Interaction of Cupidin/Homer2 with two actin cytoskeletal regulators, Cdc42 small GTPase and Drebrin, in dendritic spines
© Shiraishi-Yamaguchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 20 May 2008
Accepted: 24 March 2009
Published: 24 March 2009
Homer is a postsynaptic scaffold protein that links various synaptic signaling proteins, including the type I metabotropic glutamate receptor subunits 1α and 5, the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, Shank and Cdc42 small GTPase. Overexpression of Homer induces changes in dendritic spine morphology in cultured hippocampal neurons. However, the molecular basis underpinning Homer-mediated spine morphogenesis remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the structural and functional properties of the interaction between Cupidin/Homer2 and two actin-cytoskeletal regulators, Cdc42 small GTPase and Drebrin.
Cupidin/Homer2 interacted with activated Cdc42 small GTPase via the Cdc42-binding domain that resides around amino acid residues 191–283, within the C-terminal coiled-coil domain. We generated a Cupidin deletion mutant lacking amino acids 191–230 (CPDΔ191–230), which showed decrease Cdc42-binding ability but maintained self-multimerization ability. Cupidin suppressed Cdc42-induced filopodia-like protrusion formation in HeLa cells, whereas CPDΔ191–230 failed to do so. In cultured hippocampal neurons, Cupidin was targeted to dendritic spines, whereas CPDΔ191–230 was distributed in dendritic shafts as well as spines. Overexpression of CPDΔ191–230 decreased the number of synapses and reduced the amplitudes of miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents in hippocampal neurons. Cupidin interacted with a dendritic spine F-actin-binding protein, Drebrin, which possesses two Homer ligand motifs, via the N-terminal EVH-1 domain. CPDΔ191–230 overexpression decreased Drebrin clustering in the dendritic spines of hippocampal neurons.
These results indicate that Cupidin/Homer2 interacts with the dendritic spine actin regulators Cdc42 and Drebrin via its C-terminal and N-terminal domains, respectively, and that it may be involved in spine morphology and synaptic properties.
Homer is a scaffold protein that is targeted to the postsynaptic density (PSD) of excitatory synapses. There are three distinct members, Homer1, Homer2 and Homer3, in this protein family [1–6] (for review see ). Postsynaptic Homer scaffolds interact with a variety of PPxxF (Pro-Pro-x-x-Phe) ligand motif-containing signaling molecules, including the type I metabotropic glutamate receptor subunits 1α and 5 (mGluR1α/5), the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (InsP3R) and Shank, via its N-terminal Ena/VASP homology 1 (EVH1) domain [1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9], and forms a tetramer by self-assembly via its C-terminal coiled-coil (CC) and Leu zipper (LZ) motifs [4, 8, 10]. In cerebellar Purkinje cells, the interaction of Homer3 with mGluR1α is regulated by activity-dependent phosphorylation at the linker region between the EVH1 domain and the coiled-coil domain . In hippocampal neurons, Homer proteins co-cluster with the NMDA receptor complex during dendritic and synaptic differentiation , and regulate spine morphogenesis  as well as the functional organization of mGluR1α/5-InsP3R Ca2+ signaling in dendritic spines .
Dendritic spine morphology is dynamically changed in response to synaptic activity, which is associated with synaptic functions including the long-term maintenance of synaptic strengthening [15, 16]. Impaired spine morphology is known to contribute to mental retardations [15, 16]. We previously showed that Cupidin, identical to Homer2, is co-sedimented with filamentous actin (F-actin) via the EVH1 domain, and also interacts with the GTP-bound, activated form of Cdc42 small GTPase via the C-terminal region . Interestingly, over-expression of Cupidin/Homer2 suppressed Cdc42-induced formation of filopodia-like protrusions in HeLa cells . Moreover, Cupidin/Homer2 was partly colocalized with Drebrin, a dendritic F-actin-binding protein, in the dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons  and cerebellar granule cells . It is known that both Cdc42 [18–20] and Drebrin [21, 22] are involved in dendritic spine morphogenesis by regulating actin-cytoskeletal organization. A previous study showed that over-expression of Homer1b together with Shank induced enlargement of the spine heads of hippocampal neurons . Together, the results of these studies suggest that Homer family proteins are involved in the regulation and/or plasticity of spine morphology by interacting with two dendritic F-actin regulators, Cdc42 and Drebrin. However, little is known about the molecular basis underpinning the involvement of Homer proteins in actin cytoskeleton-based regulation of spine morphology.
In this study we analyzed the structural and functional properties of the Cupidin/Homer2 scaffolding that interacts with two dendritic spine F-actin organization modulators, Cdc42 and Drebrin. We defined the Cdc42-binding domain in the C-terminal region of Cupidin/Homer2 and revealed the functional significance of Cdc42-binding domain in spine and synapse formation by cultured hippocampal neurons, as well as in Cdc42-induced filopodia-like protrusion formation in HeLa cells. We also proved Drebrin to be a Homer EVH1-binding target and showed the effect of Cdc42-binding domain on the Drebrin accumulation in spines. These results strongly implicate the postsynaptic Homer scaffolding in the morphogenesis of dendritic spines.
Cupidin interacts with activated Cdc42 via the C-terminal coiled-coil region
Serial deletions starting every 40 aa from amino acid position 111 of CPD C (CPDΔ111–343, 151–343, 191–343, 231–343 and 284–343) showed that the first four deletion mutants, but not the shortest mutant CPD 284–343, retained Cdc42 binding activity (Fig. 1A). Because CPD 191–343 showed high radioactivity and CPD 231–343 showed low radioactivity, we made three further deletion mutants in the region aa 191–343 (CPD 191–230, CPD 191–283 and CPD 231–283) (Fig. 1B). As a result, CPD 191–283 showed high radiolabeling, but neither CPD 191–230 nor CPD 231–283 showed significant labeling, suggesting that the region between amino acids 191 and 283 is necessary for Cdc42 binding. We further N-terminally and C-terminally deleted the region 191–283 to generate 10 deletion mutants and obtained radiolabeling from only the parental CPD 191–283, but not from any of the mutants, indicating that the Cdc42-binding domain resides in the region 191–283 (Fig. 1C). The region 191–283 contains a part of the upstream Leu zipper motif LZA. Thus, we generated three internal deletion constructs: CPDΔ191–283 (deletion of aa 191–283) and CPDΔ231–283 (deletion of aa 231–283) lacked LZA but contained the downstream Leu zipper motif LZB, while CPDΔ191–230 (deletion of aa 191–230) harbored both LZA and LZB (Fig. 1D). CPDΔ191–230 showed radiolabeling that tended to be lower than that of CPD 191–283, whereas CPDΔ191–283 and CPDΔ231–283 showed no significant radiolabeling.
The Cupidin-Cdc42 interaction influences actin-cytoskeletal organization and the morphology of HeLa cells
The Cdc42-binding domain of Cupidin is involved in the formation of dendritic spines and synapses in hippocampal neurons
Overexpression of Cupidin induced mushroom-type spines in hippocampal neurons as shown in Fig. 4C. On the other hand, overexpression of GFP-CPDΔ191–230 decreased the number of mushroom-type spines and increased filopodia-like or odd-shaped protrusions, although the total number of dendritic protrusions was only slightly reduced in neurons expressing GFP-CPDΔ191–230 compared with neurons expressing GFP-CPD and GFP alone (Fig. 4C). These results are consistent with the idea that Cdc42-binding domain of Cupidin is important for spine morphogenesis and/or maturation.
The Cupidin-Cdc42 domain is involved in Drebrin targeting into dendritic spines
Endogenous Cupidin and Drebrin were both punctately distributed in dendritic spines of immunostained primary hippocampal neurons (Fig. 6C). Cupidin puncta (which are known to concentrate in the PSD [6, 12]) largely overlapped with Drebrin puncta (which are known to concentrate throughout spine heads ) around the bottom half of spine heads. We next analyzed the effects of GFP, GFP-CPD, or GFP- CPDΔ191–230 overexpression on the dendritic distribution of Drebrin in primary hippocampal neurons (Fig. 6D and 6E). The number of Drebrin puncta was slightly reduced by overexpressing Cupidin, but was significantly reduced by overexpressing GFP-CPDΔ191–230 (Fig. 6D and 6E). Taken together, these results suggested that a deletion in the Cdc42-binding region of Cupidin disturbs dendritic Drebrin distribution in hippocampal neurons.
We defined the Cdc42-binding domain (CBD) as the 96 amino acid residues in positions 191–283 within the C-terminal CC region. Among Homer family members, there are fragmentary sequence similarities (15 identical amino acids and 15 functionally similar amino acids) in the CBD region (Additional file 1). Homer interacts with Ophn-1 GAP , whereas Shank interacts with βPIX GEF , as described above. Thus, Homer-Shank scaffolds linking these GAP and GEF activities may synergistically regulate the activation (GTP-bound state) and inactivation (GDP-bound state) of Cdc42, which is involved in actin cytoskeleton regulation via the N-WASP, IRSp53-WAVE or PAK signaling pathways , resulting in fine regulation of spine morphology.
The N-terminal EVH1 domain of Homer recognizes the Homer ligand motif PPxxF [27–30]. Homer-binding target proteins identified thus far have only one PPxxF motif, except that TRPC1 (a transient receptor potential cation channel member) has two Homer binding sites, referred to as type 1 (PPxxF or PxxF) and atypical type 2 (LPSSP) . Intriguingly, mouse, rat and human Drebrin proteins (splice variants Drebrin A and Drebrin E) possess two conserved type 1 Homer ligand motifs (ligand-1: PP ATF and ligand-2: PP PVF) in the C-terminal region (Additional file 2). However, the truncated variant s-Drebrin has no motif. These lines of evidence suggest that the Cupidin/Homer2-Drebrin interaction is regulated by expression of these various forms. Chick and Xenopus Drebrin have only Homer ligand-1, although their motif sequence (PP ATF) is identical to that of mouse, rat and human. An association of decreased levels of Drebrin with deterioration of spines and synapses was reported in the hippocampal synapses [32, 33] and brains [32, 33] of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) as well as in Aβ peptide-treated hippocampal neurons . Thus, the interaction between Cupidin/Homer2 and Drebrin may be associated with the changes in spine morphology found in individuals with AD.
Cupidin/Homer2 interacts with activated Cdc42 via the Cdc42-binding domain within the C-terminal coiled-coil domain, which may play a role in the suppression of Cdc42-induced filopodia-like protrusion formation in HeLa cells and the formation of mushroom-type spines in hippocampal neurons. Cupidin/Homer2 interacts with a dendritic spine F-actin-binding protein Drebrin via the N-terminal EVH-1 domain. Drebrin possesses two Homer ligand motifs in the C-terminal region, and is mostly colocalized with Cupidin around the spine heads. Drebrin clustering in dendritic spines is disturbed by overexpression of Cupidin deficient in Cdc42 binding. These results suggest that Cupidin/Homer2 is involved in the modulation of spine morphology and function by scaffolding multiple target proteins, including the two dendritic spine actin regulators Cdc42 small GTPase and Drebrin.
Construction and expression of GST fusion proteins in E. coli
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion constructs were generated by cloning various parts of Cupidinα/Homer2a cDNA  into the GST fusion vector pGEX-KG (see, Fig. 1). Escherichia coli JM109 expressing GST-fusion proteins were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 25% sucrose, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM MgCl2). GST fusion protein lysates (10 mg) were coupled to glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) by rotating for 1 h at 4°C. After washing three times with 1% Triton X-100/phosphate-buffered saline, GST fusion protein-coupled Sepharose was mixed with 1 mg of protein lysates prepared from mouse cerebella, which were pre-cleared with glutathione-Sepharose for 1 h at 4°C. After rotating for 1 h at 4°C, the GST fusion protein complex was washed five times with cell lysis buffer and subjected to immunoblotting.
Ligand overlay assay with Cdc42
Bacterially expressed GST-Cdc42 protein was purified using glutathione-Sepharose column chromatography according to a previously described procedure . One μg samples of non-degraded GST-fusion proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). A ligand overlay assay was carried out as described previously . Briefly, after the GST-fusion proteins on the blots were re-natured, the protein blots were probed by incubating with each GST-Rho family fusion protein loaded with [35S]-GTPγS at an equal specific activity. After washing three times, the ligand-bound blots were air-dried and the radioactivities were analyzed using a BAS2000 Bioimaging analyzer (Fujix, Japan). The relative radioactivities were respectively measured from consistently sized areas using IPLab software (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA), and normalized as described in the figure legends (Fig. 1).
Western blot analysis
After boiling proteins in sample buffer (0.4 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 40% (v/v) glycerol, 0.04% bromophenol blue) for 5 min, equal portions of protein solution were separated by SDS-PAGE and electro-transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane filters (GE Healthcare). Blots were reacted with diluted primary antibodies: anti-Cupidin antibody (1:5000) , anti-pan Homer antibody (1:1000) , anti-Drebrin antibody (1:400) (D029-3, MBL), anti-Flag monoclonal antibody (1:1000) (F3165, Sigma), anti-GFP antibody (1:400) (11814460001, Roche), anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (1:1000) (sc-40, Santa Cruz). Immunoreactivity was detected with ECL (GE Healthcare).
Bacterially expressed GST-CPD, GST-CPD N, GST-CPD C, GST-CPDΔ191–230, GST-CPDΔ191–283, and GST-CPDΔ231–283 proteins were digested with thrombin to remove the GST moiety, and dialyzed against a crosslinking buffer (10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Tween 20, 5 mM DTT, and 1 mM GDP). Each GST- protein (25 μg/ml) was incubated with 10 mM dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 1 hr at room temperature. Equal amounts of DMP-treated protein mixtures were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-CPD antibody.
For examination of the effects of Cdc42 binding on Cupidin multimerization, COS7 cells were triple-transfected with Flag-tagged CPD, GFP-tagged CPD and either myc-tagged Cdc42V12 or myc-tagged Cdc42N17. Similarly, COS7 cells were triple-transfected with Flag-tagged CPDΔ191–230, GFP-tagged CPDΔ191–230, and either myc-tagged Cdc42V12 or myc-tagged Cdc42N17. To prepare protein extracts from these transfected cells, cells were lysed and homogenized in 1% Triton X-100 buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After centrifuging at 14,000 × g for 10 min, protein solutions (containing approximately 1 mg proteins) were mixed with anti-Flag antibody, and incubated for 1 h on ice. Protein-antibody complex was precipitated with protein G-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) followed by repeated centrifugation at 2000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The precipitated proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-CPD antibody. Signal intensities in areas of consistent size were measured using IPLab software, and the efficiency of multimerization was calculated as described in Fig. 2.
For examination of the Cupidin-Drebrin interaction, mouse cerebella (ICR, Nihon SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan) were lysed and homogenized in 1% Triton X-100 buffer (50 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After centrifuging at 14,000 × g for 10 min, protein solutions (containing approximately 1 mg proteins) were mixed with primary antibody (non-immune serum, anti-CPD C antibody, or anti-pan Homer antibody), and incubated for 1 h on ice. Protein-antibody complex was precipitated with protein G-Sepharose (GE Healthcare) followed by repeated centrifugation at 2000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The precipitated proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-Drebrin antibody.
Cell morphology of transfected HeLa cells
HeLa cells were transfected with CPD alone, CPDΔ191–230 alone, Cdc42V12 alone, Cdc42V12 and CPD, or Cdc42V12 and CPDΔ191–230 using the calcium phosphate precipitation method described previously . At 24 hours after transfection, cells were fixed with 4% formalin in PBS and stained with Alexa Fluor568-conjugated phalloidin (1:1000) (A12380, Invitrogen). Fluorescence was observed with a microscope (Eclipse E800; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a CCD camera (SPOT; Diagnostics Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, MI). The phalloidin images were captured following confirmation of completing single/double transfection by detection of distinct fluoroprobes, as described by Shiraishi et., al . The number of spikes protruding from the cellular edge were counted in 10 cells respectively, and represented as the means ± SE per 10 μm of cell edge; data were compared by a two-tailed unpaired Student t tests using Excel software (Microsoft Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Preparation of primary hippocampal cell cultures
Hippocampal primary cell cultures were prepared from embryonic day 17 Wistar rats (Nippon SLC, Shizuoka, Japan) as described previously . Briefly, hippocampi were dissected after rats had been anesthetized with diethyl ether; excised hippocampi were treated with 45 U of papain (Worthington, PAPL, Lakewood, NJ), 0.01% DNase I (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN), 0.02% DL-cysteine, 0.02% bovine serum albumin, and 0.5% glucose in PBS for 20 min at 37°C. After adding 20% bovine serum, cells were dissociated by repeatedly passing them through a 1-mL plastic pipette tip. Dispersed cells were plated at a density of 1.1 × 104 cells/cm2 onto poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips (Matsunami, Tokyo, Japan) in neurobasal medium (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) containing 2% B27 supplement (Invitrogen), 500 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin (Meiji, Tokyo, Japan), and 100 U/mL penicillin (Banyu, Tokyo, Japan). Cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37°C.
Construction of and infection with recombinant adenovirus vectors
The EGFP-coding region (referred as to GFP in this study) derived from pEGFP-C1 (Clontech, Cambridge, UK) was fused in frame to the N-terminus of the full-length or mutated constructs of Cupidin to generate GFP-CPD. The GFP fragment was also fused to Cupidin with a deletion of amino acid residues 191–230 (CPDΔ191–230) to generate GFP-CPDΔ191–230. Replication-deficient adenovirus vectors carrying these GFP-fused constructs were generated by the COS-TPC method, as described previously . Briefly, the DNA fragment of GFP-CPD or GFP-CPDΔ191–230 was inserted into the Swa I site of the pAxCAwt cosmid cassette (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). The resultant cosmid DNA was co-transfected with the complex of the Eco T22I-digested Ad5-dlx DNA and the terminal protein into HEK293 cells, and recombinant adenoviruses were thus obtained by homologous recombination between them. The viruses were propagated in HEK293 cells, and were concentrated and purified by double CsCl step gradient centrifugation. The titers of viruses were measured by the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) method. Hippocampal cultures at 19 days in vitro (DIV) were infected with the viruses at a multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) of 100–200, and were analyzed at post-infection 2 days, corresponding to 21 DIV.
Analysis of spine morphology
Hippocampal cultures were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min and directly incubated with Oregon Green phalloidin (Molecular Probes, 1:200) overnight at 4°C. DiI (Molecular Probes) emulsion, mixed with cod liver oil at 1 μg/μl, was put onto the somata of neurons, which were identified by phalloidin staining, as a droplet of 20–30 μm in diameter, using a manually handled injector (Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). After incubation overnight at 4°C, the excess un-penetrated DiI emulsions were removed by suction, and DiI images were captured by confocal microscopy (MRC1024; BioRad, Hercules, CA) with 100×, 1.4 NA lens. Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). Numbers of either GFP-CPD or GFP-CPD puncta were manually counted on the secondary dendrites of 10 neurons and the results presented as the means ± SE; data were compared by a two-tailed unpaired Student t test using Excel software. Spine morphology was categorized into five types as described in the legend for Fig. 4. Over 1,000 protrusions on the secondary dendrites of 20–30 neurons were analyzed for evaluation of spine morphology.
