Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Presynaptic action of neurotensin on dopamine release through inhibition of D2 receptor function

BMC Neuroscience volume 10, Article number: 96 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Neurotensin (NT) is known to act on dopamine (DA) neurons at the somatodendritic level to regulate cell firing and secondarily enhance DA release. In addition, anatomical and indirect physiological data suggest the presence of NT receptors at the terminal level. However, a clear demonstration of the mechanism of action of NT on dopaminergic axon terminals is lacking. We hypothesize that NT acts to increase DA release by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors. To test this hypothesis, we used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FCV) to monitor in real time the axonal release of DA in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc).

Results

DA release was evoked by single electrical pulses and pulse trains (10 Hz, 30 pulses). Under these two stimulation conditions, we evaluated the characteristics of DA D2 autoreceptors and the presynaptic action of NT in the NAcc shell and shell/core border region. The selective agonist of D2 autoreceptors, quinpirole (1 μM), inhibited DA overflow evoked by both single and train pulses. In sharp contrast, the selective D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride (5 μM), strongly enhanced DA release triggered by pulse trains, without any effect on DA release elicited by single pulses, thus confirming previous observations. We then determined the effect of NT (8–13) (100 nM) and found that although it failed to increase DA release evoked by single pulses, it strongly enhanced DA release evoked by pulse trains that lead to prolonged DA release and engage D2 autoreceptors. In addition, initial blockade of D2 autoreceptors by sulpiride considerably inhibited further facilitation of DA release generated by NT (8–13).

Conclusion

Taken together, these data suggest that NT enhances DA release principally by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors and not by more direct mechanisms such as facilitation of terminal calcium influx.

Background

Neurotensin (NT) is a peptide originally isolated from bovine hypothalamus [1]. It is found in the CNS and gastrointestinal tract. In the CNS, NT acts as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator and one of its better known actions is to modulate dopaminergic transmission within the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal pathways [2]. In addition, a number of studies suggest that NT may be implicated in the pathophysiology of CNS disorders including schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease and drug abuse [2–5].

Considerable efforts have been made to characterize how NT acts to enhance dopamine (DA) release. When applied to the ventral tegmental area (VTA), NT increases the firing rate of DA neurons and DA release in terminal fields of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and the prefrontal cortex[6–8]. Moreover, acute microinjection of NT into the VTA enhances motor activity and facilitates DA-dependent behaviors[5, 6, 8]. At a mechanistic level, recent work has established that somatodendritic NT receptors enhance the firing rate of DA neurons through a Ca2+-dependent mechanism [9].

At the terminal level, NT also acts to enhance DA release. First, anatomical evidence for a presynaptic localization of NT receptors has been provided [10–12]. Second, NT facilitates K+-evoked and electrically-evoked DA release in dorsal striatal slice preparations [13, 14] as well as in dorsal striatum in vivo [15]. These results support a presynaptic effect of NT on DA neuron axon terminals, but previous studies have not identified the mechanism involved or excluded an indirect mechanism of action. Recent work studying glutamate cotransmission in cultured DA neurons failed to provide support for a direct excitatory effect of NT on axon terminals [16]. In addition, a previous preliminary report failed to detect an enhancement of DA release evoked by single electrical pulses in NAcc slices [17]. Thus, the mechanism of action of NT on dopaminergic axon terminals remains unclear.

In the present study, we used fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (FCV) to better characterize the presynaptic action of NT in the NAcc. We find that although NT fails to increase DA release evoked by single pulses, it strongly enhances DA release evoked by pulse trains that lead to prolonged DA release and engage D2 autoreceptors. Our results suggest that NT acts to enhance DA release by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors.

Results

Time course of DA overflow evoked by single-pulses and train-pulses in the nucleus accumbens

Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was used to monitor DA release at high time resolution in the shell and core/shell border region of Sprague-Dawley rat NAcc slices. We recorded DA overflow following single-pulse (400 μA, 1 ms) and in response to train-pulse stimulations (30 pulses delivered at 10 Hz), a frequency that can occur during bursting in vivo (Fig. 1A). The released substance was identified as DA since the oxidation currents recorded corresponded to the peak oxidation potential for DA (~+600 mV) (Fig. 1B). With train stimulation, DA concentrations peaked at 1.13 ± 0.18 μM (n = 5). DA concentrations rose to a maximum within ~400 ms (n = 5). The return to baseline was reached approximately 6 seconds after the peak signal and the signal width at half-height was ~2.2 s (n = 5). With single-pulse stimulation, DA levels reached a peak at 0.48 ± 0.09 μM (n = 5). DA concentrations rose to their maximum within ~200 ms (n = 5). The return to baseline was observed approximately one second after the peak and the signal width at half-height was ~0.4 s (n = 5). A significant difference was detected between the two stimulation conditions for the peak DA levels reached (Student's t-test, t = 5.07, p < 0.001). As expected, the release of DA evoked by electrical stimulation of the NAcc was blocked by TTX (1 μM) (15.3 ± 8.2% of control, n = 3) and was thus action potential-dependent, as well as by the removal of extracellular calcium (17.2 ± 11.0% of control, n = 6, with 0.5 mM Ca2+; and 10.5 ± 6.4% of control values, n = 2, with 0 mM Ca2+) (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
figure 1

Time course of evoked DA overflow in the nucleus accumbens. A) Average evoked DA overflow following single-pulse (400 μA, 1 ms/pulse, n = 5) and train-pulse (400 μA, 0.1 ms/pulse, 30 pulses at 10 Hz, n = 5) stimulations. B) Sample cyclic voltammogram. The voltammogram was obtained at the peak of evoked DA overflow under control conditions. The positions of the oxidation and reduction peaks are compatible with the fact that the species detected was DA.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure 2

Dependence of DA overflow on cell firing and extracellular calcium concentrations. Graph comparing the time course of DA overflow following train-pulse stimulations under control conditions (2.4 mM calcium) (n = 5) or in the presence of 1 μM TTX (n = 3), 0.5 mM calcium (n = 6) or 0 mM calcium (n = 2).

Full size image

NT facilitates DA overflow evoked by train-pulses but not by single-pulses

We next evaluated the effect of NT on electrically-evoked DA overflow in the NAcc. Using single electrical pulses, we found that at a saturating concentration [9], NT (8–13) (100 nM) failed to alter DA overflow (94.4 ± 5.5% of control; Student's t-test, t = 0.23, p > 0.05, n = 5), suggesting that DA release is not directly facilitated by NT (Fig. 3A, B). In sharp contrast, using train-pulse stimulation, NT significantly enhanced peak DA overflow to 143.1 ± 6.8% of control (Student's t-test, t = 3.98, p = 0.001, n = 13) (Fig. 3A, C). The facilitatory effect started to decline before the end of the period of agonist application: DA concentrations recorded after 8 min of NT application were lower than after 6 min (one-way ANOVA performed on time, T = 0 to T = 36, followed by post hoc Tukey tests, F = 13.81, p < 0.001). This observation is compatible with the known ability of type 1 NT receptors (NTR1) to desensitize in response to sustained stimulation [18]. In accordance with this, the preferential NTR1 antagonist SR42948 (1 μM) completely prevented the facilitatory effect of NT (peak overflow 100.8 ± 5.7% of control; t = 0.376 p > 0.05, n = 5) (results not shown).

Figure 3
figure 3

Neurotensin facilitates train pulse- but not single pulse-evoked DA overflow in the NAcc. A) Graphs representing the average amplitude and kinetics of single-pulse (lower traces) and train-pulse (upper traces) evoked DA overflow in the presence of NT (8–13) (100 nM) compared to control. B) Time course of peak DA overflow evoked by single electrical pulses. NT (8–13) (100 nM) was applied for a total of 8 min. It exerted no effect on single pulse-evoked DA overflow (n = 5). C) Time course of peak DA overflow evoked by train pulses. NT (8–13) strongly enhanced train-evoked DA overflow (n = 13). Data are expressed as a percentage of the DA levels recorded during the control period before NT.

