Volume 11 Supplement 1

Nineteenth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2010

Open Access

KIR currents suppress neuronal spiking for unsynchronized distal synaptic inputs in striatal medium spiny neurons: a computational study

BMC Neuroscience201011(Suppl 1):P153

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-P153

Published: 20 July 2010

Dendritic active conductances are known to powerfully modulate the integration of subthreshold synaptic inputs and thereby, neuronal excitability in central neurons. A suitable candidate for this modulation in medium spiny (MS) neurons of nucleus accumbens (NAc) is the KIR currents. We predict that KIR currents may differentially affect the temporal integration of synchronized and unsynchronized inputs from distal and proximal synapses and consequent neuron spiking. In this study, using a 189-compartment computational model of the neuron, built using NEURON simulation platform and based on Wolf et al. (2005) [1], we investigate this issue.

Eighty co-localized NMDA-AMPA synapses were used to mimic physiological synaptic inputs which were distributed either distally or proximally. Randomness of the inputs was varied using an adjustable parameter called “noise fraction” whose value varied between 0 (synchronized) and 1 (completely random) [2]. The synapses were redistributed within each region for each value of noise fraction. 30 trials were done for every combination of noise fraction and synapse position, recording the number of spikes elicited in each trial.

In the presence of KIR, probability of spiking progressively decreased with randomness for distal synaptic inputs (0.2 for completely random inputs) whereas in all other cases the probability was almost 1 (probability = 0.94 for Proximal inputs (Control); Figure 1A). Furthermore, the average number of spikes was greater for proximal inputs (Figure 1B & C). In the presence of KIR, the number of spikes decreased with the randomness of the input (Figure 1B) while in its absence, the number of spikes first increased and then decreased (Figure 1C) with input randomness.

Thus, KIR currents appear to differentially affect the temporal integration of unsynchronized distal inputs in NAc MS neurons, reducing cell excitability in their presence. Since, synchronous inputs are likely to be of greater functional significance than asynchronous inputs, KIR conductance, which in turn is powerfully modulated by external factors such as dopamine, may play an important role in discriminating functionally relevant/ irrelevant events.
Figure 1

Effect of K IR on MS neuron spiking. (A) Presence of KIR progressively decreased spike probability with randomness for distal inputs (probability = 0.2 for fully random inputs), while, in their absence, probability was always 1. Proximal inputs, synchronized or unsynchronized, and synchronized distal inputs showed spike probability ~ = 1 irrespective of the presence or absence of KIR. (B) In presence of KIR, the number of spikes decreased with input randomness, while it first increased and then decreased, in their absence (C).

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay


  1. Wolf JA, Moyer JT, Lazarewicz MT, Contreras D, Benoit-Marand M, O’Donnel P, Finkel LH: NMDA/ AMPA ratio impacts state transitions and entrainment to oscillations in a computational model of the nucleus accumbens medium spiny projection neuron. , J Neurosci. 2005, 25: 9080-9095. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2220-05.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Migliore M, Messineo L, Ferrante M: Dendritic Ih selectively blocks temporal summation of unsychronized distal inputs in CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Comput Neuosci. 2004, 16: 5-13. 10.1023/B:JCNS.0000004837.81595.b0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© John and Manchanda; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.