023/A:1008832702585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pettersen KH, Hagen E, Einevoll GT: Estimation of population firing rates and current source densities from laminar electrode recordings. J Comput Neurosci. 2008, 24: 291-313. 10.1007/s10827-007-0056-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lindén et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement