Hyperbaric oxygen upregulates cochlear constitutive nitric oxide synthase
- Chia-Der Lin†1, 2,
- I-Hua Wei3,
- Chih-Ho Lai4,
- Te-Chun Hsia†5,
- Ming-Ching Kao6, 7,
- Ming-Hsui Tsai1, 2,
- Ching-Hsiang Wu3, 8 and
- Mang-Hung Tsai3Email author
© Lin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 1 September 2010
Accepted: 22 February 2011
Published: 22 February 2011
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a known adjuvant for treating ischemia-related inner ear diseases. Controversies still exist in the role of HBOT in cochlear diseases. Few studies to date have investigated the cellular changes that occur in inner ears after HBOT. Nitric oxide, which is synthesized by nitric oxide synthase (NOS), is an important signaling molecule in cochlear physiology and pathology. Here we investigated the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on eardrum morphology, cochlear function and expression of NOS isoforms in cochlear substructures after repetitive HBOT in guinea pigs.
Minor changes in the eardrum were observed after repetitive HBOT, which did not result in a significant hearing threshold shift by tone burst auditory brainstem responses. A differential effect of HBOT on the expression of NOS isoforms was identified. Upregulation of constitutive NOS (nNOS and eNOS) was found in the substructures of the cochlea after HBOT, but inducible NOS was not found in normal or HBOT animals, as shown by immunohistochemistry. There was no obvious DNA fragmentation present in this HBOT animal model.
The present evidence indicates that the customary HBOT protocol may increase constitutive NOS expression but such upregulation did not cause cell death in the treated cochlea. The cochlear morphology and auditory function are consequently not changed through the protocol.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an effective treatment for decompression Sickness (DCS) and arterial gas embolism (AGE), and is proposed as an adjunct in treating ischemia-related inner ear diseases [2–4], sudden deafness [4, 5], and acute noise trauma [6, 7]. The efficacy of HBOT in treating these inner ear diseases is variable, and the mechanism of HBOT in inner ears is still not fully understood. For example, HBOT has been proposed to be an effective rescue strategy for noise trauma [6, 7]; however, one study found that HBOT had an adverse effect on the inner ear after noise trauma . Consequently, a high degree of medical skepticism still exists regarding the role of HBOT in treating inner ear diseases. More studies on the functional and cellular changes that occur after HBOT may help to elucidate these conflicting results.
Nitric oxide (NO) has important roles in cochlear physiology, including neurotransmission , regulation of cochlear blood flow [10, 11], homeostasis of cochlear endolymph  and induction of cytotoxicity under pathological conditions [12, 13]. NO is synthesized by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) with the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline. Three isoforms of homologous NOS have been identified, including two constitutive isoforms (neuronal NOS [nNOS or NOS I] and endothelial NOS [eNOS or NOS III]) and one inducible isoform (iNOS or NOS II) [11, 14, 15]. Constitutive NOS is calcium/calmodulin dependent and is continuously expressed, whereas iNOS is calcium independent and is expressed in response to specific stimulants such as cytokines or endotoxins . Constitutive isoforms of NOS, both nNOS and eNOS, are expressed in the normal cochlea , but iNOS is expressed in the cochlea only after exposure to some pathologic conditions such as endotoxins , ischemia  or acoustic trauma . The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of repetitive HBOT on cochlear function and the expression of NOS isoforms by means of immunohistochemical staining.
No significant auditory changes after repetitive customary HBOT
Differential expression of NOS isoforms in different cochlear regions after repetitive HBOT
Immunohistochemistry using the antibody against eNOS in the control NBA group revealed moderate immunoreactivity in the stria vascularis, organ of Corti, limbus, spiral ganglion and modiolar blood vessels (Figure 3C). In the experimental HBOT group, enhanced immunoreactivity of eNOS was present in the spiral ganglion, modiolar blood vessels, limbus and stria vascularis (Figure 3D). Significantly enhanced eNOS immunoreactivity was noted in the modiolar blood vessels, nerve fibers and the limbus in the HBOT group (Figure 4B).
Immunohistochemistry using the antibody against iNOS did not reveal immunoreactivity in the NBA and HBOT groups, as compared with the iNOS expression in the positive control spleen tissue (Figures 3E, 3F and 3G).
To assess the co-expression of nNOS and eNOS in the cochlea after HBOT, we used confocal microscopy (Figure 5). Co-expression of nNOS and eNOS was noted in the spiral ganglion and stria vascularis. Single expression of eNOS immunoreactivity was also present in the capillaries within the spiral ganglion region (Figure 5). In the cochlear modiolus, nNOS was expressed in the modiolar nerve fibers, whereas eNOS was expressed along the modiolar blood vessels.
No obvious DNA fragmentation after HBOT by TUNEL assay
Our present study, which was designed according to the HBOT protocol used in clinical practice for acute cerebral ischemia , provides a functional measurement and immunohistochemical evidence of cochlear NOS changes as well as morphological evaluation of the eardrum after HBOT. HBOT effects on hearing may be caused by decompression illnesses or barotraumas to the middle or inner ear . A slight increase in hearing sensitivity is evident in animals receiving extreme acute hyperbaric conditions . The increased hearing sensitivity may be caused by changes in the tympanic membrane and middle ear impedance, which may be altered under hyperbaric conditions . In this study, the tympanic membrane and mesotympanum were observed by otoscopy after repetitive HBOT. No significant changes in tympanic membrane or mesotympanic injury were observed, with the exception of one ear with moderate hemotympanum (Figure 1). Because of their widely patent Eustachian tube, guinea pigs have been shown to tolerate compression well, with minimal middle/inner ear barotrauma even under rapid compression rates such as 2 ATA in 2 seconds . Any barotrauma due to repetitive HBOT might gradually improve without significant sequelae . Therefore, the hearing threshold was not significantly affected by the minor changes in the eardrum and middle ear (Figure 2).
Transient deterioration of cochlear function during the initial exposure to HBOT has been observed in guinea pigs and rabbits, which has been attributed to the vasoconstriction of cochlear blood vessels during the initial exposure to hyperbaric oxygen . Hyperbaric oxygen causes a slight morphologic alteration in the outer hair cells of newborn rats . After repetitive HBOT, minor changes in cochlear function were observed including cochlear degeneration, inner hair cell damage and hemorrhage in the perilymphatic space and scala media . The cochlear hemorrhage phenomenon after hyperbaric treatment was also reported in rats . The cochlear changes observed in these studies [25, 26] might be caused by higher-pressure conditions and a more-rapid compression-decompression process, since cochlear degeneration and hemorrhage were more pronounced under higher-pressure conditions (up to 5 ATA) . In that study, the rate of compression was >0.3 ATA/min, and decompression was about 0.5 ATA/min. These conditions exceed the standard HBOT protocols used in clinical practice. With slower compression-decompression procedures and more modest maximum compression pressures, no significant changes in hearing levels were observed after repetitive HBOT [22, 27]. In this study, a slower compression-decompression protocol (≤0.2 ATA/min) and lower peak pressure (2.5 ATA) more closely mimic the current HBOT protocol used in clinical practice. It is of note that no significant shifts in the hearing level or cell death by TUNEL assay were observed before and after HBOT using this animal model. We suggest the results of this study more accurately reflect the clinical effects of HBOT on the cochlea.
The elevation of the hydrostatic pressure while breathing oxygen during HBOT will increase the partial oxygen in target tissues providing the animal has a functioning cardiorespiratory system and the target tissue is perfused. After hyperbaric treatment at 2.5 ATA with pure oxygen, partial oxygen pressure in the cochlear perilymph may increase by up to 5-fold . By this mechanism, HBOT may be effective for sudden sensorineural hearing loss where ischemia may be the cause [4, 5]. This may also include noise-induced hearing loss [6, 7]. In addition to elevation of partial oxygen pressure, oxidative stress is believed to be fundamental to the therapeutic mechanisms for HBOT . Reactive nitrogen species, including NO, contribute to this stress . NO is synthesized by different NOS isoforms and the expression of these isoforms varies both from tissue to tissue and with the application of HBOT. We might therefore expect a range of effects from HBOT in different target tissues. The cerebrovascular responses to hyperoxia may be modulated by eNOS and nNOS-derived NO . Hyperbaric oxygen exposure may enhance sensitivity to seizure because of the early cerebral vasoconstriction by eNOS-derived NO . Repetitive HBO exposure may further elevate NO content in the brain, which may promote an imbalance between glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic function and the genesis of oxygen-induced seizures . In contrast, HBOT preconditioning may protect myocardium from subsequent ischemia/hypoxia by way of upregulating eNOS . Therefore, HBO may be beneficial or harmful depending on the type of tissue.
Different NOS isoforms are expressed in discrete regions of the cochlea. The constitutive NOS, nNOS and eNOS, are distributed in the substructures of the cochlea under normal physiologic conditions . nNOS immunoreactivity is found in the hair cells, spiral ganglion, stria vascularis, spiral ligaments, limbus and nerve fibers and spiral ganglion, whereas eNOS immunoreactivity is present in the endothelium of the cochlear microvascular trees, stria vascularis, limbus and the spiral ganglion [14, 16]. iNOS was not found in the structures of the normal cochlea . iNOS is expressed in the cochlea only after exposure to some pathologic condition such as endotoxin , ischemia  or acoustic trauma [16, 17]. In this study, the distribution of nNOS and eNOS was similar to that of previous studies [14, 16]. nNOS was distributed in the spiral ganglion, nerve fiber bundles, stria vascularis, limbus and hair cells. eNOS was distributed along the microvascular structures in the cochlea such as the endothelium of blood vessels in the modiolus, stria vascularis, spiral ganglion and limbus. After repetitive HBOT, constitutive NOS immunoreactivity was enhanced in these regions (Figure 3). Morphometric analysis depicted the significantly enhanced immunoreactivity of nNOS in nerve fiber bundles and that of eNOS in nerve fiber bundles, limbus and modiolar blood vessels (Figure 4). Marginally significant enhanced immunoreactivity was demonstrated in stria vascularis and spiral ganglion. Co-expression of eNOS and nNOS was also shown in stria vascularis and spiral ganglion after HBOT (Figure 5). These indicate that the possible therapeutic role of HBOT may be through the upregulation of constitutive NOS in the cochlear neurovascular substructures since mild elevation of NO may provide a neuroprotective effect on auditory hair cells under ischemic condition . We have 10 cochleae for each group in this study. Regarding the marginal significance in some effects such as spiral ganglion and stria vascularis, our study was underpowered to determine the statistical significance of such effect. For example, given the sample size and effect size we had in the current study, the power for the immunoreactivity (reflected as the optical densities, [OD]) of eNOS comparison between HBOT and NBA group for spiral ganglion was 0.47. Future studies will need to include larger numbers of animals in order to confirm or refute these marginal findings.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of the upregulation of constitutive NOS in some substructures of the cochlea after HBOT treatment. Constitutive NOS may act as a protective enzyme. In cerebrovascular tissue, hyperbaric oxygen can elicit a vasorelaxing effect from constitutively active NO by eNOS and nNOS , although eNOS-derived NO may have some vasoconstrictive effect during the early exposure to HBO . NOS produces NO, which induces relaxation of the smooth musculature and regulation of the vasotonia as a microbiotic messenger . Thus, the important role of NO in cardioprotection  and cerebroprotection  against ischemic damage is established. NO released from constitutive NOS such as eNOS also protects cochlear venules from excessive venular leakage . In contrast, iNOS usually has a devastating role in biological processes. Induction of iNOS has also been demonstrated in some cochlear pathologies like ischemia  or noise trauma . When the cochlea is exposed to hypoxic or ischemic conditions, the expressed iNOS may lead to an overexpression of peroxides , which subsequently induce a direct toxic effect on neurons and may affect the endocochlear potential. The synaptic complex between the hair cells and the nerve fibers is another region that the NO may exert its role . NO could inhibit the glutamate receptors by positive feedback under normoxic conditions. Conditions causing cochlear hypoxia such as acoustic overstimulation may induce glutamate release and calcium influx at the synaptic complex between the hair cells and the nerve fibers  and increase iNOS expression with excessive formation of NO . Upon glutamate release, overproduction of iNOS-derived NO can further increase the cochlear oxidative stress and cochlear dysfunction. In this study, only constitutive NOS, especially eNOS, was upregulated after HBOT, whereas iNOS was not immunoreactive. Thus, customary HBOT may play a therapeutic role rather than an adverse affect on cochlear pathology.
This study showed a differential effect of HBOT on the expression of NOS isoforms. Upregulation of constitutive NOS was shown in the substructure of the cochlea after HBOT, but iNOS was not expressed. Such observations should be extrapolated to the humans with caution, but support a therapeutic role for HBOT. There were no significant changes in the eardrums or ABR threshold shifts, and there was no obvious DNA fragmentation after HBOT in the guinea pig model.
Adult male albino guinea pigs (400-600 g, 10-14 weeks of age) with intact Preyer reflexes and normal eardrums were used in this study. Animals were housed in groups under diurnal lighting conditions, and regular guinea pig diet and water were provided ad libitum. Animal use protocols were approved by the China Medical University Committee on Use and Care of Animals (permission number: 96-75-N). The experimental HBOT group included five animals that received regular repetitive HBOT (see below). The control, normobaric air (NBA) group included five animals that did not receive HBOT and were maintained in normobaric room air.
Hyperbaric oxygen experiments were conducted in a balloon-bag acrylic chamber inside a large pressure chamber (Hyperbaric Oxygen Center in the China Medical University Hospital). The HBOT protocol used in the study was similar to the HBOT protocol used in clinical practice for acute cerebral ischemia . The temperature inside was maintained between 22 and 26°C with relative humidity at ~60%. The chamber pressure was steadily increased to a pressure of 2.5 atmosphere absolute (atm abs. or ATA). Compression and decompression were carried out at a rate of 0.2 ATA/min. Each treatment consisted of 17 min of compression time, 60 min of stable compression time at 2.5 ATA and 13 min of decompression time. The animals were continuously observed during the course of HBOT to manually adjust the oxygen ventilation rate and observe the behavior of the animals, particularly for signs of irritability or discomfort. A balloon that indicates the pressure balance between the inside and outside of the small chamber was mounted on the side wall of the small acrylic chamber. The animals in the experimental group received 20 HBOT treatments over a 4-week period (once per weekday, five times per week).
To minimize the frequency of anesthesia, visual assessment of the tympanic membrane was performed associated with the procedure for auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements (described below). After guinea pigs were anesthetized with intramuscular injection of zoletil (30 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), photographs of the tympanic membrane were obtained using a Storz tele-otoscope. The severity of barotrauma on the tympanic membrane was graded using a modified Teed classification scheme : 0, normal; 1, slight vascular injection or retraction of the eardrum; 2, mild hemorrhage in the eardrum; 3, gross hemorrhage in the eardrum; 4, hemotympanum; 5, tympanic membrane perforation.
Hearing tests were performed by tone burst ABR in a sound-attenuated room, before and after completion of the 20 HBOTs. The pure tone bursts were generated with the amplitude specified by a real-time programmable attenuator (Intelligent Hearing Systems, IHC Smart EP version 3.97, Miami, FL, USA) with ER2 insert earphone, with stimulus frequencies of 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz (0.2-ms rise/fall time and 1-ms flat segment) with maximal output levels of 125, 123, 111 and 117 dB sound pressure level (SPL). The tone bursts were produced by an IHS transducer (IHS Inc., Miami, FL, USA) in a closed acoustic system through the sound delivery system. Responses for 1024 sweeps were averaged at each intensity level around the threshold in 5-dB SPL steps. Threshold was defined as the lowest intensity level at which a clear waveform was visible in the evoked trace and was determined by visual inspection of the responses. At least two sequences of recordings were made at the threshold intensity to verify the reproducibility of the ABR responses. ABR threshold at each time and at each frequency was compared with the pre-surgical threshold as a baseline. Threshold shift values were estimated.
Animals were sacrificed after the 20 HBOT treatments. They were first anesthetized by intramuscular injection of zoletil (30 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) and then perfused intracardially with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) at pH 7.4. The temporal bones and spleen tissues of the animals were removed. The cochleae were opened at the apex and round window and oval window membranes for better penetration of the paraformaldehyde. The temporal bones were immersed in the same fixative overnight at 4°C. Decalcification was performed with 0.1 M EDTA solution, buffered with PBS to pH 7.4, for 4 weeks at 4°C. Serial sections (7 μm thick) were cut using a microtome in a plane parallel to the long axis of the cochlea and mounted on silane-coated slides for further immunohistochemical analysis. At least six sections obtained from the modiolus in each animal were immunostained. Serial sections (7 μm thick) of spleen tissue were also cut using a microtome and mounted on silane-coated slides for further immunohistochemical analysis to act as positive control for the expression of iNOS.
A standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase (ABC) method was used to locate NOS immunoreactive regions . In brief, the sections were rinsed with 0.05 M Tris-buffered solution (TBS) at pH 7.4 and then incubated in 3% H2O2 for 1 h, followed by 0.1% Triton X-100 in 10% serum (normal goat serum [NGS] for eNOS/iNOS and normal horse serum [NHS] for nNOS) for 1 h. Subsequently, samples were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies to nNOS (mouse monoclonal, 1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), eNOS (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or iNOS (rabbit polyclonal, 1:2000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The sections were then incubated with the secondary antibodies, either biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for eNOS and iNOS or anti-mouse IgG for nNOS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), diluted 1:200 in 2% serum (NGS for eNOS and iNOS and NHS for nNOS). The reaction was developed with a horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin complex (Dako A/S, Denmark) at a 1:300 dilution for 1 h, followed by 0.06% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma) with 0.066% H2O2 substrate medium in 0.05 M TBS. All specimens were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and embedded in a Clearmount mounting solution (Zymed, USA). Sections from each of the experimental animals were immunostained during the same run to allow comparisons across the groups. The spleen from each animal was subjected to the same fixation process, sectioned and immunostained to serve as the iNOS-positive control. Sections were photographed and analyzed using a Zeiss Axioskopz light microscope (Axioskop 2, Zeiss, Germany).
Semi-quantitative morphometric analysis
The intensities of nNOS and eNOS immunoreactivity were measured in the cochlea by comparing the optical densities (ODs) of the immunoreactivity in the control (normal room air, NBA) and experimental (hyperbaric oxygen treatment, HBOT) groups using the image analyzer (Image Pro Plus III, Media Cybernetics, USA) . Two comparative paramodiolar sections were sampled and analyzed from the apical to the basal turn of the cochleae from both ears of each animal. Twenty different cochlear sections were analyzed in each group, including 80 different regions of each Corti's organ. The total areas of the selected immunoreactive regions were calculated and compared between the control and experimental groups. The packing ODs of the target regions in each cochlea were calculated and compared based on the summation of ODs relative to the selected areas in each cochlear turn, from the apical to basal region.
Immunofluorescence labeling and confocal microscopy
To study the co-expression of nNOS and eNOS in the cochlear sections, immunofluorescence labeling of eNOS and nNOS was performed. The sections were rinsed with 0.05 M TBS at pH 7.4 and then incubated in 3% H2O2 for 1 h, followed by 0.1% Triton X-100/10% NGS in PBS for 1 h. Subsequently, they were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies to nNOS (1:100 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and eNOS (1:1000 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The sections were then incubated with the secondary antibodies, FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG for nNOS and rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG for eNOS (Sigma), diluted 1:200 by 2% NGS in PBS. Finally, the section slides were examined in a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM510, Zeiss).
In situ detection of nuclear DNA fragmentation
We used the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP)-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method to detect DNA fragmentation. The TUNEL assay was performed using an in situ cell death detection kit with a fluorescein label (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, USA). The kit contains TdT, which catalyzes the polymerization of fluorescein dUTP to free 3'-OH DNA ends in a template-independent manner. TUNEL-positive cells were identified by incorporation of fluorescein-conjugated dUTP. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the sections were pre-treated with permeabilization solution (0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate) for 2 min on ice (4°C) and then incubated for 60 min at 37°C with the TUNEL reaction mixture. After washing in PBS, sections were photographed in a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss). Brain tissue from guinea pigs that suffered penetrating trauma (under anesthesia) 3 days prior to sacrifice was used as a positive control .
All values from groups of animals were presented in box plots, which included medians, 25th percentile, 75th percentile, minimum and maximum. For the comparison between groups, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test contained in the SPSS program (version 12.0 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) was applied. The differences were considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.
auditory brainstem response
hyperbaric oxygen therapy
nitric oxide synthase
terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP)-biotin nick end labeling.
We thank Ms. Hui-Chuan Lin for technical assistance in preparation of the specimens. We are deeply appreciated to the statistic suggestions and assistances from Professor TC Li, Professor WM Liang and Ms YC Yeh in the China Medical University Biostatistics Center. This research was supported in part by Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (DOH100-TD-B-111-004) and by research grants from China Medical University (CMU97-069) and China Medical University Hospital (DMR99-46).