Full size image

NT enhances DA release through inhibition of D2 autoreceptor function

Previous work has suggested that NT may decrease terminal D2 receptor function [16, 19–21]. One interpretation of the ability of NT to facilitate train-evoked but not single pulse-evoked DA overflow is therefore that NT acts principally by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors. This would imply that contrarily to train stimulation, D2 autoreceptors are usually not activated in response to single pulse stimulation, as was previously demonstrated [22–25]. To evaluate this hypothesis under our conditions, we next quantified evoked DA overflow using selective agonists and antagonists of the D2 autoreceptor. The D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (1 μM) decreased pulse train-evoked DA overflow to 27.9 ± 2.5% of control (Student's t-test, t = 12.33, p < 0.001, n = 3) (Fig. 4A, B) and single pulse-evoked DA overflow to 19.8 ± 8.7% of control (Student's t-test, t = 10.24, p < 0.001, n = 4) (Fig. 4C). In contrast, the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (5 μM) enhanced DA release triggered by pulse trains (175.3 ± 4.1% of control; Student's t-test, t = 14.4, p < 0.001, n = 8) (Fig. 4A, B), but had no effect on DA overflow evoked in response to single pulses (87.3 ± 1.7% of control values, Student's t-test, t = 1.40, p > 0.05, n = 4) (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4
figure 4

Activation of D 2 autoreceptors during train pulse- but not single pulse-evoked DA overflow. A) The graphs represent the average amplitude and kinetics of train-evoked DA overflow in the presence of 5 μM sulpiride (left) or 1 μM quinpirole (right). B) Graph showing the effect of the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (1 μM; n = 3), and the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (5 μM; n = 8) on DA overflow following pulse-train stimulation. Activation of D2 receptors by quinpirole inhibits peak DA overflow, whereas the blockade of these receptors by sulpiride considerably enhances it. C) Graph comparing the effect of quinpirole (1 μM; n = 5), and sulpiride (5 μM; n = 4) on DA overflow evoked by single-pulse stimulation. Under these conditions, D2 receptor activation also inhibits DA overflow, but D2 receptor blockade has no effect.

Full size image

We next tested whether NT still increased DA overflow following D2 receptor blockade. We first applied sulpiride (5 μM) alone and found that it increased DA levels to 181.5 ± 3.1% of control values (n = 10) (Fig. 5A). With sulpiride present in the bath, NT (8–13) (100 nM) produced only a minor additional increase in DA levels (to 194.1 ± 4.6% of the control level, n = 10), thus reflecting an almost complete block of the facilitating effect of NT (Fig. 5A, B). A one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests revealed a significant difference between control and these two conditions (sulpiride and sulpiride + NT) (F = 3.57, p < 0.05). A specific comparison of the enhancement of DA overflow by NT in the presence of sulpiride (12.7 ± 4.3% above sulpiride alone) or in its absence (43.1 ± 6.8% above control) shows that the effect of NT was strongly decreased under autoreceptor blockade (Student's t-test, t = 3.51, p = 0.002). These results suggest that the majority of the facilitatory effect of NT on DA release is mediated through inhibition of D2 autoreceptor function.

Figure 5
figure 5

NT enhances train-pulse evoked DA overflow through inhibition of D 2 autoreceptor function. A) Sulpiride (5 μM) alone was first pre-applied. With sulpiride present in the bath, NT (8–13) (100 nM) was introduced for a total of 8 min. The graphs represent the average amplitude and kinetics of train pulse-evoked DA overflow recorded during the control period (left), in the presence of sulpiride alone (middle) and in the presence of both NT (8–13) + sulpiride (right) (n = 10). Sulpiride alone enhanced peak DA overflow by 81% compared to control. In the presence of sulpiride, NT (8–13) only caused a small additional increase in DA levels (by 13% compared to the sulpiride alone condition) (n = 10). B) Summary graph showing the time course of the effect of NT (8–13) on peak DA overflow evoked by train-pulse stimulation following D2 receptor blockade by sulpiride (n = 10).

Full size image

Releasable pools of DA are not depleted in the presence of sulpiride

Pulse trains generate considerable DA release in the NAcc brain slice in the presence of sulpiride (maximal increase of 2.2 μM in the presence of both sulpiride and NT). The blockade by sulpiride of the ability of NT to facilitate DA release could thus in principle be an artefact resulting from a ceiling effect due to depletion of the releasable pools of DA or to the inability to further increase release probability. To test this possibility, we pre-applied sulpiride (5 μM) and then introduced a modified aCSF containing an elevated concentration of calcium (3.4 mM Ca2+). Sulpiride first increased DA overflow to 173.6 ± 6.9% of control levels (n = 7) (Fig. 6A). Elevation of extracellular Ca2+ to 3.4 mM in the presence of sulpiride produced an additional increased to 258.1 ± 15.1% of control (n = 7) (Fig. 6A, B). A one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey test confirmed significant differences between the control, sulpiride and 3.4 mM Ca2+ conditions (F = 5.57, p < 0.001). The maximal DA release detected with sulpiride and elevated Ca2+ exceeded 3.0 μM. Thus, the blockade by sulpiride of the ability of NT to facilitate DA release is not likely to simply result from a depletion of releasable pools of DA or to an inability to further increase release probability.

Figure 6
figure 6

Releasable pools of DA are not depleted in the presence of sulpiride. A) The graphs represent the average amplitude and kinetics of train pulse-evoked DA levels measured in the presence of sulpiride (5 μM) alone (+74% above control, n = 7) or sulpiride in the presence of an elevated concentration of extracellular Ca2+ (3.4 mM) (+ 84% above sulpiride alone, n = 7). B) Summary graph showing the time course of the effect of an elevation of extracellular Ca2+ to 3.4 mM (for a total of 8 min) with pre-applied sulpiride (5 μM) in the bath (n = 7).

Full size image

Discussion

Although multiple aspects of the action of NT at the cell body level in the VTA have been investigated [26–28], the mechanism of action of NT on dopaminergic axon terminals is still unclear. The present results provide new insight into the mechanism mediating the facilitation of DA release by NT at the level of axon terminals in the NAcc. We show that this mechanism implicates a decrease by NT of the effectiveness of terminal D2 autoreceptors that normally inhibit DA release. We also demonstrate that the effects of NT on DA release differ greatly depending on the electrical stimulation parameters used to elicit this release. On the one hand, NT fails to alter DA overflow triggered by single pulses in the NAcc. On the other hand, NT strongly enhances DA release evoked by pulse trains that generate prolonged DA release and strongly engage D2 autoreceptors.

An indirect mechanism can be discounted

NT is known to facilitate K+ and electrically-evoked DA release in dorsal striatal slice preparations [13, 14] as well as in vivo [15]. Although these observations imply a presynaptic effect of NT on dopaminergic axon terminals, previous results have not excluded an indirect mechanism of action. For example, NT could act through receptors located in the striatum on other elements than dopaminergic axon terminals. These receptors could for instance be located on corticostriatal glutamatergic axon terminals. If this were the case, NT could facilitate the spontaneous release of glutamate, which would then enhance DA release by depolarizing dopaminergic axon terminals. Although we cannot formally exclude this possibility or other possible indirect mechanisms, a major role for glutamate in mediating the ability of NT to enhance train-evoked DA overflow is not easily reconcilable with our observation that this facilitatory effect of NT is blocked in the presence of the D2 antagonist sulpiride. However, we cannot exclude a possible partial implication of postsynaptic D2 receptors located on NAcc medium spiny neurons, through some retrograde signaling mechanism.

Action of NT on axon terminals

Previous experiments have explored the characteristics of DA D2 autoreceptors under different stimulation conditions varying the pulse/train duration or interpulse intervals, but didn't directly address the issue of the control of DA release by NT at the terminal level [22–25]. Nonetheless, a previous preliminary report showed that NT fails to enhance DA release evoked by single electrical pulses in NAcc slices [17], and suggested that DA release is not directly facilitated by NT. This previous report is consistent with our observation of an apparent lack of effect of NT on DA overflow evoked by single pulses. Although this finding could be taken as arguing against a role of terminal NT receptors in regulating DA release, our findings using train pulse-evoked release shed light on this paradox by showing that NT acts instead to enhance DA release by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors. Our results support a recent report in which the authors monitored glutamate co-release in cultured DA neurons and found that NT does not directly increase glutamate release, but rather attenuates the function of presynaptic D2 receptors that otherwise inhibit glutamate release [16].

Two of our present findings argue in favor of the hypothesis that NT mainly acts to enhance DA release by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors. First, we show that only pulse train-evoked DA overflow is facilitated by NT. This observation is compatible with previous reports showing that a minimum of 150–300 milliseconds is required for D2 autoreceptor activation to inhibit DA release, conditions that are satisfied during train stimulation, but are not optimal to inhibit release induced by single short pulses [22–25]. In our experiments, the lack of facilitation by sulpiride of single-pulse evoked DA overflow is in favor of this interpretation. Second, we demonstrate that the facilitating effect of NT on pulse train-evoked DA overflow is almost completely prevented by pre-blockade of D2 receptors. An alternate interpretation of this later finding is that in the presence of sulpiride, the releasable pools of DA become depleted during stimulus trains or the release probability cannot be further increased, thus masking any subsequent facilitating effect of NT. Considering our observation that elevating extracellular Ca2+ strongly enhances DA overflow after pre-application of sulpiride, this hypothesis of a ceiling effect is unlikely. Nonetheless, we cannot completely exclude that releasable pools of DA are modified in elevated extracellular Ca2+. Alternate explanations of the ability of D2 receptor blockade to prevent the facilitating effect of NT on DA release thus cannot completely be discounted.

