Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increases the therapeutic efficacy of bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in cerebral ischemia in mice
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 27 January 2011
Accepted: 24 June 2011
Published: 24 June 2011
Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMMC) transplantation is a promising therapy for cerebral ischemia; however, little is known if its therapeutic efficacy may be improved by co-administration of potential modulatory factors in vivo. To explore this possibility, the present study examined the effect of BMMCs and G-CSF on cell proliferation, early neuronal development and neurological function recovery in experimental cerebral ischemia relative to controls that received neither treatment.
Ischemia/infarct area was significantly reduced in BMMCs+G-CSF group relative to animal groups treated with BMMCs only, G-CSF only or saline. Transplanted BMMCs were found to colocalize with the proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and the immature neuronal marker doublecortin (DCX). The BMMCs+G-CSF group showed increased numerical density of cells expressing PCNA and DCX, improved performance in adhesive sticker removal test and reduced neurological function severity scores relative to other groups in a time-dependent manner.
BMMCs and G-CSF co-administration exhibits synergistic beneficial effect over time. This effect could be at least partially related to increased proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow stem cells and enhanced host brain regeneration and functional recovery. The results suggest that G-CSF can increase the therapeutic efficacy of BMMCs transplantation in an experimental mouse model of cerebral ischemia.
Bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMCs) are a population of pluripotent progenitor cells with potential therapeutic value to boost cell repair and regeneration in some disease conditions. In the context of neurology, BMMCs have been shown to promote neuronal regeneration in ischemic cerebrovascular diseases [1, 2]. BMMCs can be modulated by various cellular or hormonal factors, suggesting that their putative therapeutic efficacy might be enhanced via co-administration of these factors in vivo. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is one of such biological modulators, and has been shown to enhance proliferation and mobilization of BMMCs in some disease models . For instance, Jin et al  have demonstrated that G-CSF promotes the migration of bone marrow cells into injured mouse liver. We have previously shown that transplanted BMMCs may relocate to the cerebrum following ischemic injury . Accordingly, we hypothesize that G-CSF can promote BMMCs homing to ischemic cerebrum, and improve histological outcome and neurological function recovery. To explore these possibilities, BMMCs were isolated from the bone marrow of BALB/c mice, double labeled in vitro with the membrane fluorescent dye PKH26 and the nuclear fluorescence probe 4', 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). These pre-labeled BMMCs were transplanted into host mice received either G-CSF or vehicle following experimental cerebral ischemia. Therapeutic effects were evaluated by assessing infarct size, integration of transplanted BMMCs in the brain, recovery of neurological function.
Flow cytometric analysis of donor BMMCs
Surface antigen profile of donor BMMCs by flow cytometry
Effect of G-CSF and BMMCs on cerebral infarct size
Effect of G-CSF and BMMCs on PCNA expressing cells
One potential effect of G-CSF on BMMCs may involve the proliferative capability of these transplanted cells. We therefore assessed PKH26/DAPI cells co-expressing PCNA, a nuclear cell proliferation marker , by confocal fluorescent microscopy. PKH26, DAPI and PCNA triple-labeled cells were found largely around the border of the ischemic and healthy cortical areas (Figure 2A-E). In order to compare cell proliferative rate among the 4 animal groups, we semi-quantitatively assessed the abundance of PCNA labeled cells at day 1, 7, 14 and 28 after MCAO by immunohisochemistry using DAB as a chromogen (Figure 2F). The density of PCNA positive cells was significantly higher in the BMMCs+G-CSF group relative to other groups at the 4 surviving time points (Figure 2G). Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests indicated that at the 1 day surviving point a statistically significant difference existed between BMMCs+G-CSF group and the remaining 3 groups, but not between the BMMCs, G-CSF and saline groups. At other surviving points, there was statistically significant difference between the saline group and each of the treatment groups (the BMMCs+G-CSF, BMMCs or G-CSF group). In addition, the density of PCNA labeled cells was increased with time in the BMMCs+G-CSF (p < 0.001, F = 118.7), BMMCs (p < 0.001, F = 27.54) and G-CSF (p <0.001, F = 20.76) groups, but this change was not found in the saline group (p = 0.105, F = 2.55) (Figure 2G).
Effect of G-CSF and BMMCs on DCX expressing cells
Recent studies suggest that transplanted BMMCs may transdifferentiate into neurons in ischemic or traumatized brain [8, 9]. We have previously shown that PKH26 pre-labeled BMMCs may colocalize with doublecortin (DCX), a marker of immature neurons, in the ischemic host cerebrum . In the present study, we confirmed that PKH26/DAPI double-labeled BMMCs could be co-labeled for DCX in animals surviving 14 and 28 days (Figure 3A-E). In both immuofluorescent and DAB (Figure 3F) preparations, DCX positive cells occurred mostly around the infarct border.
We carried out densitometric analysis of DCX labeled cells (in DAB preparation) in the 4 groups of animals at day 1, 7, 14 and 28 post MCAO (Figure 3G). The density of DCX-labeled cells increased with surviving time in the BMMCs+G-CSF, BMMCs and G-CSF groups (p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA analysis), but not in the saline group (p = 0.1057). At the 7, 14 and 28 days surviving time points, the density of DCX+ cells in the BMMCs+G-CSF, BMMCs and G-CSF groups was higher relative to the saline group (p = 0.021 to p < 0.0001). Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests also showed statistically significant difference between the saline group and each of the other groups, and between the BMMCs+G-CSF group and the BMMCs or G-CSF group at 14 and 28 surviving days (Figure 3G).
Effect of G-CSF treatment on neurological function recovery
The neurological severity scores (NSS) were high but similar (p > 0.05) among the 4 animal groups as assessed at day 1 after MCAO (Figure 4B). During the recovery phase, the scores showed a trend of reduction with time in all groups. The BMMCs+G-CSF group exhibited significantly lower scores relative to the BMMCs only group as well as the two animal groups that did not receive the bone marrow cells at 7 to 28 days surviving points (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001, Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests). The time-dependent decline in neurological severity scores was confirmed by statistical analysis (p < 0.0001, F = 119.8, df = 3, 19, one-way ANOVA).
Transplanted BMMCs proliferate and transdifferentiate in ischemic cerebrum
Bone marrow stem cell therapy has merged as a promising treatment for acute brain trauma. In practice, donor bone marrow cells are a mix of cellular components, with the BMMC fraction being considered a key player in the beneficial therapeutic efficacy in neuronal recovery. Our fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis suggests a phenotype of the transplanted cells being hematopoietic stem cells in nature, based on their expression of CD34 (93. 5%), CD44 (45.8%), CD45 (80.9%) and Sca-1(1.9%) . The use of PKH26 and DAPI double fluorescent labeling allow us to trace the homing of BMMCs in the recipient mouse brain. Consistent with an early report , immunofluorescent co-labelings for PCNA and DCX suggest that some of these pre-labeled BMMCs are undergoing proliferation and appear to trans-differentiate into immature neurons in the ischemic cerebrum.
BMMCs and G-CSF exhibit synergistic effect on cell proliferation and early neuronal development in ischemic cerebrum
Improving the therapeutic efficacy of BMMC transplant may be of future clinical relevance. Data from the present study support that G-CSF, a biological regulator of BMMCs in vivo, may exhibit beneficial modulatory effect on both the transplanted bone marrow cells as well as the histological and neurological outcome in the host animals in an acute model of cerebral ischemia or infarction. Densitometric analyses show that the amount of PCNA and DCX-expressing cells are increased in the cerebral cortex in G-CSF-treated recipient mice relative to the BMMCs and G-CSF groups, in addition to the saline group. Therefore, it appears that BMMCs transplantation and G-CSF administration each could promote cell proliferation and DCX expression in the ischemic cortex , while BMMCs and G-CSF co-treatment elicits a synergistic effect. These findings suggest that BMMCs and G-CSF are both positive modulatory factor in the homing and potential neuronal trans-differentiation of hemopoietic stem cells in ischemic cerebral cortex.
BMMCs and G-CSF exhibit synergistic effect on histological and neurological outcomes
G-CSF administration appears to also reduce the cerebral infarct size according to our assessment on brain slices. In fact, this effect is most noticeable in animals received BMMC transplant as compared to ischemic animals without BMMC treatment. Thus, BMMC infusion and G-CSF treatment appear to exhibit synergeric protective effect in lesioned host animals. In parallel with the improved histological outcome, animals received G-CSF treatment show better neurological function recovery.
Mechanistic consideration for the effect of BMMCs and G-CSF in ischemic cerebrum
The precise mechanism by which G-CSF may influence transplanted and host BMMCs, or other cellular components, in the ischemic mouse brain remains to be elucidated. However, a large body of basic and clinical studies suggest that G-CSF can mobilize hemopoietic stem cells, therefore might improve their delivery and differentiation in bodily tissue [12–14]. It is known that G-CSF can promote cell proliferation including stem cell proliferation and their differentiation into neutrophils, eosinophils and mononuclear macrophages. This pro-proliferative or cell trophic effect is probably mediated by G-CSF receptor (G-CSF-R), which is especially enriched on the cell surface of bone marrow stem cells [15, 16]. G-CSF-R activation initiates signal transduction through proteins including Jak, Lyn, STAT and Erk1/2, which may cascade cell proliferation, differentiation and maturation [17, 18]. Via such a mode G-CSF may help transplanted or host blood stem cells home to the injured brain and potentiate neuronal regeneration [4, 19]. Of note, some authors suggest that G-CSF may facilitate the migration and localization of neuronal stem cells into injured areas . Therefore, G-CSF administration might also play a role in promoting intrinsic neuronal self-repair in the brain.
In summary, this work demonstrates that G-CSF administration facilitates the therapeutic efficacy of BMMC transplantation in histological and neurological outcomes in a mouse model of focal cerebral ischemia. Because autologous BMMC transplantation may be useful in the treatment of cerebral injury including ischemia, co-administration of G-CSF may be considered a promising adjunct therapy in clinical practice. Further basic and clinical investigations are warranted to explore the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of combined G-CSF administration and BMMCs transplantation in cerebral ischemia.
The present study shows that G-CSF may promote the homing, proliferation and potentially neuronal differentiation of transplanted BMMCs in ischemic mouse cerebral cortex. G-CSF administration also appears to improve the efficacy of BMMC transplantation by reducing cerebral infarct size and enhancing neurology function recovery. The data raise a possibility of using BMMC transplantation together with G-CSF administration in clinical treatment of cerebral ischemia.
Experimental animals and reagents
Primary antibodies and major biochemical reagents used in this study
Antibody or Biochemical Reagents
Mouse anti-PCNA antibody
Mouse anti-DCX antibody
Alexa Fluor® 488
FITC rat IgG 2α κIsotype
APC rat IgG 2α κIsotype ctrl
PE rat IgG 2b κIsotype ctrl
Percp rat IgG 2b κIsotype ctrl.
FITC anti-mouse LY-6A/EC Sca-1
APC anti-mouse CD34
PE anti-mouse/human CD44
Percp anti-mouse CD45
To evaluate the effect of G-CSF administration and BMMC transplantation, mice were divided into donor group (n = 14, for BMMC donation) and recipient group with focal cerebral ischemia. The recipient group was then sub-divided. Thus, Group #1 animals (BMMCs+G-CSF) received BMMCs transplantation combined with G-CSF injection (30 μg/kg/d, i.p.). Group #2 animals (BMMCs) received BMMCs without G-CSF injection. Group #3 animals (G-CSF) received G-CSF injection (30 μg/kg/d, i.p.) without BMMCs treatment. Group #4 was treated with 0.3 ml of saline (0.9% NaCl, i.p.) as vehicle control. For group #1, daily G-CSF injection (30 μg/kg/d, i.p.) started after BMMC transplantation and continued once a day for four successive weeks. The same G-CSF administration protocol was used for group #3 (S-Figure 1). Four animals per group were used for evaluation of infarct size and 4 animals per group were used for histology and immunohistochemistry.
Isolation, in vitro fluorescent labeling and transplantation of BMMCs
As shown previously, BMMCs can be isolated and labeled in vitro prior to transplantation [11, 21]. Briefly, the femoral bones were aseptically harvested from donor mice under anaesthesia (sodium pentobarbital, 100 mg/kg, i.p.). After resection, the bone marrow in the medullary cavity was bathed with saline containing heparin (50 U/ml). The bone marrow cells were harvested and suspended in lymphocyte isolation medium under sterile conditions. After dilution with 2 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.01 mol/L, pH = 7.4) at 1:1 ratio, cells were slowly added to yield a relative density of 1.077 g/cm3, which was followed by centrifugation at 2000 rpm for 20 minutes. The cells were harvested, washed with PBS three times, and centrifuged at 1200 rpm for 10 minutes. The second layer of cells in the centrifugation tube was removed and re-suspended with DMEM/F12 medium (DMEM/F12, 15% PBS, 100,000 U/L penicillin, pH = 7.4) to provide a cell density > 5 × 108 cells/L. Then BMMCs were pre-labeled by PKH26 and DAPI according to the manufacturer's instruction . The final density of double-labeled cell suspension was adjusted to 3 × 107 cells/ml. The viability of BMMCs was greater than 95% measured by trypan blue exclusion. For a given recipient mouse 1 × 107 double-labeled BMMCs were injected via the tail vein.
Identification of double-labeled cells by flow cytometric analysis
Putative BMMCs double labeled by PKH26 and DAPI (1 × 106 cells/ml) were incubated in 2% fetal bovine serum in PBS at 4°C for 20 minutes with 1 μl of mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for CD34, CD44, CD45, Sca-1 or treated with normal mouse serum as a control. Samples were then analyzed by FACS Calibur with CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, USA).
BALB/c mice model of focal cerebral ischemia
In order to establish the experimental murine model of focal cerebral ischemia, the middle cerebral artery was occluded with electric coagulation following a modified craniectomy . The surgical procedures have been described previously in detail [11, 21].
For adhesive removal tests, square-shaped pieces (100 mm2) of adhesive-backed paper were used as bilateral tactile stimuli by placing on the distal-radial area of the wrist of each forelimb. Mice were pre-trained for 1 week before tests and assessed basal level of time scores for adhesive removal before MCA occlusion. Mice were tested in 3 trials to measure the mean time to remove the adhesive papers, with a cutoff time of 300 seconds.
The neurological severity scores (NSS) were modified and calculated following the method of Lu D et al . The modified neurological severity scores (mNSS) are given according to animal's performance on motor (muscle status, abnormal movement), sensory (visual, tactile, and proprioceptive) and reflex tests [22, 23]. Points reflect the extent of inability to perform a given test; thus, higher scores represent poorer neurological function or presumably greater injury.
Mice were sacrificed and perfused transcardially for 2 minutes at 120 mmHg with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4, PBS) via a left ventricular stab under overdose pentobarbital anesthesia (sodium pentobarbital 100 mg/kg, i.p.). The brains were dissected out and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose at 4°C overnight, embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound, frozen, and prepared into 8-μm-thick frozen sections using a cryostat.
Histological and morphological evaluation of BMMC homing
To assess the rate of proliferation and survival of cells after BMMC transplantation, a one in eight series of sections from each brain was collected randomly to identify PKH26 and DAPI double positive cells. Additional sections were processed for immunolabeling of PCNA and DCX using microwave antigen retrieval as previously described [11, 21]. Briefly, sections (thaw-mounted on slides) were treated with 1% H2O2 in PBS for 30 minutes, and pre-incubated in 5% normal rabbit serum in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes. Sections were then incubated with PCNA (1:200) or DCX (1:100) antibody. Sections were further reacted with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse (PCNA) or goat (DCX) antibody at 1:400 concentration (BM0104 Boster company, Santa Cruz Biotechnology ) for 2 hours, and subsequently with the ABC reagent (1:400) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for another 1 hour. The immunoreactivity was then visualized by using DAB (0.05%) and H2O2 (0.003%). Slides were then dipped in hematoxylin, dehydrated and coverslippered.
For immunofluorescence, sections were incubated with PCNA or DCX antibody overnight, washed extensively and followed by a 2 hours reaction with Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugated donkey anti-mouse or anti-goat IgGs (1:200, A21206 Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Sections were then washed and mounted with anti-fading medium before examination on a laser confocal scanning microscope (LSM 510 META; Zeiss, Germany). Sections from every mouse in the recipient group were processed in parallel under identical conditions to minimize variations in staining intensity.
Data and statistical analyses
All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. One set of sections from each animal was selected randomly. In each frozen section, 10 microscopic fields were captured randomly at a magnification of 200X. All analyses were processed using the statistical software GraphPad Prism 4. Means were compared using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests. Statistical significance was set at a p value < 0.05.
We thank Dr. William Orr, Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Canada, for suggestions regarding the use of English in this manuscript.
- Keimpema E, Fokkens MR, Nagy Z: Early transient presence of implanted bone marrow stem cells reduces lesion size after cerebral ischaemia in adult rats. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009, 35: 89-102. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2008.00961.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang YC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Li H: Regenerative therapy for stroke. Cell Transplant. 2007, 16: 171-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kessinger A, Mann S, Murphy BO, Jackson JD, Sharp JG: Circulating factors may be responsible for murine strain-specific responses to mobilizing cytokines. Exp Hematol. 2001, 29: 775-8. 10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00642-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin SZ, Meng XW, Sun X: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Enhances Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Homing to the Liver in a Mouse Model of Acute Hepatic Injury. Dig Dis Sci. 2010, 55: 2805-13. 10.1007/s10620-009-1117-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang XM, Du F, Yang D, Yu CJ, Huang XN, Liu W, Fu J: Transplanted bone marrow stem cells relocate to infarct penumbra and co-express endogenous proliferative and immature neuronal markers in a mouse model of ischemic cerebral stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11: 138-10.1186/1471-2202-11-138.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okada S, Nakauchi H, Nagayoshi K, Nishikawa S, Miura Y, Suda T: In vivo and in vitro stem cell function of c-kit- and Sca-1-positive murine hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1992, 80: 3044-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maga G, Hubscher U: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): a dancer with many partners. J Cell Sci. 2003, 116: 3051-60. 10.1242/jcs.00653.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bischofberger J: Young and excitable: new neurons in memory networks. Nat Neurosci. 2007, 10: 273-5. 10.1038/nn0307-273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu WZ, Li X, Qi JP: Experimental study of cell migration and functional differentiation of transplanted neural stem cells co-labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide and BrdU in an ischemic rat model. Biomed Environ Sci. 2008, 21: 420-4. 10.1016/S0895-3988(08)60063-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M: Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 1229-34. 10.1038/81326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu D, Goussev A, Chen J: Atorvastatin reduces neurological deficit and increases synaptogenesis, angiogenesis, and neuronal survival in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004, 21: 21-32. 10.1089/089771504772695913.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakano-Doi A, Nakagomi T, Fujikawa M: Bone marrow mononuclear cells promote proliferation of endogenous neural stem cells through vascular niches after cerebral infarction. Stem Cells. 2010, 28: 1292-302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhdanov VV, Stavrova LA, Dygai AM, Goldberg ED: Mechanism of mobilization of mesenchymal stem cell under the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2007, 144: 151-3. 10.1007/s10517-007-0276-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buzzeo MP, Yang J, Casella G, Reddy V: Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization with G-CSF induces innate inflammation yet suppresses adaptive immune gene expression as revealed by microarray analysis. Exp Hematol. 2007, 35: 1456-65. 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.06.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beekman R, Touw IP: G-CSF and its receptor in myeloid malignancy. Blood. 2010, 115: 5131-6. 10.1182/blood-2010-01-234120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamada T, Honjo E, Maeda Y: Homodimeric cross-over structure of the human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) receptor signaling complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 3135-40. 10.1073/pnas.0511264103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Xue J, Zadorozny EV, Robinson LJ: G-CSF stimulates Jak2-dependent Gab2 phosphorylation leading to Erk1/2 activation and cell proliferation. Cell Signal. 2008, 20: 1890-9. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2008.06.018.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu LL, Liu YJ, Yang SG: Isolation and characterization of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells with hematopoiesis-supportive function and other potentials. Haematologica. 2006, 91: 1017-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dekker A, Bulley S, Beyene J, Dupuis LL, Doyle JJ, Sung L: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 5207-15. 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.1663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Six I, Gasan G, Mura E, Bordet R: Beneficial effect of pharmacological mobilization of bone marrow in experimental cerebral ischemia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 458: 327-8. 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02785-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang XM, Du F, Yang D, Yu CJ, Huang XN, Liu W, Fu J: Therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells for experimental cerebral ischemia in mice. Neural Regeneration Research. 2010, 5: 1765-1772.Google Scholar
- Lu D, Mahmood A, Wang L, Li Y, Lu M, Chopp M: Adult bone marrow stromal cells administered intravenously to rats after traumatic brain injury migrate into brain and improve neurological outcome. Neuroreport. 2001, 12: 559-63. 10.1097/00001756-200103050-00025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chauveau F, Moucharrafie S, Wiart M: In vivo MRI assessment of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion by electrocoagulation: pitfalls of procedure. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2010, 2: 4-10.1186/2040-7378-2-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.