- Tibbles PM, Edelsberg JS: Hyperbaric-oxygen therapy. New Engl J Med. 1996, 334 (25): 1642-1648. 10.1056/NEJM199606203342506.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamm K, Lamm C, Arnold W: Effect of isobaric oxygen versus hyperbaric oxygen on the normal and noise-damaged hypoxic and ischemic guinea pig inner ear. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1998, 54: 59-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujimura T, Suzuki H, Shiomori T, Udaka T, Mori T: Hyperbaric oxygen and steroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007, 264 (8): 861-866. 10.1007/s00405-007-0272-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aslan I, Oysu C, Veyseller B, Baserer N: Does the addition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy to the conventional treatment modalities influence the outcome of sudden deafness?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002, 126 (2): 121-126. 10.1067/mhn.2002.121915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakashima T, Fukuta S, Yanagita N: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for sudden deafness. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 1998, 54: 100-109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuokkanen J, Virkkala J, Zhai S, Ylikoski J: Effect of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on permanent threshold shift in acoustic trauma among rats. Acta Otolaryngo. 1997, 529 (suppl): 80-82. 10.3109/00016489709124088.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ylikoski J, Mrena R, Makitie A, Kuokkanen J, Pirvola U, Savolainen S: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy seems to enhance recovery from acute acoustic trauma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2008, 128 (10): 1110-1115. 10.1080/00016480801901634.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cakir BO, Ercan I, Civelek S, Korpinar S, Toklu AS, Gedik O, Isik G, Sayin I, Turgut S: Negative effect of immediate hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute acoustic trauma. Otol Neurotol. 2006, 27 (4): 478-483. 10.1097/00129492-200606000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zdanski CJ, Prazma J, Petrusz P, Grossman G, Raynor E, Smith TL, Pillsbury HC: Nitric oxide synthase is an active enzyme in the spiral ganglion cells of the rat cochlea. Hear Res. 1994, 79 (1-2): 39-47. 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90125-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brechtelsbauer PB, Nuttall AL, Miller JM: Basal nitric oxide production in regulation of cochlear blood flow. Hear Res. 1994, 77 (1-2): 38-42. 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90251-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fessenden JD, Schacht J: Localization of soluble guanylate cyclase activity in the guinea pig cochlea suggests involvement in regulation of blood flow and supporting cell physiology. J Histochem Cytochem. 1997, 45 (10): 1401-1408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takumida M, Anniko M, Ropa P, Zhang DM: Lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the guinea pig organ of Corti. Hear Res. 2000, 140 (1-2): 91-98. 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00188-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morizane I, Hakuba N, Hyodo J, Shimizu Y, Fujita K, Yoshida T, Gyo K: Ischemic damage increases nitric oxide production via inducible nitric oxide synthase in the cochlea. Neurosci Lett. 2005, 391 (1-2): 62-67. 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.08.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franz P, Hauser-Kronberger C, Bock P, Quint C, Baumgartner WD: Localization of nitric oxide synthase I and III in the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 1996, 116 (5): 726-731. 10.3109/00016489609137914.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruan RS: Possible roles of nitric oxide in the physiology and pathophysiology of the mammalian cochlea. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 962: 260-274. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04073.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gosepath K, Gath I, Maurer J, Pollock JS, Amedee R, Forstermann U, Mann W: Characterization of nitric oxide synthase isoforms expressed in different structures of the guinea pig cochlea. Brain Res. 1997, 747 (1): 26-33. 10.1016/S0006-8993(96)01149-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi X, Nuttall AL: Upregulated iNOS and oxidative damage to the cochlear stria vascularis due to noise stress. Brain Res. 2003, 967 (1-2): 1-10. 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)04090-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rusyniak DE, Kirk MA, May JD, Kao LW, Brizendine EJ, Welch JL, Cordell WH, Alonso RJ: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in acute ischemic stroke: results of the Hyperbaric Oxygen in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial Pilot Study. Stroke. 2003, 34 (2): 571-574. 10.1161/01.STR.0000050644.48393.D0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klingmann C, Praetorius M, Baumann I, Plinkert PK: Barotrauma and decompression illness of the inner ear: 46 cases during treatment and follow-up. Otol Neurotol. 