Together, our results thus suggest that in the NAcc, NT acts mainly by inhibiting the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors, leaving room for only a minor contribution of an additional mechanism. Although this second mechanism is presently unidentified, the capacity of NT receptors to mobilize intracellular Ca2+ in DA neurons [9] leaves opens the possible implication of a Ca2+-dependent priming of synaptic vesicles. Although we have not directly examined the dorsal striatum in the present experiments, our results are compatible with previous biochemical and in vivo microdialysis work also suggesting that NT acts to inhibit the function of terminal D2 autoreceptors in the dorsal striatum [19–21, 29].

In the present study, we found that the preferential NTR1 antagonist SR48692 prevented the facilitatory effect of NT on train-evoked DA overflow. Although we cannot exclude a partial contribution of the type 2 NT receptor (NTR2), our finding is compatible with previous data showing that DA neurons of the VTA and substantia nigra express abundant levels of NTR1 [30, 31], but only modest amounts of NTR2 [32]. Second, the excitatory effects of NT on DA neurons are maintained in NTR2 knockout mice but strongly decreased in NTR1 knockout mice [33]. Compatible with this, SR48692 has been shown to block the ability of NT to increase the firing rate of DA neurons in culture [9]. Finally, SR48692 blocks the ability of NT to reduce the effect of the D2 agonist pergolide on extracellular DA levels in the striatum in microdialysis experiments [29].

Conclusion

In summary, our results provide a better understanding of the mechanism of action of NT on dopaminergic axon terminals. We suggest that NT through its type 1 receptor enhances DA release mainly by inhibiting the function of D2-type autoreceptors, thus disinhibiting DA release. Future experiments should be oriented toward identifying the specific mechanism involved, such as heterologous desensitization of the D2 autoreceptor by NTR1 or direct receptor-receptor interactions.

Methods

Animals and slice preparation

Experiments were performed in accordance with the Université de Montréal animal ethics committee guidelines. Sprague Dawley rats, aged 4 to 6 weeks, were lightly anaesthetized with halothane and decapitated. Their brains were rapidly removed and transferred into ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing: 125.2 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 0.3 mM anhydrous KH2PO4, 2.4 mM anhydrous CaCl2, 1.3 mM anhydrous MgSO4 and 10 mM D-glucose. NAcc brain slices were then cut on a VT 1000s vibratome (Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany) at a thickness of 400 μm. The brain slices were separated into right and left sections at the mid-sagittal line after transfer to a holding chamber. Slices were allowed to recover for 1 hour at room temperature in the holding chamber in oxygenated (95% O2, 5% CO2) aCSF and then transferred to a custom-built recording chamber and perfused (1 ml/min) with aCSF at 35°C. For experiments performed in the absence of extracellular calcium, the composition of the zero calcium saline was NaCl 140 mM, KCl 5 mM, MgCl2 4 mM, EGTA 1 mM, Hepes 10 mM, Sucrose 4 mM, Glucose 10 mM.

Electrochemical recordings

Freshly-cut, disk carbon fibre electrodes of 5 μm diameter were fabricated according to procedures described by Kawagoe et al. [34] and by Kuhr and Wightman [35]. Electrodes were backfilled with a 4.0 M potassium acetate solution. The background current ranged from 50 to 180 nA. Fast-scan cyclic voltammetry was used to monitor DA release [36]. A triangular voltage waveform (-400 to +1000 mV at a rate of 300 V/s) was applied to the electrode every 100 ms and was computer-controlled using Clampex 9 software and a Digidata 1200B analog to digital converter (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). This voltage ramp was applied to the electrode via an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) in voltage-clamp mode. The background-subtracted voltammograms were used to identify the released substance. Prior work has also established that the primary catecholamine released in the rat NAcc slice is DA [37]. Calibration was performed in vitro for each working electrode before and after the experiment in a 1 μM DA solution, quantifying the peak of the oxidation current after adding DA.