All immunocytochemical procedures were performed as described previously . Briefly, primary-cultured neurons (21 DIV) overexpressing GFP-constructs by adenovirus-mediated infection were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 37°C, washed three times with PBS, and then permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min. After preincubation with 5% BSA in PBS for 1 h, cells were incubated with primary antibody (anti-synaptophysin or anti-Drebrin antibody) for 1 h at 37°C. After washing three times with PBS, the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen). Fluorescence and phase-contrast images of immunostained cells were captured by confocal microscopy (MRC1024; BioRad, Hercules, CA) to acquire a single focal plane with a 100×, 1.4 NA lens. Digital images were processed using Adobe Photoshop 6.0 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). The number of punctate immunopositive signals larger than 1 pixel (0.16 × 0.16 μm2/pixel with a 255-gradient signal intensity; signals lower than 165 on the scale were cut off to eliminate noise) was counted by measuring the area with a signal above 165 on the scale, using IPLab software. Scores from the secondary dendrites of 10 neurons were normalized to each control (= 1.0). Results presented as mean ± SE were compared by two-tailed unpaired Student t tests using Excel software.
Glass coverslips with infected cells (as indicated by GFP fluorescence) at 21 DIV were transferred to an experimental chamber and superfused with modified Krebs-Ringer solution (in mM): NaCl 150, KCl 4, CaCl2 2, glucose 5, pyruvate 2, HEPES 5 (pH 7.4 with NaOH). Tetrodotoxin (1 μM) and picrotoxin (50 μM) were added to block action potentials and inhibitory synaptic transmission, respectively. The experimental chamber, consisting of an acrylic frame with a glass bottom, was mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope equipped with interference-contrast optics (Axiovert 100S, ZEISS, Germany). Patch pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries (Clark Electromedical Instruments, Pangbourne, U.K.) with a horizontal puller (P-97 Flaming/Brown Micropipette Puller, Sutter Instrument Company, U.S.A.). The pipettes had direct current resistance of 3–6 MΩ (tip diameter ~1–2 μm) when filled with solution (in mM): K-gluconate 25, KOH 80, CsCl 60, methane sulfonic acid 60, MgCl2 4, CaCl2 0.8, EGTA 2, Na2-ATP 4, Na2-GTP 0.2, glutathione 1, glucose 5 and HEPES 30 (pH 7.2 with CsOH, ≅ 330 mosm/l). The pipettes were connected to a patch-clamp amplifier and filtered with a 1-kHz Bessell low-pass filter (AXOPATCH 200B, Axon Instruments, U.S.A.). Data acquisition was done with Clampex software (Axon Instruments, U.S.A.). Miniature EPSCs sampled at 50 kHz were detected and fitted to a template function using custom software  written in IDL (Research System Inc., Boulder, CO). Peak amplitudes and interval were calculated for about 200 mEPSCs from each cell. Detection threshold was set to 5 pA amplitude. The data from 12 cells for each construct were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric test. Significance was set at p < 0.01. Recordings were performed at room temperature (22–25°C).
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Japan Science and Technology Agency, and by RIKEN.