2007, 28 (4): 447-454. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318030d356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller HE: Cochlear Potentials at 11 Atmospheres. Laryngoscope. 1971, 81 (6): 979-988. 10.1288/00005537-197106000-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi S: Inner Ear Barotrauma. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ. 1985, 32 (1): 19-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beuerlein M, Nelson RN, Welling DB: Inner and middle ear hyperbaric oxygen-induced barotrauma. Laryngoscope. 1997, 107 (10): 1350-1356. 10.1097/00005537-199710000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Murata K, Takeda T, Iwai H: Cochlear Microphonics in Oxygen at High-Pressure. Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1974, 208 (2): 77-88. 10.1007/BF00453921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Picciotti PM, Agostino SE, Di NW, Scarano E: Scanning electron microscopy of cochlea in new-born rats exposed to hyperbaric oxygen: preliminary report. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005, 25 (5): 267-270.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zheng XY, Gong JH: Cochlear Degeneration in Guinea-Pigs After Repeated Hyperbaric Exposures. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1992, 63 (5): 360-363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levendag PC, Kuijpers W, Eggermont JJ, van den Broek P, Huibers H, Huygen PL: The inner ear and hyperbaric conditions. An electrophysiological and morphological study. Acta Otolaryngol. 1981, 382 (suppl): 1-110.Google Scholar
- Mendel LL, Knafelc ME, Cudahy EA: Hearing function in a hyperbaric environment. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2000, 27 (2): 91-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thom SR: Oxidative stress is fundamental to hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Appl Physiol. 2009, 106 (3): 988-995. 10.1152/japplphysiol.91004.2008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atochin DN, Demchenko IT, Astern J, Boso AE, Piantadosi CA, Huang PL: Contributions of endothelial and neuronal nitric oxide synthases to cerebrovascular responses to hyperoxia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003, 23 (10): 1219-1226. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000089601.87125.E4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Demchenko IT, Atochin DN, Boso AE, Astern J, Huang PL, Piantadosi CA: Oxygen seizure latency and peroxynitrite formation in mice lacking neuronal or endothelial nitric oxide synthases. Neurosci Lett. 2003, 344 (1): 53-56. 10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00432-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu WW, Li JS, Sun XJ, Liu K, Zhang JH, Xu WG, Tao HY: Repetitive hyperbaric oxygen exposures enhance sensitivity to convulsion by upregulation of eNOS and nNOS. Brain Res. 2008, 1201: 128-134. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cabigas BP, Su JD, Hutchins W, Shi Y, Schaefer RB, Recinos RF, Nilakantan V, Kindwall E, Niezgoda JA, Baker JE: Hyperoxic and hyperbaric-induced cardioprotection: Role of nitric oxide synthase 3. Cardiovasc Res. 2006, 72 (1): 143-151. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.06.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helms AK, Whelan HT, Torbey MT: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy of cerebral ischemia. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005, 20 (6): 417-426. 10.1159/000088979.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi X, Nuttall AL: The demonstration of nitric oxide in cochlear blood vessels in vivo and in vitro: the role of endothelial nitric oxide in venular permeability. Hear Res. 2002, 172 (1-2): 73-80. 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00513-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazurek B, Haupt H, Georgiewa P, Klapp BF, Reisshauer A: A model of peripherally developing hearing loss and tinnitus based on the role of hypoxia and ischemia. Med Hypotheses. 2006, 67 (4): 892-899. 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.03.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teed RW: Factors producing obstruction of the auditory tube in submarine personnel. US Naval Med Bull. 1944, 42: 293-306.Google Scholar
- Wei IH, Huang CC, Chang HM, Tseng CY, Tu HC, Wen CY, Shieh JY: Neuronal NADPH-d/NOS expression in the nodose ganglion of severe hypoxic rats with or without mild hypoxic preconditioning. J Chem Neuroanat. 2005, 29 (2): 149-156. 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2004.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tsai MH, Wei IH, Jiang-Shieh YF, Jou MJ, Ko MH, Chen HM, Wu CH: Expression of protein gene product 9.5, tyrosine hydroxylase and serotonin in the pineal gland of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Neurosci Res. 2008, 60 (3): 233-243. 10.1016/j.neures.2007.11.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lindh C, Wennersten A, Arnberg F, Holmin S, Mathiesen T: Differences in cell death between high and low energy brain injury in adult rats. Acta Neurochir. 2008, 150 (12): 1269-1275. 10.1007/s00701-008-0147-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.