Electrical stimulation

Single-pulse or train-pulse electrical stimulations were generated by an S-900 stimulator (Dagan, Minneapolis, MN) and computer-triggered. Stimulations were applied to the NAcc brain slice through a twisted bipolar tungsten stimulation electrode (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA). The 2 stimulating electrode tips were separated by 100 to 150 μm and were gently placed on the surface of the NAcc brain slice using a micromanipulator (Newport, Fountain Valley, CA). Single-pulse (1 ms) and train-pulse (10 Hz, 30 pulses, 0.1 ms/pulse) stimuli were then generated to evoke DA release. Pulse amplitude was 400 μA for both single and train pulses.

Experimental design

The recording chamber was connected to a temperature-controlled perfusion and aspiration system. The carbon fibre electrode was then inserted ~75 μm into the slice by a piezoelectric micromanipulator (Burleigh Instruments, Victor, NY) and placed at approximately 100 μm in front of the central position of the stimulating electrode tips. After insertion of the carbon fibre electrode, the slice was allowed to recuperate for at least 5 minutes before starting recordings. Electrical stimulations were applied at intervals of 2 minutes. The first 10 minutes served as a control period. The peak of each response was measured and plotted over time.

Drugs and chemicals

Chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) except for tetrodotoxin (TTX) (Alomone laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel). The 8–13 fragment of NT was used as a NT receptor agonist. It was used at a concentration of 100 nM, shown to produce maximal effects in previous studies [9]. The D2 receptor agonist quinpirole was used at a saturating concentration of 1 μM, while the antagonist sulpiride was used at a saturating dose of 5 μM, since numerous previous physiological studies use these ligands in the micromolar dose range [38–40]. Most drugs were stored in aliquots at -20°C as stock solutions and dissolved into aCSF immediately before use. Calcium, magnesium and glucose were freshly added to the aCSF, which was pre-oxygenated before use.

Statistical analysis

Data are provided as mean ± SEM, with n representing the number of slices. Simple two group comparisons were performed using Student's t-test. Multiple group means were compared by analyses of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Tukey post hoc test. The minimal significance level for tests was set at p < 0.05. Graphs are expressed in percentage of control, where the control for each slice represents the average of [DA] recorded in normal saline before the entrance of the drug (T = 0 to T = 8). The response after a drug application was then analysed by comparing the maximal effect of the drug with the corresponding time of the control graph.

Abbreviations

NT:

neurotensin

DA:

dopamine

FCV:

fast-scan cyclic voltammetry

VTA:

ventral tegmental area

NAcc:

nucleus accumbens

aCSF:

artificial cerebrospinal fluid

TTX:

tetrodotoxin

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

NTR1:

type 1 neurotensin receptor.