- Brakeman PR, Lanahan AA, O'Brien R, Roche K, Barnes CA, Huganir RL, Worley PF: Homer: a protein that selectively binds metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature. 1997, 386 (6622): 284-288. 10.1038/386284a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato A, Ozawa F, Saitoh Y, Hirai K, Inokuchi K: vesl, a gene encoding VASP/Ena family related protein, is upregulated during seizure, long-term potentiation and synaptogenesis. FEBS Lett. 1997, 412 (1): 183-189. 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00775-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato A, Ozawa F, Saitoh Y, Fukazawa Y, Sugiyama H, Inokuchi K: Novel members of the Vesl/Homer family of PDZ proteins that bind metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273 (37): 23969-23975. 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23969.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun J, Tadokoro S, Imanaka T, Murakami SD, Nakamura M, Kashiwada K, Ko J, Nishida W, Sobue K: Isolation of PSD-Zip45, a novel Homer/vesl family protein containing leucine zipper motifs, from rat brain. FEBS Lett. 1998, 437 (3): 304-308. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01256-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiao B, Tu JC, Petralia RS, Yuan JP, Doan A, Breder CD, Ruggiero A, Lanahan AA, Wenthold RJ, Worley PF: Homer regulates the association of group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors with multivalent complexes of homer-related, synaptic proteins. Neuron. 1998, 21 (4): 707-716. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80588-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi Y, Mizutani A, Bito H, Fujisawa K, Narumiya S, Mikoshiba K, Furuichi T: Cupidin, an isoform of Homer/Vesl, interacts with the actin cytoskeleton and activated rho family small GTPases and is expressed in developing mouse cerebellar granule cells. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (19): 8389-8400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi-Yamaguchi Y, Furuichi T: The Homer family proteins. Genome Biol. 2007, 8 (2): 206-10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-206.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tadokoro S, Tachibana T, Imanaka T, Nishida W, Sobue K: Involvement of unique leucine-zipper motif of PSD-Zip45 (Homer 1c/vesl-1L) in group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96 (24): 13801-13806. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tu JC, Xiao B, Naisbitt S, Yuan JP, Petralia RS, Brakeman P, Doan A, Aakalu VK, Lanahan AA, Sheng M, et al.: Coupling of mGluR/Homer and PSD-95 complexes by the Shank family of postsynaptic density proteins. Neuron. 1999, 23 (3): 583-592. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80810-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi MK, Ames HM, Hayashi Y: Tetrameric hub structure of postsynaptic scaffolding protein homer. J Neurosci. 2006, 26 (33): 8492-8501. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2731-06.2006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizutani A, Kuroda Y, Futatsugi A, Furuichi T, Mikoshiba K: Phosphorylation of Homer3 by calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II regulates a coupling state of its target molecules in Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2008, 28 (20): 5369-5382. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4738-07.2008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi Y, Mizutani A, Mikoshiba K, Furuichi T: Coincidence in dendritic clustering and synaptic targeting of homer proteins and NMDA receptor complex proteins NR2B and PSD95 during development of cultured hippocampal neurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003, 22 (2): 188-201. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00037-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sala C, Piech V, Wilson NR, Passafaro M, Liu G, Sheng M: Regulation of dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function by Shank and Homer. Neuron. 2001, 31 (1): 115-130. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00339-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sala C, Roussignol G, Meldolesi J, Fagni L: Key role of the postsynaptic density scaffold proteins Shank and Homer in the functional architecture of Ca2+ homeostasis at dendritic spines in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2005, 25 (18): 4587-4592. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4822-04.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris KM: Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999, 9 (3): 343-348. 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80050-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nimchinsky EA, Sabatini BL, Svoboda K: Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annu Rev Physiol. 2002, 64: 313-353. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.081501.160008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi Y, Mizutani A, Yuasa S, Mikoshiba K, Furuichi T: Glutamate-induced declustering of post-synaptic adaptor protein Cupidin (Homer 2/vesl-2) in cultured cerebellar granule cells. J Neurochem. 2003, 87 (2): 364-376. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02003.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irie F, Yamaguchi Y: EphB receptors regulate dendritic spine development via intersectin, Cdc42 and N-WASP. Nat Neurosci. 2002, 5 (11): 1117-1118. 10.1038/nn964.