References

  1. Carraway R, Leeman SE: The isolation of a new hypotensive peptide, neurotensin, from bovine hypothalami. J Biol Chem. 1973, 248: 6854-6861.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rostene W, Brouard A, Dana C, Masuo Y, Agid F, Vial M, Lhiaubet AM, Pelaprat D: Interaction between neurotensin and dopamine in the brain. Morphofunctional and clinical evidence. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992, 668: 217-31. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb27352.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garver DL, Bissette G, Yao JK, Nemeroff CB: Relation of CSF neurotensin concentrations to symptoms and drug response of psychotic patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1991, 148: 484-488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. St-Gelais F, Jomphe C, Trudeau LE: The role of neurotensin in central nervous system pathophysiology: what is the evidence?. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006, 31: 229-45.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rompre P, Perron S: Evidence for a role of endogenous neurotensin in the initiation of amphetamine sensitization. Neuropharmacology. 2000, 39: 1880-1892. 10.1016/S0028-3908(99)00269-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalivas PW, Duffy P: Effect of acute and daily neurotensin and enkephalin treatments on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci. 1990, 10: 2940-2949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi WX, Bunney BS: Neurotensin modulates autoreceptor mediated dopamine effects on midbrain dopamine cell activity. Brain Res. 1991, 543: 315-321. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90043-U.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sotty F, Brun P, Leonetti M, Steinberg R, Soubrie P, Renaud B, Suaud-Chagny MF: Comparative effects of neurotensin, neurotensin(8–13) and [D-Tyr(11)]neurotensin applied into the ventral tegmental area on extracellular dopamine in the rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Neuroscience. 2000, 98: 485-492. 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)90023-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. St-Gelais F, Legault M, Bourque MJ, Rompre PP, Trudeau LE: Role of calcium in neurotensin-evoked enhancement in firing in mesencephalic dopamine neurons. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 2566-74. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5376-03.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quirion R, Chiueh CC, Everist HD, Pert A: Comparative localization of neurotensin receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic terminals. Brain Res. 1985, 327: 385-389. 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91542-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dilts RP, Kalivas PW: Autoradiographic localization of mu-opioid and neurotensin receptors within the mesolimbic dopamine system. Brain Res. 1989, 488: 311-27. 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90723-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schotte A, Leysen JE: Autoradiographic evidence for the localization of high affinity neurotensin binding sites on dopaminergic nerve terminals in the nigrostriatal and mesolimbic pathways in rat brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 1989, 2: 253-257.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Faggin BM, Cubeddu LX: Rapid desensitization of dopamine release induced by neurotensin and neurotensin fragments. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990, 253: 812-818.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heaulme M, Leyris R, Le Fur G, Soubrie P: Involvement of potentially distinct neurotensin receptors in neurotensin-induced stimulation of striatal [3H]dopamine release evoked by KCl versus electrical depolarization. Neuropharmacology. 1997, 36: 1447-1454. 10.1016/S0028-3908(97)00131-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferraro L, O'Connor WT, Antonelli T, Fuxe K, Tanganelli S: Differential effects of intrastriatal neurotensin(1–13) and neurotensin(8–13) on striatal dopamine and pallidal GABA release. A dual-probe microdialysis study in the awake rat. Eur J Neurosci. 1997, 9: 1838-1846. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1997.tb00750.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Legault M, Congar P, Michel FJ, Trudeau LE: Presynaptic action of neurotensin on cultured ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurones. Neuroscience. 2002, 111: 177-87. 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00614-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bull DR, Sheehan MJ: Presynaptic regulation of electrically evoked dopamine overflow in nucleus accumbens: a pharmacological study using fast cyclic voltammetry in vitro. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1991, 343: 260-265. 10.1007/BF00251124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Faure MP, Nouel D, Beaudet A: Axonal and dendritic transport of internalized neurotensin in rat mesostriatal dopaminergic neurons. Neuroscience. 1995, 68: 519-529. 10.1016/0306-4522(95)00145-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanganelli S, von Euler G, Fuxe K, Agnati LF, Ungerstedt U: Neurotensin counteracts apomorphine-induced inhibition of dopamine release as studied by microdialysis in rat neostriatum. Brain Res. 1989, 502: 319-324. 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90627-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. von Euler G, van dPI, Fredholm BB, Fuxe K: Neurotensin decreases the affinity of dopamine D2 agonist binding by a G protein-independent mechanism. J Neurochem. 1991, 56: 178-183. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb02578.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fuxe K, O'Connor WT, Antonelli T, Osborne PG, Tanganelli S, Agnati LF, Ungerstedt U: Evidence for a substrate of neuronal plasticity based on pre- and postsynaptic neurotensin-dopamine receptor interactions in the neostriatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 5591-5595. 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5591.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cragg SJ, Greenfield SA: Differential autoreceptor control of somatodendritic and axon terminal dopamine release in substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and striatum. J Neurosci. 1997, 17: 5738-5746.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips PE, Hancock PJ, Stamford JA: Time window of autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of limbic and striatal dopamine release. Synapse. 2002, 44: 15-22. 10.1002/syn.10049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Benoit-Marand M, Borrelli E, Gonon F: Inhibition of dopamine release via presynaptic D2 receptors: time course and functional characteristics in vivo. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 9134-41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmitz Y, Schmauss C, Sulzer D: Altered dopamine release and uptake kinetics in mice lacking D2 receptors. J Neurosci. 2002, 22: 8002-9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seutin V, Massotte L, Dresse A: Electrophysiological effects of neurotensin on dopaminergic neurones of the ventral tegmental area of the rat in vitro. Neuropharmacology. 1989, 28: 949-954. 10.1016/0028-3908(89)90194-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang ZG, Pessia M, North RA: Neurotensin excitation of rat ventral tegmental neurones. J Physiol (Lond). 1994, 474: 119-129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Werkman TR, Kruse CG, Nievelstein H, Long SK, Wadman WJ: Neurotensin attenuates the quinpirole-induced inhibition of the firing rate of dopamine neurons in the rat substantia nigra pars compacta and the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience. 2000, 95: 417-423. 10.1016/S0306-4522(99)00449-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Diaz-Cabiale Z, Fuxe K, Narvaez JA, Finetti S, Antonelli T, Tanganelli S, Ferraro L: Neurotensin-induced modulation of dopamine D2 receptors and their function in rat striatum: counteraction by a NTR1-like receptor antagonist. Neuroreport. 2002, 13: 763-6. 10.1097/00001756-200205070-00006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Szigethy E, Beaudet A: Correspondence between high affinity 125I-neurotensin binding sites and dopaminergic neurons in the rat substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area: a combined radioautographic and immunohistochemical light microscopic study. J Comp Neurol. 1989, 279: 128-137. 10.1002/cne.902790111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sato M, Kiyama H, Tohyama M: Different postnatal development of cells expressing mRNA encoding neurotensin receptor. Neuroscience. 1992, 48: 137-49. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90344-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarret P, Perron A, Stroh T, Beaudet A: Immunohistochemical distribution of NTS2 neurotensin receptors in the rat central nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 2003, 461: 520-38. 10.1002/cne.10718.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leonetti M, Brun P, Clerget M, Steinberg R, Soubrie P, Renaud B, Suaud-Chagny MF: Specific involvement of neurotensin type 1 receptor in the neurotensin-mediated in vivo dopamine efflux using knock-out mice. J Neurochem. 2004, 89: 1-6. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02231.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kawagoe KT, Zimmerman JB, Wightman RM: Principles of voltammetry and microelectrode surface states. J Neurosci Methods. 1993, 48: 225-40. 10.1016/0165-0270(93)90094-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuhr WG, Wightman RM: Real-time measurement of dopamine release in rat brain. Brain Res. 1986, 381: 168-71. 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90707-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Armstrong-James M, Millar J: Carbon fibre microelectrodes. J Neurosci Methods. 1979, 1: 279-87. 10.1016/0165-0270(79)90039-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wieczorek WJ, Kruk ZL: Differential action of (+)-amphetamine on electrically evoked dopamine overflow in rat brain slices containing corpus striatum and nucleus accumbens. Br J Pharmacol. 1994, 111: 829-836.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Patel J, Mooslehner KA, Chan PM, Emson PC, Stamford JA: Presynaptic control of striatal dopamine neurotransmission in adult vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) mutant mice. J Neurochem. 2003, 85: 898-910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Avshalumov MV, Rice ME: Activation of ATP-sensitive K+ (K(ATP)) channels by H2O2 underlies glutamate-dependent inhibition of striatal dopamine release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 11729-34. 10.1073/pnas.1834314100.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schmitz Y, Lee CJ, Schmauss C, Gonon F, Sulzer D: Amphetamine distorts stimulation-dependent dopamine overflow: effects on D2 autoreceptors, transporters, and synaptic vesicle stores. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 5916-24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants (MOP-49591) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) to L.-É. Trudeau and by an infrastructure grant from the FRSQ to the Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central. L.-É. Trudeau is supported by a senior scholar award from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ). Charbel Simon Fawaz received support from the CIHR, delivered by way of the Summer Scholarship Program of the Université de Montréal. Damiana Leo was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade of Canada. We wish to thank Marie-Josée Bourque for her help with drug preparation and animal maintenance, Shouwei Yang for his helpful suggestions for preparing brain slices and Drs. Pierre-Paul Rompré and Laurent Descarries for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Groupe de Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Central, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada

    Charbel S Fawaz, Philippe Martel, Damiana Leo & Louis-Eric Trudeau

Authors
  1. Charbel S Fawaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Martel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Damiana Leo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Louis-Eric Trudeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis-Eric Trudeau.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

CSF and PM and DL carried out the cyclic voltammetry experiments, performed data analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. LET conceived of the study and was responsible for the coordination of the project and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fawaz, C.S., Martel, P., Leo, D. et al. Presynaptic action of neurotensin on dopamine release through inhibition of D2 receptor function. BMC Neurosci 10, 96 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-96

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-96

Keywords

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us