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreis P, Thévenot E, Rousseau V, Boda B, Muller D, Barnier JV: The p21-activated kinase 3 implicated in mental retardation regulates spine morphogenesis through a Cdc42-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (29): 21497-21506. 10.1074/jbc.M703298200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wegner AM, Nebhan CA, Hu L, Majumdar D, Meier KM, Weaver AM, Webb DJ: N-wasp and the arp2/3 complex are critical regulators of actin in the development of dendritic spines and synapses. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283 (23): 15912-20. 10.1074/jbc.M801555200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayashi K, Shirao T: Change in the shape of dendritic spines caused by overexpression of drebrin in cultured cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 1999, 19 (10): 3918-3925.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi H, Sekino Y, Tanaka S, Mizui T, Kishi S, Shirao T: Drebrin-dependent actin clustering in dendritic filopodia governs synaptic targeting of postsynaptic density-95 and dendritic spine morphogenesis. J Neurosci. 2003, 23 (16): 6586-6595.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiraishi Y, Mizutani A, Yuasa S, Mikoshiba K, Furuichi T: Differential expression of Homer family proteins in the developing mouse brain. J Comp Neurol. 2004, 473 (4): 582-599. 10.1002/cne.20116.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luo L: Actin cytoskeleton regulation in neuronal morphogenesis and structural plasticity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002, 18: 601-635. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.031802.150501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park E, Na M, Choi J, Kim S, Lee JR, Yoon J, Park D, Sheng M, Kim E: The Shank family of postsynaptic density proteins interacts with and promotes synaptic accumulation of the beta PIX guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac1 and Cdc42. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (21): 19220-19229. 10.1074/jbc.M301052200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Govek EE, Newey SE, Akerman CJ, Cross JR, Veken Van der L, Van Aelst L: The X-linked mental retardation protein oligophrenin-1 is required for dendritic spine morphogenesis. Nat Neurosci. 2004, 7 (4): 364-372. 10.1038/nn1210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tu JC, Xiao B, Yuan JP, Lanahan AA, Leoffert K, Li M, Linden DJ, Worley PF: Homer binds a novel proline-rich motif and links group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors with IP3 receptors. Neuron. 1998, 21 (4): 717-726. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80589-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beneken J, Tu JC, Xiao B, Nuriya M, Yuan JP, Worley PF, Leahy DJ: Structure of the Homer EVH1 domain-peptide complex reveals a new twist in polyproline recognition. Neuron. 2000, 26 (1): 143-154. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81145-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Irie K, Nakatsu T, Mitsuoka K, Miyazawa A, Sobue K, Hiroaki Y, Doi T, Fujiyoshi Y, Kato H: Crystal structure of the Homer 1 family conserved region reveals the interaction between the EVH1 domain and own proline-rich motif. J Mol Biol. 2002, 318 (4): 1117-1126. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00170-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barzik M, Carl UD, Schubert WD, Frank R, Wehland J, Heinz DW: The N-terminal domain of Homer/Vesl is a new class II EVH1 domain. J Mol Biol. 2001, 309 (1): 155-169. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4640.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yuan JP, Kiselyov K, Shin DM, Chen J, Shcheynikov N, Kang SH, Dehoff MH, Schwarz MK, Seeburg PH, Muallem S, Worley PF: Homer binds TRPC family channels and is required for gating of TRPC1 by IP3 receptors. Cell. 2003, 114 (6): 777-89. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00716-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harigaya Y, Shoji M, Shirao T, Hirai S: Disappearance of actin-binding protein, drebrin, from hippocampal synapses in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci Res. 1996, 43 (1): 87-92. 10.1002/jnr.490430111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shim KS, Lubec G: Drebrin, a dendritic spine protein, is manifold decreased in brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease and Down syndrome. Neurosci Lett. 2002, 324 (3): 209-212. 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00210-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Furlow PW, Clemente AS, Velasco PT, Wood M, Viola KL, Klein WL: Abeta oligomer-induced aberrations in synapse composition, shape, and density provide a molecular basis for loss of connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2007, 27 (4): 796-807. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3501-06.2007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato Y, Shiraishi Y, Furuichi T: Cell specificity and efficiency of the Semliki forest virus vector- and adenovirus vector-mediated gene expression in mouse cerebellum. J Neurosci Methods. 2004, 137 (1): 111-121. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.02.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larkum ME, Launey T, Dityatev A, Lüscher HR: Integration of excitatory postsynaptic potentials in dendrites of motoneurons of rat spinal cord slice cultures. J Neurophysiol. 1998, 80 (2): 924-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.